• @TheDarkestShark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    399 months ago

    I feel like most people have a feeling one way or another on this topic because it has become quite political, but the facts are the facts. Most new electric vehicle plants in the US are only working at most 50% capacity due to lack of customer demand. People can blame lack of parts and lack of workers, but one thing I know about this industry is that if people want them then they are going to keep building them regardless of circumstance.

    • TheMoose
      link
      fedilink
      289 months ago

      Here’s my perspective, but it might be pretty wrong:

      I think the reason for the low demand is due in large part to the pre-existing gas industry, at least in the US. Not just because of marketing advertising gas-powered more, but also because people don’t like to change, and buying a new car is not cheap. Not to mention that the US infrastructure is so heavily solidified in gas. It’s just easier to continue buying gas-powered because it’s already so supported across the country. Then the industry benefits from this because they can say, “oh, huh, looks like people still want gas-powered! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯” and so the cycle repeats.

      I think a lot of people don’t really understand how much power corporations really have over what the people do or don’t do, like or don’t like, etc… 99% of the time people will take the easy option, and corps take advantage of that by making the easy option the cheapest and best for themselves instead of what’s best for the people. Corporations only do what’s right for them, and are masters of making it out to be that that’s what the people want.

      • Colonel Panic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        139 months ago

        Similarly how plastic pollution is 99% made by companies. So we banned plastic straws.

        That’s the equivalent of yelling at me to turn the ceiling lights off to save power, but you have the AC running 24/7 and all the windows are open.

        I hate it.

      • @sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 months ago

        True. And the nepo-babies that lead these corporations are making millions off dollars each year simply by showing up to work.
        Switching over to electric vehicles is inevitable. But who’s going to do that work and take that risk? What if they screw up? Ain’t no nepo-baby gonna screw up that cash cow. They’re going to continue showing up to work every day, sucking up the income and when the end of gasoline happens, they’ll throw up their hands and say, “No one could have seen that coming.”

        (To be fair, it’s not just management. There are tons of people at every level who don’t want to risk losing their job with an uncertain outcome over just showing up to work every day and doing the same job they already know. But it’s the “leadership’s” job to do that anyway for the long-term health of the company.)

    • Colonel Panic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      I would love an electric vehicle.

      But we have two gasoline cars completely paid off and I can’t imagine adding a car payment (or two) just to go electric. I’m more concerned with continuing to afford food and shelter.

      If I could just magically swap them out I would.

    • @BlueAure@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      At least one of the big 3 isn’t meeting production demand due to battery assembly. Long series of management and integrator fuck ups where their solution seems to be just throw more engineers at it. Can’t build EVs if they can’t build batteries.

  • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    75% of American drinking water needs treatment to reduce particulate and parasites, and the treatment additive used to render the water safe is produced at a single chemical plant located in an area of severe flood risk – which means that a flood could take it offline for a day or two, or damage it for weeks.

    (Efforts to build a second site recently fell through due to ever-changing regulations. Of course they’re stockpiling it in some mountain bunker, I’m sure)

    The next Katrina could give us a brain-worms infestation via tap-water.

  • Brad
    link
    fedilink
    229 months ago

    Not exactly secret, but not very well-known. In many states your credit score can be used as a factor in determining the cost of auto insurance for you. Lower credit scores can equal higher premiums.

  • @SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    99
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    These aren’t secrets, but may not be well known (unless you watch LPL):

    Sentry Safes aren’t safes, they are fire boxes with a fancy lock.

    High security locks are not high security because of the lock design, but because the keys are very difficult to have duplicated.

    No one (except maybe intelligence agencies) breaks in to a house by picking a lock, especially in the US. Windows, weak door frames, and, in a pinch, making a hole in the wall are all faster ways of getting in.

    Car keys are so expensive because many manufacturers charge a subscription or per-use fee to access and program the keys to the ignition. These costs are passed on to consumers

    No one is picking your locks just to move things around or steal small, insignificant items. You are either suffering from a mental disorder or a trusted member of the household is gaslighting you (it’s not gaslighting though, you’re your grasp of reality is slipping. Don’t call me for a pick proof lock, just get help please)

    Some manufacturers (you know, in China) will put any sticker you want on the products they produce, including UL and ANSI stickers. Before buying a product that is supposedly fire-rated, such as a fire safe, check the UL website to verify the item is actually listed with them.

    “Grade 1” door hardware sold in stores like Lowe’s or Home Depot is, at best, Grade 2, and is likely Grade 3 (residential grade). These grades are really just about how durable the product is over time, and how much abuse they will endure by the public.

    And just a little practical advice. Find a qualified, honest locksmith before you need one. We’re like plumbers. If you wait until you have an emergency to find one, the quality will be questionable. There are a lot of scammers out there. If you don’t have a resource for locksmiths beyond Google, look on the ALOA website for members in your area. The good ones will know who the other good ones are, and won’t be shy about sharing that info if they are unavailable or too far away

    • @Tekkip20@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      289 months ago

      If I’m not mistaken Nestlé, the firm that makes various brands of chocolate, are known or at least have been known to include slavery in really poor parts of the world.

      When I look at a bottle or a cuddly packaged bit of chocolate, I shudder to think the shit conditions that a person, a child even was forced or on crap pay to produce that from the cocoa farming…

      • @hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Ne*tle also does this thing where they lie to mothers in ‘third-world countries’ (I hate that term but can’t think of a better one rn) by telling them that their baby formula is better than actual milk, then give them some, which the mothers mix with dirty water, and when they can’t afford the formula, they’ll just give the babies plain dirty water.

        • @Jayjader@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 months ago

          An important part of that process that needs mentioning is that when the mothers are convinced by Nestle to feed their babies formula instead of their breast milk, their bodies will stop producing the milk before the baby is weaned from it.

          So Nestle literally endangers babies’ lives just to sell more baby formula.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      359 months ago

      So is banana production. And here I am with a bowl of banana-topped chocolate ice cream. Dammit.

  • @manualoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    639 months ago

    The company that provides your banks phone system has full access to pretty much every piece of information your bank holds on you, including call recordings, phone numbers, addresses, debts, credits, and your phone password. We can trick our own systems into thinking it’s you on the phone.

    Avoid calling your bank at all costs, and if they call you say “no thank you I’ll do that online or in branch”, as soon as you pass security the phone system is accessing all your data. If possible go into branch or do everything on a banking app which has far better security.

      • @manualoverride@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        You actually want them to do this, it’s terrifying easy to set up a cell tower or call centre and convince banks and people you are customers or banks.

        • @ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          209 months ago

          I think he was meaning because of how easy it is to spoof and intercept sms. Use some thing like OTP that’s a common standard instead.

          • @manualoverride@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            49 months ago

            Ah I see, yes app/web OTP is one of the best methods, unless people are calling to report the app/website not working (a workflow I’ve seen many times) The industry has put hundreds of millions into voice recognition but the sample size required for AI to trick voicerec is really low now.

          • @kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            79 months ago

            You probably mean TOTP. OTP is a generic term for any one-time-password which includes SMS-based 2FA. The other main standard is HOTP which will use a counter or challenge instead of the time as the input but this is rarely used.

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      129 months ago

      call recordings

      your phone password

      Can you explain more about this? You’re saying the bank app is grabbing this data from your phone, or what are you saying?

      I’m not saying you are wrong, necessarily, I’m just surprised to hear it

      • @iSeth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        Not the password to unlock your phone, but the credentials your bank may require to verify your identity over the phone. A security question/answer, a passphrase or a sequence keyed during the call.

        • @manualoverride@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          This is correct, i should have said “telephone banking password/passcode” but also the security questions are at best hash encrypted (so basically plain text). I had thousands of hours of call recording and millions of customer details on my work laptop all unencrypted. The security for enterprise telephony companies is seriously lax, I wouldn’t be surprised if a few unexplained leaks originated from these companies.

  • Elise
    link
    fedilink
    769 months ago

    Many game companies specifically target vulnerable people, who end up spending their entire pay check every month, and are called Whales.

  • csolisr
    link
    fedilink
    49 months ago

    @protein Many things that you’d think would be under lock and key… are not. Credentials for, say, a database of subscribers to a telephone company? Just ask the team and say you’re working on an integration, they’ll happily send you the password in plain text

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    349 months ago

    Governments don’t pay consultants to do work, but to leave when the work is done.

    • @I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      You pay a consultant to take liability. Sure, you could do this in house, but wouldn’t you rather have someone outside of the organization use their liability insurance?

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        A lot of consultants and contractors do the work for different governments. A reason why governments like this is that private companies find hiring and firing a lot easier. So, if a company performs poorly, it is really easy to fire them. In some cases, governments can also get individuals working for the consultant or contractor to stop working on that governments’ jobs, effectively firing them.

        It can be a lot easier to get rid of a poorly performing consultant over a poorly performing government worker.

        • @trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          That’s when the company doesn’t do kicks to the project lead, or when you bring your full extended family. In those cases see how everyone will despair while working double and wondering wtf is “company” still working in our project.