Google copying mrkrabs lol
Could a grease monkey script do something similar? I’m probably just talking out of my butt, but it seems like GM can sometimes do things easier or better (or just at all) that extensions can’t or won’t do.
For other Chromium browsers or those who don’t see this yet, enable
chrome://flags#extension-manifest-v2-deprecation-warning.That’s a funny way to say “you should uninstall chrome rather than leaving it unused” but I hear you Google. 🫡
Never a better a time to join Mozilla Gang.
-Message brought to you by Mozilla Gang
Oh no uses Firefox Anyway…
Daily plug for Cromite: https://github.com/uazo/cromite
Chrome, but it doesn’t suck, doesn’t track you, and it has good, fast native adblock.
Also in some linux repos now. I know its in CachyOS. And it’s on Android, too.
Have they committed to maintaining manifest V2 into the future?
Not sure about that, but the built in adblock and privacy featurres won’t be killed by V3.
Good riddance then. Fuck chrome
There it is. Firefox and Librewolf will guide us out of this mess.
Their new UI made the browser unusable anyway. Looks like a child toy to me.
I don’t really love Firefox’s default UI but I can customize it with about:config and userChrome.css to fit my taste.
Very firefox, very legal very cool.
laughs in firefox
Google Chrome warns of a drop of users. There, I corrected the title.
that’d be great but i’m pretty sure like 90% of chrome users don’t even know what an extension or even an adblocker is. they’ll just keep using chrome because that’s the browser everyone else uses unfortunately
Yuge! > here, you forgot this.
Safari is ok too…
Apple Products get flak in these parts
Safari is trash. Especially on iOS.
If only it was also available on Linux. I really like using it on my Mac.
So, what they’re saying is: Chrome will have severely decreased functionality and users will no longer be able to protect themselves from sketchy ads that contain scams, malware, and other nefarious bullshit (often hosted on Google’s own ad networks)?
Users can still use ad blockers. Users will be safer from malicious extensions sending all your web traffic to an untrusted party.
Nope
Yep. Facts.
You seem to be struggling with the term “facts”
Is your feelings facts to you? Which fact specifically am I struggling with? Do you have anything concrete to say at all or are you just going to keep being vague because of feelings?
Whew, kinda weird to find a Google employee on lemmy. I would have thought there were rules against that in the would employee handbook.
I don’t work for Google. Are you in a cult or an anti-opensource PR firm? Why would that be your first instinct in response to facts? Go read the beginners guide to MV3. Maybe you could learn a thing or two before talking about feelings.
You gave no facts, just opinions.
And if you aren’t aware, astroturfing is a thing.
Of course they’re aware, they’re doing it right now.
I gave you facts about MV3. It is also explained at the beginning of the uBOL GitHub page which even acknowledges MV3 adds protections to users with some filtering tradeoffs. Those tradeoffs can be implemented in other ways but it is more work and would require other software. I am not here saying Google is perfect or that MV3 is perfect, but it does make installing extensions more secure for the average user. If you don’t agree then be specific. This vagueness that you keep utilizing without providing any details at all to try to make a point is a clear sign that you honestly have no clue what you’re talking about.
Yeah, that’s not even how Ublock Origin fucking works, what a hilariously ignorant take.
Did I say that the author of uBlock Origin actually reads your traffic? No I didn’t, so stop the bad faith arguments. I said that MV2 exposed users to malicious extensions that were able to do that. Most features of uBO work fine with uBOL. Not everything does though, and I do acknowledge that. I’m just saying MV3 does make a majority of users safer overall.
Seeing all your traffic is required for an ad blocker to function correctly.
An ad blocker doesn’t need to see your traffic to function. That is the point of the declarative APIs. It is supposed to help protect users from malicious extensions and some forms of malicious software.
Yes, it absolutely does.
An adblocker has unconditional complete control of my browser because I want it to have unconditional complete control of my browser, because it cannot do what I want it to any other way. Taking that control away from me is malicious by definition. It’s more malicious when every single person on the planet with a shred of tech knowledge knows with certainty that it’s for the sole purpose of boosting Google’s ad revenue at the expense of their users.
What are you expecting, a corp to… ah… uh… not be evil, or something? :-P
Thank you very much for summoning Jeff Goldblum’s voice into my head.
I… uh, found a way:-D.
Google is primarily an ad company
It did not always used to be this way, though it was always headed here.
