With the number of people concerned about privacy, it is a wonder why chrome is even popular.

  • @Maped@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    229 days ago

    2 years later, the “Manifest” is doing it’s job and still I know some people that would not leave their favorite Chrome.

  • RogueSensei
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I’ve played around with a few browsers, and while Firefox is a better alternative to chrome, I’d more recommend a privacy hardened fork of firefox such as LibreWolf or GNU IceCat. I’ve also used mullvad browser which is kinda neat.

    Some people are too comfortable using chrome for it’s extension library however, so if a mozilla-based browser doesn’t fulfill the extensions requirement, Brave browser is a good choice. I haven’t tried de-googled chromium, but I imagine it’s food for the reasons it says on the tin.

  • ohmyiv
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    Firefox for Android is a blessing with extensions. Most of my favorite desktop privacy extensions are available on mobile. I love it.

  • Pyro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    With the number of people concerned about privacy

    That number appears to be very small, all things considered. Out of everyone I know, literally one person cares about privacy. My mother. She will even go as far as to only use her first initial online instead of her name if she can get away with it. However, she uses Chrome all the time because she doesn’t understand that your browser also tracks you.

    I think that’s what it comes down to. A mixture of lack of public interest, and lack of public awareness about tracking/privacy in general. If people can’t immediately see how having their data harvested will inconvenience/hurt them, they simply don’t care.

  • @emptyother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    And if you miss PWAs, Firefox got an extension for it now. Check out PWAsForFirefox. And unless Edge and Chrome, you can edit the name before pinning the site.

    A few bugs and drawbacks though. It uses its own profile, so you will probably want Firefox Sync to transfer your password vault and extensions to it.

        • GunnarRunnar
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          It’s not the “add to home screen” button that installs a link which then works without Firefox UI?

          • @emptyother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Thats on android only. And no, it isnt. If its a PWA then that button changes to “Install”. Which does almost the same thing as “Add to home screen” except it opens the webpage up as if it was a separate app. That means it gets its own entry in the “Recent apps” list and its own icon, and it hides the address bar.

            Edit: You can test this yourself by going to lemmy.world on your phone. It is a PWA. Any website can really be a PWA, it just needs a manifest file. Lemmy.worlds manifest are available here and you can see what settings it contains.

  • ⁧⁧⁧
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I prefer Vivaldi over Firefox. More features, better customizability.

    But the again I might be the only one…

  • Nioxic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22 years ago

    If you truly value privacy you’ll use mullvad vpn and tor browser?

    • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Interesting. I switched to Firefox and will stay there, but I must say, Chrome is the most polished browser I’ve used. Firefox is a weird buggy mess that constantly freezes.

      The Android version is clunky as hell, also.

      Not to mention they finally fixed an issue with the print dialog in Firefox after months and me reporting it every single update.

      Still sticking with Firefox, though.

      • Captain Poofter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’re getting downvoted for an opinion, but I’m upvoting you because I actually want to know the downsides of switching, because I’m considering it myself. Is there any truth to what you’re saying, or do people just not like you saying something bad about firefox? I don’t mind downsides to switching, I’d just like to be aware of them first so I don’t get surprised and frustrated.

        • @tchebb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I mainly use Firefox (on both Linux and Android), but I also use Chrome regularly. I wouldn’t describe Firefox as buggy or clunky. On the whole, I find Firefox more pleasant to use than Chrome on its own merits—nothing at all to do with privacy or Google.

          I do agree that Chrome is more performant on JS-heavy websites, but not so much so that I find Firefox sluggish by comparison. And both slow down significantly once you have lots of tabs open.

          I prefer Firefox’s tab UI to Chrome’s, both on desktop and mobile:

          • Firefox on desktop will scroll the tab bar horizontally once you have enough tabs open, meaning you can still see the title of each. Chrome will keep on shrinking your tabs until each is just an icon, making it really hard to tell between different pages on the same site.
          • The “tab groups” feature of Chrome on Android confuses me and isn’t intuitive at all IMO. Firefox just has a traditional list of tabs, which I find much easier to use.

          I also love Firefox’s screenshot tool. It’s so much nicer than taking a screenshot via the OS:

          • It lets you screenshot an entire page even if it’s too tall for the screen.
          • It lets you select specific elements on the page precisely.
          • If you invoke it through the developer console, you can take high-DPI screenshots even if you’re using a low-DPI monitor. It’ll re-render the page for you behind the scenes.

          Firefox also has way better (read: any at all) hardware video decoding support on desktop Linux than Chrome does. Some distros patch Chrome to add that support, but Firefox has it in official builds out of the box.

          I started using Firefox on Android because my old phone (Nexus 5X) was very RAM-constrained and Firefox seemed to kick fewer other apps out of RAM than Chrome did. I now have a newer phone where RAM isn’t an issue, but I still use Firefox, mainly for uBlock and because it can sync tabs, bookmarks, and history to Firefox on my desktop. It runs just as smoothly as Chrome does in my experience.

          This is all my personal experience, though. I have experienced frustrating Firefox bugs in the past that make it crash or freeze, and it sounds like GP is currently experiencing one such bug. But I’ve used Firefox for over a decade and probably only encountered 3-4 such bugs. Each time, once I got frustrated enough to go digging, I found an existing upstream bug report describing the root cause and a workaround to use until a proper fix landed (usually within a couple releases). I’ve used Chrome a lot less regularly, so I don’t know if the experience there is comparable or if they do just have better QA for bugs like that. Either way, I think the benefits of Firefox for me outweigh the occasional bug that gets through for a few releases.

          • Captain Poofter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Thanks a lot for this detailed run down! You’ve done a good job filling in the blank spots for me, and convinced me to download the app. I forgot that there was a desktop version as well, I’ve only been thinking of mobile! I have noticed YouTube videos look worse when streaming from my PC vs on the TV apps …it’ll be interesting to check if Firefox does better because of what you said about the video.

        • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          My guess would be that calling it a weird buggy mess that freezes all the time does not line up with most people’s experience.

          I’ve been using Firefox since before it was Firefox and have no idea what he’s talking about.

            • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              I never said it was perfect, I said your “weird, buggy, freezing mess” assessment didn’t align with most people’s experience.

              I remember the quantum rewrite, that was 6 years ago, not terribly relevant today.

              I also don’t blame Firefox for Google screwing with non-chrome browsers. We saw the same thing 20 years ago with IE.

        • @ThoughtGoblin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Everytime Firefox updates I have to restart the entire browser or it won’t let me open a new tab. This has been going on for years. As a dev, I can’t dynamically edit source during runtime ever since the Quantum update. It’s noticeably slower these days, which is especialy bad on mobile/laptops due to battery life. If you’re on Windows, you don’t get video super sampling (NVIDIA) or HDR videos.

          I wouldn’t call it a buggy mess that crashes frequently, but it’s certainly constantly getting on my nerves.

          • Captain Poofter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Shouldn’t you have to restart the browser when it updates? Isn’t that normal? That’s how Chrome works? Or do you mean it doesn’t save your browser tabs for whenever you opens, or?

            The no-hdr videos might be a deal breaker for me on PC… I watch a lot of videos. Thanks for mentioning this.

        • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Performance is worse in general. It’s something you’ll have to try for yourself, but websites generally load worse on Firefox.

          Some Google websites will intentionally block you, or serve you older pages if you’re on Firefox. Using a plugin to modify your agent string is a work around, but also makes it seem like you’re using Chrome within their analytics which isn’t a good thing.

          Like I said, firefox had a bug where printing shipping labels wasn’t working. Took me months of reporting before it was just recently fixed. No one ever acknowledged my issue, and still to this day the bug report was never marked as fixed. I had to run my company from a chromium based browser for months because of it.

          The Android app is ass. It’s so clunky and runs like crap. At least it has ublock origin, which is nice. Only recently did firefox finally get pull to refresh, and it’s a buggy pile of crap lol.

          I think it’s good to use Firefox. Chromium based future isn’t a good thing, and Chrome is evil trying to block ad blocking with manifest v3, and being literally the only Android browser without ad blocking. Even chromium based Edge has ad blocking on Android.

          People on Lemmy are hard core enthusiasts at the moment. I think anyone that says anything negative about things enthusiasts are really passionate about, like Firefox, Linux, etc, will be downvoted.

          I think it’s important to not be a fanboy and to be aware of shortcomings. I’m not against Firefox. It’s the only browser I use now, and I highly suggest everyone give it a try, but I’m also not going to pretend it’s some amazing experience. It’s clunky, but it’s run by a good foundation, has some neat features Chrome doesn’t, and it’s helping prevent an even larger chromium monopoly. Give it a go! Just be aware it’s not perfect, and I think you’ll be more likely to stick with it long term.

          • Captain Poofter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            The way it’s seeming after reading some of these replies is I may end up just having both browsers installed and swapping depending on what I wanna do… Not ideal, but I think it’d be better than all Chrome all the time. Thanks so much for the info

        • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          Which part?

          Firefox doesn’t handle media playback as smoothly as chromium based browsers do. This is because of the codecs and plugins Firefox uses instead.

          Firefox on Android is very clunky. Pull to refresh was in the beta for years, and they finally just released it into the main branch and it’s bugged to shit. It was a meme how long it was in development and still doesn’t work right, despite every other browser and app having pull to refresh work perfectly.

          I want to be clear, I exclusively use Firefox and think chromium is dangerous for the web. I’m just not going to lie and act like firefox is perfect. If it was, it would have larger marketshare. There’s a reason Chrome, despite being a privacy nightmare, is still at the top. There’s a reason nearly every browser is chromium based.

          I think being open about the shortcomings and experience you have with software is healthy. Good for development and good for making new users switch. Being critical is a good thing!

          • @Gizm0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            Preach, brother.

            I love Firefox for all its customization and configuration. I use it exclusively on my personal machine.

            That said, Chrome is objectively the better browser for 99% of websites.