• @5paceThunder@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    427 months ago

    If openai gets to use copyrighted content for free, then so should every one else.

    If that happens, no point making anything, since your stuff will get stolen anyway

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    1947 months ago

    In every other circumstance I can think of, “I can’t make money doing a thing unless I break the law” means don’t do that thing.

    Why should AI get special treatment?

        • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          Now about that fake money for criminals - it was quite useful for me when I needed to send money to my sister, with me being in Russia and her being outside, and it was year 2022. Also with the way ruble sank after the war, buying BTC hours after seeing news of it starting was probably a bargain. Would be twice as expensive the next day.

          I haven’t used Uber (Yandex Taxi) and Airbnb (asocial type and have responsibilities), and I agree about the plagiarism machine.

          • rautapekoni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            So you didn’t do the crime, but your home country did, and you could use crypto to make life easier despite the repercussions. I’d say it’s not a bad fit.

            • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Nah. Arbitrary shit that doesn’t hurt those who did the crime, but does hurt me, is not repercussions. Neither is it a crime to find tools to solve such problems.

          • @Crismus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Sorry to break it to you, but bypassing sections is a crime. You just proved his point. Sanctions are supposed to make life difficult for the people in sanctioned countries so that those people maybe start doing something to the person causing the problems.

            It may be useful, but it was designed to facilitate criminal payments.

            • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Sanctions are supposed to make life difficult for the people in sanctioned countries so that those people maybe start doing something to the person causing the problems.

              Nah. They are supposed to reduce connectivity for everyone except the right people with connections, who deal in shit big enough, like oil, gas etc, but not us serfs and not businessmen who don’t respect their government officials enough to bribe them. This worked especially well in the Iron Curtain times, and it seems there are people nostalgic of that now.

              First, spitting into my soup for something other people did is not going to make me more pissed at them (suppose I already was), it’s going to make me more pissed at those spitting into my soup.

              Second, knowing that Israel isn’t sanctioned, Turkey isn’t sanctioned, Azerbaijan isn’t sanctioned, but Russia is, not being better, makes it extremely hard to believe that those sanctions are meant to solve problems. Even if I didn’t know how they work.

              Third, a country can’t make something a crime outside their jurisdiction.

      • @solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        297 months ago

        Ah yes, the original unviable silicon valley businesses! I love how they used their VC money to undercut and kill small businesses all over the world.

      • @Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        AirBNB is currently failing. Uber likely will when people catch on to “dynamic pricing”

    • @Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      The more the original work is transformed, the more likely it is to be considered fair use rather than infringement.

  • teft
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Sounds like an argument slave owners would use. “My plantation can’t make money without free labor!”

    • @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 months ago

      How do you think slave owners got bailouts after the 13th amendment was passed and the slaves got freed?

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        Reminds me of that time the Federal government granted land parcels to a bunch of former slaves (using land from plantations) and then rescinded them again.

      • WHYAREWEALLCAPS
        link
        fedilink
        127 months ago

        They used that part of the 13th that said “Well, except prisoners, those can be slaves.” Local law enforcement rounded up former slaves on trumped up charges and leased them back to the same plantation owners they were freed from. Only now if they escaped they were “escaped criminals” and they could count on even northern law enforcement returning them. The US is still a pro-slavery country and will be as long as that part of the 13th amendment stands.

      • @qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        appreciate the important reality check, but I think the parent was just highlighting the absurdity of the original argument with hyperbole.

        people are in jail for doing exactly what this company is doing. either enforce the laws equally (!) or change them (whatever that means in late stage capitalism).

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      My plantation can’t make money without everybody’s labour.

  • @deltreed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t mind him using copyrighted materials as long as it leads to OpenAI becoming truly open source. Humans can replicate anything found in the wild with minor variations, so AI should have the same access. This is how human creativity builds upon itself. Why limit AI? We already know all the jobs people have will be replaced anyway eventually.

  • kn0wmad1c
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Cool. If OpenAI gets a pass, then piracy should be legal, right? I mean what good is a trademark or copyright law?

    Edit: “I can’t make money without stealing other people’s work” is definitely a take

    • @xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      “I can’t be at financial peace if I have to pay for every movie I want to watch”

    • @IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      587 months ago

      No, see, piracy is just you downloading movies for yourself. To be like OpenAI you need to download it, put it in a pretty package with a bow, then sell it over and over again. Only when it’s piracy for profit do you get to beg and plead for a pass.

  • @Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 months ago

    Does anyone else hear that? Its the worlds smallest AI violin playing the saddest song composed by an AI

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      151
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Honestly this meme is way understating the sinisterness

      • Election interference for money machine
      • Whole internet is ads company
      • Dopamine addiction for all children
      • Superpowers for law enforcement