• GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    06 months ago

    Just as planned - Amazon Execs who aren’t planning to rehire them anyway.

    They do this shit to cull you.

    • @Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      It’s sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can’t find employment elsewhere.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -16 months ago

      If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

    • @Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

      So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

    • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      It’s like reverse stack ranking. They’ll be left with the people that couldn’t find another job.

  • @sjh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wow, it seems like the return-to-office mandate is causing quite the shake-up! Totally get why folks are jumping ship - flexibility has become such a big deal, especially after getting used to working from home. I read that 65% of workers now say they’d consider quitting if they couldn’t work remotely! It’s all about finding that work-life balance in a job that respects our needs. Hang in there, tech friends—plenty of companies out there understand the power of flexibility and trust!

  • @itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    Google, Microsoft, hell even Netflix and Capital One, will be bending over backwards for this tech talent.
    Look at that Amazon east coast HQ in Virginia, just down the road from Capital One’s HQ. One of AWS’s biggest customers will bendfit from this.

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 months ago

    That was probably the intent. It works as a soft layoff. Do something wildly unpopular, knowing that a bunch of employees will quit. The ones left will pick up the slack, because obviously if they had anywhere else to go they would’ve left with the first group.

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    I really do wonder if Amazon will run out of people willing to work for them someday. Their approach assumes there is an infinite supply of workers to burn through. Given everything I’ve witnessed from the company, I’d never work there. Do they at some point poison the labor pool against them?

    • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      When I joined Amazon, I was told that for some roles in the US Amazon received more applications than corporate employees worldwide - so I assume 1M+.

      That number has probably reduced significantly, given we’ve now had two rounds of RTO. I know some recruiters are really struggling to find external candidates to join, and rightly so, but I don’t doubt that Amazon can find someone to fill these roles, or can find someone outside of North America or Europe to take that role.

      The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say “I worked for FAANG”. Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they’ll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

      (FWIW, I’ve been at Amazon as a software engineer for close to four years now, and I’ve noticed zero improvement in opportunities afforded to me)

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 months ago

        The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say “I worked for FAANG”. Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they’ll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

        The problem is that the clout boost is real. I never worked for a FAANG/MANGA company, but just having one relatively well-known company on my resume opened up options I never would have had. All my interviewers would mention it, even though it was almost 20 years ago.

        • @roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -16 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve gotten multiple jobs in my industry based on a company I worked for like 15 years ago. Just because they’re a major player who is well respected.

  • @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    Amazing.

    They order people to work in different offices than before, far away from before, or in offices that did not even exist before. They order people to work in offices who have only worked at home before.

    And they call it “return”, and everybody seems to accept the audacity.

    Nobody laughs out loud into their faces and calls them the dirty liars that they are.

  • @omarfw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 months ago

    Now they can replace them without paying unemployment and pay the new workers a lower wage. This is what they wanted to happen. Mega corporations are a problem we need to solve as a society.

    • @eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      yeah, the only problem is that this results in the best talent leaving, you’re stuck with people who have nowhere else to go. it’s one of those short-term profits kinda things, which is why Wall St loves it so much.

    • @blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      This isn’t what they want to happen. They know it will happen, but this isn’t the goal or objective.

      Amazon is a big boy company, if they want to cut staff, they’ll cut staff. The problem with cutting staff this way, is that they don’t get to decide who they’re cutting. They don’t want to cut talented employees at random, they want to pick the low performers and let them go. This is kind of the opposite of that.

      The higher skilled the employee is, the more likely they are to have been hired remote, and to feel they can find another job also. That means they’re effectively shooting themselves in the foot and getting rid of some of their talented employees for the benefit of bringing people into the office.

      There has been a swing in the business opinion that work from home isn’t as efficient. This is basically the higher-ups falling in line with that opinion.

    • @orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      Quality programmers are a finite resource. Amazon chewed through the entire unskilled labor market with their warehouses and then struggled to find employees to meet their labor needs. If they try the same stunt with skilled labor they’re in for a very rude awakening. They’ll be able to find people, but only for well above market rates. They’re highly likely to find in the long run it would have been much cheaper to hang onto the people they already had.

      • greenskye
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        That’s the next executive’s problem. These executives will jump ship with their golden parachutes before any of that affects them.

      • @omarfw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        The whole problem with companies like Amazon is that hardly anyone in charge of them seems to care about long term sustainability. They all just invest enough effort to squeeze out some short term profits, earn their bonuses and then leave for another company to do it all again. Nobody is interested in sustainability because there is no incentive to. They’re playing hot potato with the collapse of the company.

  • @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    If it’s anything like my work and their RTO a few things.

    1. hR is well aware of attrition rates and I bet they’re through the roof
    2. Any new hires are probably not the best or brightest they could expect to hire

    So expect quality at Amazon to decline. It may not be outwardly visible but mark my words for those that are still there it will devolve into a chaotic shit show of overworked employees that are left backfilling work for those who left and the incompetence that came in.

  • @EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 months ago

    I hope a significant number of them get new jobs and quiet quit to get that double paycheck for as long as they can.

    • ThePowerOfGeek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      I hope so too. Although the IT job market isn’t great right now, so I doubt the departures will reach a critical mass.