I’ve been putting off having a local copy of the series and movies I watch because I still can access them quickly and cheaply enough in some streaming service, I think it’s time to plan ramping up my selfhosted setup.

  • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    All I can say is Netflix at 12.99 was a tough sell. That was the rate hike that made me drop them. 15.49 forget it.

    When Netflix was the ticket and my sub was 8.99 some years ago, I didn’t pirate anything because I didn’t need to. I’d have to pay a hundred a month due to the fracturing and inflation of streaming services now, and I still wouldn’t get everything. I didn’t wanna pirate, but the industry backed me into a corner.

  • @B0rax@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    Maybe they noticed that most people don’t want the most expensive Plan if they are not allowed to share anymore

  • Briongloid
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    The next step is for the ad-tier to go to $7.99, $8.99, $9.99

    The strategy was always to make the ad-free options more valuable by comparison.

    In no more than 36 months, the ad-tier will cost the $9.99 it was intended to replace, making Netflix having successfully added ads to the base tier, for no discount.

  • @oranwolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    They’re just driving us to self hosted content quicker. Honestly if you can afford a NAS like a Synology or an Asustor, setting up Plex is so easy.

    Some edits to this comment:

    • It’s surprisingly easy to do this versus most other custom configurations. You don’t even have to build a PC and setup holds your hand.
    • This is NOT including obtaining content, I was simply saying “Getting Plex running”.
    • There are other configs you may need to get Plex the way you want, but watching your content on your local network effectively is complete once you complete the standard setup.
      • @oranwolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Yep you do and some may argue that, depending on how you obtain that content, it’s even easier than the setup of the NAS and Plex itself.

    • OOFshoot
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      You vastly over estimate the willingness of people to learn how a computer works.

      • @oranwolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Well, I mean on those vendor NASes it’s pretty much just chuck in a hard drive or two, follow prompts for setup, install the Plex app from said vendor’s app marketplace, make a login, and add your content to the specific TV, Music, or Movie folders…Admittedly this doesn’t get you setup with running Plex outside the network, but as a basic setup it’s fairly easy.

        I’m also confident someone would mess those instructions up, but if you even understand what self hosting is I’m fairy confident someone could follow the above instructions to add their content. Obtaining content is a different story, but if you already have your content it is easy.

      • @FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I self host so much stuff but like… the amount of time and effort that’s gone into that… maybe $10 or $20 a month totally makes sense after all to most people haha

        • @backpackn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Definitely time and learning curve. I’ve really wanted to self host some apps for 1–2 months now. Currently taking basic sql and python courses so that I can do the installations and databases correctly. App documentation is usually lacking and YT tutorials lead to more products and terms I’ve never heard of. There’s a big learning curve for non-programmers.

    • @WimpyWoodchuck@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Even though many people suggest that, I don’t believe you can compare any off-the-shelf streaming service with a self-hosted Plex.

      You have to find and download content to your Plex. You don’t get recommendations. You don’t get a built-in interface on your smart TV. You have to deal with network configuration, VPN, private trackers, seeding ratios etc.

      How on earth is that comparable to pressing the Netflix button on your TV and selecting a recommended show? Even my boomer parents managed to do this on their own.

      • @LiesSlander@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        I think we gotta work on building community if we want to see people really move away from streaming services. One person with a NAS in a small apartment building could help a lot of their neighbors out with entertainment. It would be more work for the person hosting, but if the folks who benefit help their friend out too it might end up being less work overall.

        I’d give someone access, teach them how to use the software, and download some of their favorite shows if they let me borrow their truck when I needed, shared dinner sometimes, or helped me clean house. I think a lot of folks would benefit from that kind of thing, but it would require us making friends with our neighbors. Which, on reflection, is actually really really hard. I imagine it would be kinda awkward to start the conversations around this, but you’d get around the step of everyone getting their own NAS at least!

        • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          I remember in the zeroes everybody knew a guy who sold burned dvd’s. At first they came as a bare dvd in an envelop, but eventually they came in an actual dvd case with a copy of the original sleeve as welll. Some guys would even sell from a stand in public markets.

          I could see these guys sell local hosted streaming services to their neighbours, friends and anyone else through word of mouth.

      • @locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Plex gives recommendations and has apps for smarts TVs.

        Agreed that obtaining the content can be difficult but the user experience is top notch. It even skips credits and jumps to next episodes for tv shows now too.

        For obtaining content, Nefarious is my go to solution. It’s nearly as seamless once you get past initial setup (which is not simple)

      • Takatakatakatakatak
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        If you take the time to RATE everything you watch in Jellyfin the recommendations start getting pretty good.

        I have a built-in interface on my smart TV for Jellyfin, and I had one for Plex.

        I didn’t have to deal with any network config, just login once.

        Your concerns over obtaining the content are valid, but concerns around the user experience are not.

  • @ArcticFox@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    I love Netflix. I’d happily pay them $20 per month for a single account. The problem is their content. It’s not original anymore. Shows with real story and depth have been replaced with reality tv and typical Hollywood formula. Sad seeing the slow decline of the platform that started out so great.

      • @PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        They go by peoples perceived attention spans. On average most people don’t get invested more than 2-3 seasons per show and they keep needing to make more money each year so this is a more efficient strategy.

        • @ObiGynKenobi@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          The issue isn’t the number of seasons, it’s the abrupt cancellation of unresolved stories. 3 seasons is plenty. 2 seasons is fine. Hell, Chernobyl is one of the greatest pieces of media ever produced and that’s a mini-series. Just commit to giving the creators a chance to resolve their story. If that means a truncated final season, so be it. It builds consumer trust, and it increases the value of the back catalog. When I subscribe to a streaming service, a show that was cancelled on a cliffhanger offers me literally zero value. I’m not interested in starting a show that I know will never provide a satisfying conclusion.

        • reric88🧩
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          To be fair, I’m on the fence about this reason. I really don’t like for a good show to get ruined after a long run. I hate for a good show to end, but I like it to end while I enjoy it. I’m usually okay with a series only running a few seasons. However, if the quality stays up, yes, please make more!

          • It’s fine to only have a few seasons, but tell the writers that in advance so they can complete the series.

            Also, cancelling after one season is shitty.

        • pbjamm
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          3 Seasons is plenty of time to create a very complete and compelling story. The problem is when they dont allow for the completion of the story but instead cancel the show for $reasons.

          I watched and loved the german series DARK and was quite excited for the new show 1899 from the same creators. Unfortunately it was dumped after only 1 season so I never even watched it. I dont want to get invested in something that I know will never be completed.

    • @klisurovi4@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      402 years ago

      HDDs are even cheaper and you really don’t need an SSD for movies. You can get a 4tb HDD for less than 50 bucks and that will hold more than enough movies/shows for the majority of people.

      • Björn Tantau
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You can get a 4tb HDD for less than 50 bucks

        [citation needed]

        Couldn’t find them (or some that are close), at least not in the EU.

        Edit: But I’d be happy to see US examples as well.

      • aard
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        If you look at price per TB 4TB drives are a bad choice.

  • @Titan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    We wanted to axe one of our two streaming services next month. This makes the choice pretty easy. The netflix catalogue sucks balls anyway

  • @cyberpiggy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Getting to the point where they aren’t worth the money, it is one increase away from being a dead loss of a service

  • @cyberpiggy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Plexshares are soon going to be the only thing people will need as less money and value without bs politics and taking customers for granted and as fools…

    • @dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you use a “public” Plex share (one that you find online and pay a monthly fee for), Plex will eventually find you and suspend your account.

      A safer approach with Plex is to get a cheap server (assuming you can direct play on most client systems), get an unlimited Dropbox team account for storage, use rclone to mount Dropbox on the server, and auto-download via Usenet using Radarr, Sonarr and Lidarr. Split the cost across a bunch of friends.

      Or just use Weyd or Syncler plus a Real Debrid account. Real Debrid caches torrents so they’re instantly available to stream at full speed over an encrypted (TLS) connection.

        • @dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I’m not sure if either one is definitively better; they both have their pros and cons. Plex is probably the most popular at the moment, so colloquially the term “plex shares” is the most common term used for systems where you pay someone to share their media collection with you.

  • @nixnoodle@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    An alternative to self-hosting and piracy, if there’s something you really want to watch, just buy a month, then immediately cancel the subscription to whatever service has that show, after all the episodes has aired. I usually spend between $30-$50 in total on streaming services in a year this way, and as a principle, I call it “buying a month” as opposed to “subscribing.” Right now I’m waiting for Secret Wars to finish on Disney+. Will probably watch the last few MCU movies and some other stuff during the same month so that’s probably up to 10 shows/movies for $whatever-a-month-goes-for these days. Might do a month of Netflix later in the autumn, as I have a few things I want to watch there now that didn’t quite justify buying on their own. And no, I very rarely rewatch anything, so I don’t really worry about loosing access to them in the future.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        A lot of other services usually offer a yearly discount, and I can see Netflix offering that. However, I don’t see Netflix choosing to get rid of the monthly market entirely.

        • @dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          They could just make the monthly price so high that people will always get the yearly plan. For example, make the yearly plan cost the same amount as three months on the monthly plan.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            They could, but it appears that stream switching is becoming a way that people are consuming streaming media. It becomes a business decision as to whether to go for that market segment or not.

      • k_rol
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        No doubt this is coming in the near future

      • @cyberpiggy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        If that happens…mass exodus don’t think they are that stupid! The service, the company are on a cliff edge…it would be equivalent of slitting their throat and bleeding out fast!

  • @PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    612 years ago

    ONE DEFINITELY SHOULDNT LOOK INTO RADARR OR SONARR OR QBITTORRENT WITH THAT NICE SEARCH BAR THAT SEARCHES MULTIPLE TORRENT SITES.