Maybe I’m just face-blind or being dense but the photos from the scene of the crime look like a different dude than the ginning hostel check in guy. The jackets and backpacks are different. Although people can have multiple jackets and backpacks. We don’t see much of the shooters face but the eyebrows look different. Although, people can pluck/shave eyebrows. I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

  • @Heisenburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 months ago

    I thought I saw that these pictures were taken on different days and the guy on the right has been tagged as a “person of interest” and not officially a “suspect”

    • @xtr0n@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      The police said he’s a person of interest. All the news reports are calling him the shooter. I saw a clip from Good Morning America and they didn’t even bother saying “alleged”. It seems crazy irresponsible.

      • Victor
        link
        fedilink
        105 months ago

        That is actually insanely irresponsible journalism, if you can even call it that. INSANE. American news sources are just a wild west of “information”, isn’t it.

    • @sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Agreed. What I don’t get is that the backpack seems to be a very different color.

      I’m not a conspiracy theorist (I don’t think), but the backpack is the inconsistency that’s interesting to me.

      • @rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Easy enough to be using more than one bag.

        But the front pockets on the jacket are different. The zipper pull is different.

        The fabric on the left is crisper, looks plasticized, and is waterproofed, while the one on the right is fluffy and soft.

        It’s all very subtle, the pictures are low quality. It’s likely not the same guy, but they’re starving to have someone in custody.

        • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Yeah, every hour they don’t have this dude in custody makes them look incompetent, especially for the billionaire class who have so far provided a LOT of cover for the police. This makes the NYPD look especially bad, given their nationwide rep as “the best PD in the country” among us plebs and the fact that their numbers eclipse several small national militaries.

          • @rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Nationwide rep? All I ever hear about them from out of state is corruption and illegal shakedowns. FDNY gets all the glory.

  • @Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    85 months ago

    Someone needs to paint some eyes in the pocket flaps and post it as a meme on the police website to just rub it in how fucking off they are on something so obvious.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    5035 months ago

    I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

    I sure as fuck wouldn’t. I know enough not to come anywhere near the police if they’re scrutinizing me for any reason, even if I know 100% I’m innocent and I can prove it. You absolutely cannot trust them not to just arrest you and railroad you into a bullshit conviction anyway, or plant some evidence, or decide “he had a knife” and just outright kill you. You know how they say “anything you say can be used against you?” That’s because they absolutely won’t use it to help you, even if you’re not guilty of anything.

    I am positive city hall is breathing down the NYPD’s neck real hard right now. The entire department has got a lot of egg on its face for not being able to stop this guy, not being able to positively identify this guy, hell, not even know with any certainty where he went afterwards. They are under immense pressure to hang somebody – anybody – over this because they’re looking even more like chumps than usual.

    So no, a wise man would not expose himself to the cops in any way whatsoever.

    • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      Especially just murdering you. Lot harder to get a corpse to testify that they didn’t do it. Makes it a LOT easier to say “well, they did it, but they’re dead now, case closed.”

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        65 months ago

        Just imagine this is green text.

        Nab the wrong guy

        Shoot him in the back 53 times while screaming “stop resisting!”

        Investigate ourselves, find no wrongdoing

        “Case closed, boys!”

        Police chief gets got by The Adjuster the next day…

      • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        525 months ago

        A dead suspect checks the boxes. Can’t dispute facts with evidence. Allows the media to say they got him. Gives them an easy victory.

        • troybot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          135 months ago

          The CEOs get a false sense of security and are lured out of hiding. Then the real killer guns down another one. Rinse and repeat.

          • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            C’mon man! You should have ended with “Another one bites the dust”.

            Then we could all have it playing in our head!

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      And if the cops do ask and want to pursue questioning you … you don’t talk to the cops in this situation and just ask for a lawyer … they ask what your name is - lawyer … what is your date of birth - lawyer … where are you from? lawyer … lawyer, lawyer, lawyer

      Never talk to the cops, especially when the cops are desperately looking for a suspect.

        • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          185 months ago

          What if you don’t have a lawyer? I know the state can set one up for you, but I also know those lawyers are overworked. They take on something like 12,000 cases per year, and get on average 4 minutes to prepare your case.

          Could I just call my mom and be like “FIND A LAWYER RIGHT NOW PLEASE!”?

          • @Boinkage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            It’s the state’s responsibility/problem to bring you a lawyer if you can’t afford one before the police question you. If the cops are so sure you committed a crime then they’ll charge you and get a public defender assigned so they can interrogate you with a lawyer present. If they don’t have enough evidence they’ll try to bully you into talking without a lawyer present and trick you into confessing. This is one of 403 reasons why it’s important to ask for a lawyer then shut the fuck up until your lawyer arrives.

          • @unmagical@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            265 months ago

            You can use your phone call for whomever, just know it’s not private and you best hope whomever you call will actually help you.

            The distinction I was making is that the response to “can you get me a lawyer?” could just be the cops walking out of the room and coming back several hours later and seeing if you’ve changed your mind. The same thing for “I’ll wait till my lawyer is here.”

            • @RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Isn’t your “phone call” a Hollywood trope? It’s not like you get to gamble on the highest stakes call of your life (oops, line’s busy or you misdialed or whatever), but you only get one chance like it’s some legal gotcha the cops can pull on a suspect.

                • @MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  It’s too bad that cops are and COs think they are above the law. They WILL steal all your money, they MAY beat you up, and you MAY get a phone call if you behave like you’re their little bitch. They like that.

              • @FindME@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                205 months ago

                I’ve been in enough jails to say with some certainty: it depends. Like unmagical posted, some places you will absolutely get a phone call at some point. In others, it’s pretty much an ‘executive privilege.’

                The truth lies in the squishy, wet world of humanity, not the written word of the law. In one jail I know of, they’d give you three chances to make a free phone call (the other party has to accept, because they can’t let an abuser call the abusee without some warning of who it is), and if they weren’t busy, you would be able to keep trying for a couple of hours. Another place, you might get the phone call, but it could be 18+ hours after you were brought in and you had already seen the judge, been given a personal recognizance bond, and would be delaying your exit from said jail if you made the call. Jailers sometimes like to put the thumb screws to you in any way they can.

                Most of the time, inmates will have access to a phone 24/7. Even in solitary, a phone was available. It looked like a pay phone strapped to a dolly that got wheeled right up to the door of the cell and the phone would stick through the little food slot you could look out of. Those phones require money on their account, and it works in a similar manner to the old collect calls. Those phone calls can be as expensive as a dollar a minute. A law was passed in the US around the end of Obama’s term or the beginning of Trump’s that was supposed to set a limit on how much those calls could cost, but I don’t remember what came of it.

                • peopleproblems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  55 months ago

                  I don’t know what you were doing to end up in enough jails to know that, but I suspect that if there’s additional knowledge here, it’s that we should probably not do whatever that was

    • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1755 months ago

      The cops need to present a suspect so they can say they did their job. Whether it’s the right suspect is another matter.

    • @NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You are correct. I’ve been watching a lot of true crime on YouTube lately and regardless whether someone is guilty or innocent, it seems it is ALWAYS in your best interest to get lawyered up and keep quiet if the cops are interrogating you.

      I have mixed feelings about the guilty assholes, because it’s frustrating seeing someone give up their rights and be so open about their crimes but on the other hand, I’m glad they’re so dumb so they can be removed from society and punished.

      But it is nothing but frustration seeing innocent people go through that out of genuine sincerity. “I have nothing to hide, so I’ll be open with the cops.” Fucking do not. No matter how low the statistic actually is, there is too much at stake to risk encountering someone who twists your words and uses it against you to frame you so they can close a case.

      Lawyer up and shut up. Don’t talk to cops as much as you can help it. Especially don’t volunteer to have your name cleared.

    • @piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      I bet they stop releasing info because of the public reaction. At this poiny, they want us to forget and not have copycats. They’re scared.

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I keep seeing the backpack as not matching, I don’t get how these are considered the same person, unless is going to be the next blue-black white-gold thing.

    • @bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      Yeah, the jacket is very different as well if you look at the front chest area. While people do say maybe he just changed his clothes, the problem is if he also changed his backpack, he couldn’t have just put the clothes in the backpack, meaning he would’ve had to have left them somewhere and there would’ve been a trail that probably would’ve been found by now. It doesn’t really add up for them to be the same person.

      • @paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Unless he put the clothes in the backpack and put all of that into the other backpack, Backpackception! It sounds really silly though, like he purposely changed his clothes ever so slightly, just enough that a few people would call it out, instead of changing into a completely different outfit, which would’ve been more effective IMO. It’s just alot of work for little benefit, people come up with the weirdest theories.

  • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 months ago

    Not only do I agree, but also it has been my feeling that the Starbucks footage and visit was a performance of some kind, and the water and phone they found were a distraction. Dude seems to have otherwise thought this through pretty well.

    I admit that’s nothing more than a hunch though, and I can’t really defend it against anyone who disagrees.

  • lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    165 months ago

    I hope it’s not the whole gold/blue dress thing all over again.

    However, I read in another post one might just be someone they want to question to get to the master assassin.

    • @xtr0n@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      I saw a comment on another site where someone said the NYPD confirmed that the “ person of interest” is not the suspected shooter, but no one could produce a link confirming that assertion. The news anchors are all phrasing it like he’s the suspected shooter, which is fucked. Some ding dong in the PD’s gonna shoot a dude that they need for questioning (if they manage to find him when the whole city saw nothing)

  • @Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The assassin looks like he is wearing a black windbreaker style jacket and the other guy looks like he is wearing a cream colored dickies jean jacket with the grey hood like you get from walmart

  • @SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    65 months ago

    Im very faceblind, but hes more broad shouldered in the right pics that Im not seeing in the left pics. Also, whats going on with that cheekbone in top right pic and why dont you see it in any other pics?

  • Alice
    link
    fedilink
    105 months ago

    Honestly one looks like a very famous Podcaster and the other looks like a woman to me

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      That reminds me they didn’t put this much effort into finding the woman who put the bombs at the RNC on Jan 5th.