• 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    1772 years ago

    It’s chromium, it does that ambient color changing shit I hate, it “anticipates my needs” instead of just waiting my my instruction. This is a browser designed to make me angry.

    • @qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago

      I tried it for a bit, even daily drove it on my laptop for a while. It has a pretty slick interface, and uses containers so you could, for example, have one container that you are logged into your google account for (say, Youtube), and the rest of your containers you can not log into Google.

      The downside is that 1) It’s still not mature as of a month ago. They are making massive changes and adding new features constantly, and 2) It’s still Chromium, so all of the downsides of that are still present.

      If they switch to using Firefox or another open-source foundation, I’d be all over it.

      • @otacon239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        552 years ago

        Firefox already has containers. I still have yet to see a browser that beats stock Firefox in functionality, customization and privacy

        • godless
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          On mobile I’d suggest Fennec instead of stock Firefox since you can use add-ons without limitation, and don’t need workarounds such as the Firefox nightly.

          It’s basically stock with enabled add-ons, and following the official release cycle with 2-3 days delay. Maintained by the original developers of the F-Droid store, so also a highly trustworthy source IMHO.

          • @medicake@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Thanks for the heads up. I run FF on all my mobile devices so it will be nice to have access to all the addons.

            • @abhibeckert@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              Chrome is run by a massive corporation with a reputation for for invasions of privacy. Opera is run by a nation state with a reputation for invasions of privacy.

              Vivaldi is far better than either of those.

              • @The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I’m talking about first and third party websites tracking you. I don’t use Chrome or Opera, but I’d rather only have to trust a browser of my choice, than having to place my trust in thousands of different websites.

                The point is, if you care about tracking and privacy, you shouldn’t be using Vivaldi in the first place.

            • @AndreTelevise@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              PrivacyTests makes it look like Brave is the only browser you should be using simply based on how good it is at blocking trackers by default. Brave is good, but it has it’s fair share of flaws from UI and terrible syncing to built in crypto and NFT stuff.

          • @otacon239@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This is the key. There are a few projects that can beat it in one way or another, but not all 3. Every project that beats FF in a functional way ends up sacrificing privacy. And those that somehow beat it in privacy are underdeveloped and run into weird compatibility issues or are missing support for key plugins.

        • That’s what I’m using now. I think Arc does a better job of organizing containers and tabs, but it’s not worth the privacy/advertisement issues that come along with Chromium.

      • @tombuben@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        The issue is that Firefox is, as far as I know, much much more difficult to simply use as just the “rendering engine” for some other customized browser.

        There’s the arcfox experiment thing that tries to make firefox look and feel the same as arc, but if arc isn’t mature, then this thing is just simply unusable to almost everyone. It’s still probably easier to do than to make a completely new browser using firefox as a base though.

    • @abhibeckert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      No, it’s not a fork. A fork is when you take the Chromium browser and change it.

      This uses the same rendering engine as Chromium - but the browser itself was built from scratch, uses a completely different architecture, and on other operating systems it doesn’t use Chromium at all.

      As for “forced to create an account” Arc is temporarily free. Longer term you’ll have to pay a subscription to use it. So it makes sense that you need to sign up.

      • Semmelstulle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 years ago

        And you’re forced to create an account to use it. At least it did a few months back

  • ChrisFhey
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    Chromium and excellent do not belong in the same sentence.

  • @Jarmer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    682 years ago

    From the article:

    “The company is also thinking about how to integrate AI into the browser.”

    LOL - how absurd. I can’t even tell if this is a real product or just a meme?

  • @borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    It’s just chrome with different pitched bells and whistles.

    Give me some WebKit based alternatives or something interesting…

  • @OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    anyone

    Lol, it’s just on mac. No windows version or even plans for a Linux one. Not that I’d use another chromium fork.

  • dinckelman
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    I’ve attempted to understand what makes this browser good, time after time, and I still just don’t get it. They claim that they’ve ripped out the UI and created it from scratch, to improve workflow and how we approach browsers, but it’s done nothing but infuriate me, because they just built a gesture based interface with layers upon layers of hidden stuff, none of which is intuitive, and it’s for the desktop. Not to mention the other blunders with their extensions

  • Lionir [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    The organization features that I’ve seen look really nice. I’ve also wanted something as easy as Safari tab groups… None of these ideas seem to trickle down to other browsers though, it’s a shame