Twitter filed a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate. “Despite our continued progress, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and its backers have been actively working to assert false and misleading claims encouraging advertisers to pause investment on the platform. X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers. Through the CCDH’s scare campaign and its ongoing pressure on brands to prevent the public’s access to free expression, the CCDH is actively working to prevent public dialogue,” the company said in a blog post Monday.

“Musk and his legal team, led by attorney Alex Spiro at Quinn Emanuel, have engaged in an aggressive campaign to intimidate, bully, and silence CCDH,” the organization said in a statement released Monday. “While Elon Musk proclaims to be a ‘free speech absolutist,’ his actions against CCDH show the lengths he will go to silence those who seek to hold him to account.”

    • @aranym@lemmy.nameOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Musk uses that term in his own way - the “free speech absolutist” line came from him talking in reference to Twitter moderation. He consistently claims to allow his critics to say whatever they wish without consequences.

    • @Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Yeah, seriously. Anyone who pays attention know that the new Twitter with the new X might as well have been a Swastika or the cross of a Confederate flag, so what the research group is claiming to have data on isn’t really news at all.

      But him making a lawsuit out of it makes it much more likely that this will be reported and mentioned across most of the western world, your parents might even hear about it.

      • @punseye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Just a correction, Hitler and Nazi party never used Swastika, the original name of the symbol was “Hakenkreuz” in German.

        There is no mention of the word “Swastika” in any of the writings and speeches of the Nazi party.

        Hakenkreuz was wrongly translated to Swastika when the translation was carried out in English from German.

        The correct translation of Hakenkreuz in English would be “Hooked Cross”.

        Swastika is a similar looking sacred Hindu and Buddhist symbol, maybe because of it’s similarity this error occurred and it went unchallenged in international forums as Hindus and Buddhists didn’t even know how their sacred symbol was misappropriated and misrepresented because of mistranslation.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      It’s not a public service. It is a service offered to the public. That is something completely different.

      • @Marruk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That’s how defense of this stuff always works. They subtly change the meaning of commonly accepted words and terms. “Service available to the public” becomes “public service” and “Nazis are good” becomes “an opinion” instead of hate speech.

    • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      **’X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers.‘

      What do you think this changes about the discussion in any way? X being ‘free’ or not matters not one whit while they platform nazis and white supremacists.

      ‘the CCDH gained access to X’s data without Brandwatch’s authorization.’**

      This seems like a problem for Brandwatch to address with the CCDH more than an issue for X. X’s concern should be whether or not they’re hosting nazis and white supremacists. If X has any concern, it ultimately comes to the poor way Brandwatch secured the data.

    • @Marruk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      The real problem here is that Twitter/X user’s data can be easily revealed by organizations.

      The publicly posted data being easily revealed by organizations is a problem?

    • @Haibane@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      352 years ago

      They are whining about the fact that an anti-hate organization… browsed twitter. They didn’t hack them. They didn’t do anything scary. They just used the publicly available data to make a report. If that is illegal then simply browsing twitter is also illegal. It’s a public website.

  • AgentOrangesicle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Assuming they’re relying on established metrics… good luck with your trashfire-smokescreen of a libel case?

  • @Justice@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    482 years ago

    “Your honor, my defense rests on one simple principle: you can’t defame the dead. Elon Musk killed Twitter last week. That is all.”

    But on a serious note, Elon is a fucking baby however these cases typically get tossed out basically instantly for being baseless. His intent is likely to make future researchers or just non-anonymous people everywhere never speak the MEAN truth about his stupidity or suffer bullshit law suits. He has the infinite money, it’s not like he cares if a court orders he pay all the fees for wasting time. Normal people can’t accept that risk though or the time off work to deal with it. Basically, he should face imprisonment for a long fucking time to deter HIM from this bullshit. Or, I dunno, seize all his ill gotten capital, I dunno.

    • @Cabrio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      It’s a game of stupid chicken, because the moment someone actually goes to court instead of settling he’s just given them a platform to prove how much of a dipshit he is.

  • @Z4rK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    To moderators: if the mega thread style doesn’t work, could we consider splitting out Musk-news to some other community? The topics comes rapidly and gain a lot of interest, but it’s such a narrow perspective on technology and just drowns other news.

    • @Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      At least on Reddit I used RES filters to block all posts with certain people in the subjects. Cuts down on a lot of low-effort gossip from people hate-posting news.

      • Scew
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        low-effort gossip from people hate-posting news

        Thank you for the terms. Couldn’t find them anywhere. Made it hard to fit my comments in with communities not realizing this was the meta.

      • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Why would people who want to talk about Twitter/X even go to a community created by people who want to see less of it? We consider this Technology news.

        • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          The name is a way of acknowledging that people are tired of hearing about him. It’s (I think; I didn’t create it) saying, for those who want to read about this asshat but without spamming other channels, not no one cares about this.

          • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I am also tired of him but what can I do if he keeps doing newsworthy bulshit? I’m not going to go to a community just about him, because I’m not that personally invested in him, but I also don’t think talking about current relevant events involving him is “spam”, particularly when it comes to Twitter.

  • @Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -32 years ago

    Let’s ignore how retarded hate speech is as a concept for a second and think about this from a simple point of view. Organizations like CCDH, ADL, SPLC, and so on serve no value to society. They don’t offer products, services, and they don’t help anybody. Their job is justify their own existence, and they do so by publishing bullshit under the guise of morality. If you ever looked at their publications it always nonsense. It is either hyperpartisan bullshit that seeks to censor opposition, hyperbalized claims that aren’t sourced, or made up solutions that aren’t backed by any evidence. All these non profits are run the same. They’re run by fraudulent figures who make money by coercing institutions into donating to them in hopes of gaining credibility and avoiding a slander campaign against them. It’s basically a ponzi scheme with elements of extortion. Fuck them. As much as I hate Musk and Twitter, these parasitic organizations are 1000x worse.

      • @Mdotaut801@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        He’s operating off the notion that any publicity is good publicity. Hopefully it works but the guy has so much money that he won’t be going away anytime soon (or ever). It’s too bad that he’s such a cunt, he could have done great things but he was raised as a cunt as well so it’s kind of hopeless.

  • @aranym@lemmy.nameOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    167
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The CCDH do not have the resources to fight Twitter alone. This is clearly an attempt to scare them into silence with legal fees.

    Those who wish may donate here.