Vulnerabilities in Sogou Keyboard encryption expose keypresses to network eavesdropping.

  • @3arn0wl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -202 years ago

    The most popular Western OS (and probably the other commercial OSs too) sends every key typed back to base. Plus every website visited. Plus every document amended.

    • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Any sources for this? I know Windows and probably MacOS send analytics but every keystroke and every document amended seems unlikely to me, maybe I’m wrong though.

        • @HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The timeline feature on Windows that shows your info across devices when your account is signed in, contains websites, apps and services. They say you can see it for 30 days, but I doubt they delete it after, even if they say they do. They probably at minimum process the meta-data.

          I don’t see why c/technology scream about privacy violations every other post, and then suddenly turn forgetful when geopolitics comes into play. I used to watch ‘exposés about China’ and anti-sjw stuff on youtube back in 2015 too - and then just as I stopped watching them, they became an ‘official geopolitical enemy’. The last decade has been a ride.

          • @Landrin201@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Because all the sinophobe tech bros have migrated to Lemmy and don’t actually understand the shit they’re talking about. They think the tech THEY use is super cool and want to keep using it, and also think China is scary and an imminent threat to them sitting in their gamer chair surrounded by doritos.

            • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              Or maybe, just maybe, people have been packet sniffing Microsoft’s shit for ages and haven’t found them to be doing things quite as egregiously. Go ahead, you can look this shit up.


              Most of the spying features in Windows are able to be explicitly disabled through options Microsoft publishes themselves. It’s Group Policy, only available on Pro licenses, but anyone concerned about privacy should be on that anyway or spoofing their license using again, Microsoft published techniques (KMS). There’s also often registry keys to toggle it as well, but they tend to not be as reliable and change over updates.

              There are also tons of ways to strip out entire components of Windows from the install media before installation, and also after it has been installed. Can’t collect telemetry “X” if the telemetry “X” service isn’t there.

              Lastly, host file allows blocking network traffic to specific endpoints, and the very few times Microsoft has bypassed that it has made news. You can just block Microsoft’s entire IP block through host if you’re really paranoid.


              Beyond that, I’ve seen plenty of people concerned about the US’s data collection. It’s just not always spoken about as a US thing but more as a general tech thing, likely because internet discussion is still very US centric outside the great firewall and most big tech in the English speaking world comes from the US. So i think the US connection often just goes without saying.


              I’ll give you this: framing much of this as related to any nation state instead of just all tech’s hoovering up of data is disingenuous.

              Also, if your threat model truly needs to be concerned about any nation state actors specifically then you’re probably already fucked.

    • Magnor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      Not that it would surprise me in any way, but do you have a source for this claim?

    • TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You know, network sniffers exist. You can verify if this is true yourself if you know how to use one. Kill all other network services and just start typing and see if it starts spewing packets.

      The internet is not some black box where us regular users can’t see what’s going on.

  • @demonsword@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -182 years ago

    Looks like very few people have actually read the article, and that the cancerous anti-China sentiment migrated from reddit to lemmy too.

  • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2572 years ago

    Alright China shills, you can stop changing the subject to how Google and the US are the “same”.

    The troops advanced into central parts of Beijing on the city’s major thoroughfares in the early morning hours of 4 June and engaged in bloody clashes with demonstrators attempting to block them, in which many people – demonstrators, bystanders, and soldiers – were killed. Estimates of the death toll vary from several hundred to several thousand, with thousands more wounded.[15][16][17][18][19][20]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

    If you lived in China you’d likely not know about this, since people who talk about it go to prison.

    Yeah the US is exactly like this so let’s not talk about the Chinese government being awful to their citizens /s

    • @Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -152 years ago

      The troops advanced into central parts of Beijing on the city’s major thoroughfares in the early morning hours of 4 June and engaged in bloody clashes with demonstrators attempting to block them, in which many people – demonstrators, bystanders, and soldiers – were killed.

      Here’s a video of an interview with Chai Ling recorded on May 28, 1989 with reporter Philip Cunningham. Chai Ling was arguably the most influential leader of the student protesters at Tiananmen Square. In the interview she openly wishes for the soldiers to massacre the students after her instrumental role in blocking attempts by other activists to move the protest back to campuses, all while refusing to sacrifice herself.

      Notable quotes from this interview include:-

      “You, the Chinese are not worth my struggle. You are not worth my sacrifice”

      “The students keep asking what shall we do next? What can we accomplish? I feel so sad, because how can I tell them what we’re actually hoping for is bloodshed - for the moment when the government has no choice but to brazenly butcher the people?”

      “Only when the square is awash with blood will the people of China open their eyes. Only then will they really be united”

      “If we allow the [protesters] movement to collapse on its own, then the government will be able to wipe out all the leaders of the movement”

      Upon being asked if she will stay in the square herself after urging the students to stay she simply responded, “No, I won’t”.

      When the Tiananmen Square incident erupted in violence on June 3rd, Chai Ling escaped from Beijing by train. She was eventually smuggled to Hong Kong via Operation Yellowbird, an MI6/CIA led initiative to extract dissidents who they hoped would form the nucleus of a “Chinese democracy movement in exile”. To my knowledge, no details exist about how and when she made contact with them. She was subsequently invited to study at Princeton on a full scholarship due to her pivotal role in the Tiananmen protests. She studied Politics and International Relations there, eventually picking up an MBA from Harvard. Today, she runs an internet company called Jenzabar that she founded with her husband, the lawyer Robert Maginn, a long time associate of the Republican party, having even served as the chairman of the Massachusetts Republican party between 2011 and 2013. Their company serves more than 1300 higher education institutions worldwide, whom they provide with ERP software.

    • XIIIesq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That’s false equivalence.

      China killing protesters and silencing dissidents does not make it OK for Google or anyone else to spy on you.

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Sir this is a Wendy’s

      Or more specifically, a thread about a phone keyboard.

      But it is true that Google and Microsoft phone home with your key strokes. That’s how they develop their predictive typing and autocorrect.

    • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      If you can’t see the fundamental intertwining of Google (or any other fortune 500 company) and the US State, then you should really start looking harder. Lobbyists, revolving door membership, corruption, tax writeoffs, corporate power being used to influence day-to-day life, really, US companies’ control over the US state is pretty similar to the Chinese State’s control over Chinese Companies. I just don’t think corporations should be in charge like y’all seem to.

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      No one is saying Google massacred protestors, but if you’re gonna be against keyboard apps spying on you it should be irrelevant who they’re spying for. Criticizing shitty things American companies do doesn’t make you a China shill and calling everyone who does it a China shill is intellectually dishonest.

      • @Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        452 years ago

        Imagine being in Taiwan and having full access to information about China and the west and still shilling for China. Those types of people should be looking for a dominatrix, not a political philosophy…

        • RoundSparrow @ .ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Imagine being in Taiwan and having full access to information about China and the west and still shilling for China. Those types of people should be looking for a dominatrix, not a political philosophy…

          That’s kind of the history of humanity regarding religion. To some degree when the religious prophets were alive it make sense, but hundreds of years later it’s a story book (or oral tradition) and people still strive for the authority.

          We haven’t really had that many teachers like Carl Sagan who describe the history and our favoring of authority - inability to question them. It’s pretty weird, as they often aren’t attractive or good speakers, but you see people just accept almost anything they say. I mean in the USA I witnessed so many people who would trust Rush Limbaugh and Alex Jones kind of blindly, and there is some mechanism at play that humanity in total seems to keep engaging.

        • @evilgiraffe666@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          532 years ago

          I think they might be using “mainland Taiwan” as a way of saying China - Taiwan is an island which China thinks is “theirs” for some reason.

            • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The politicians have to play nice and be polite. Right up until they don’t have to anymore.

              The people can recognize that Taiwan is what happened to the last freely elected government of Western Taiwan, and that the CCCP are nothing more than despots and authoritarian tyrants that freely abuse their own people, and would absolutely be bullying the world, if they were actually as powerful as they claim to be.

              The CCCP ≠ China or the Chinese people.

              The CCCP = Western Taiwan

          • @miserablegit@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -22 years ago

            Tbf, it was theirs - until it wasn’t. At this point, it is a bit like the British were insisting that the US was theirs.

            • @ylph@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The history of Taiwan is quite a bit more complex than that, but the PRC (current government in mainland China) has never controlled Taiwan - it was never theirs.

              Taiwan was a Japanese colony from 1894 until 1945 when Japan was forced to hand it over to the ROC (the successor government to the Qing dynasty, which was the last time you could argue China controlled the island - the Qing managed to almost fully colonize it before losing it to the Japanese, although a lot of the mountainous parts of Taiwan were still mostly autonomous at that time and inhabited by aboriginal Taiwanese who continued to resist the Qing rule)

              The ROC takeover of the island is also seen as another colonization by many Taiwanese as well - the descendants of the Qing era colonists who were mostly Hokkien speakers from Fujian, while the ROC migration in 1949 was mostly Mandarin speakers from wider China, who fairly brutally imposed their rule over the island (see 4 decades of martial law, etc.)

              ROC managed to reform itself over time, and Taiwan is now a vibrant democratic country which is forging its new national identity where most people would prefer to be left alone to control their own affairs.

              • @miserablegit@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                92 years ago

                “Taiwan” was never the administrative centre of China, come on. Some of the Chinese ruling classes fled there after the revolution. It’s like saying the capital of Germany was always Bonn.

          • @SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            “Yes, but history…” they will say.

            And in history China used to be the opium export market of the Brits so by historic rules it has to be that again. I guess they’ll say “but that’s different”.

      • @Hype@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Been using lemmy for a few days and I am already feeling the need to do just that.

    • @gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean, ill always say that China is worse than the US. But you can find plenty of examples of the US doing awful things to its people too.

      Like the MOVE bombing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_MOVE_bombing

      or The Tusla Massacre that involved law enforcement bombing black neighbourhoods https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_massacre

      Or any of the countless of times cops perpetrated mass violence against black people during the civil war era and cracked down harshly on protests.

      Or when the did the same to anti-war protestors during the vietnam war.

      Or the numerous times they experimented on their own citezens such as MK ultra, The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, or any of the dozens upon dozens of radiation experimentation, like when almost 1000 pregnant mothers were injected with radioactive iron, causing many miscarriages and cancers(and thats not the only time they injected pregnant mothers with radioctive material to see if it fucked up the baby), or when inserting radium rods up the nostrils of school children and then observing how their health declined, or when they dosed hundreds of inuit with radioactive iodine to see its affects on the thyroid.

      Like I dont think this makes China’s atrocities any more excusable, but the reverse is true to. The US really isnt much better than China.

      • @bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Don’t forget operation sea spray! Next time you laugh at someone talking about chemtrails remember the us government actually did chemtrails!

        • @gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 years ago

          Do you even know what the word shill means?

          Like wtf do you think I’m trying to sell?

        • @June@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          352 years ago

          I tend to lean into accepting that ‘the US government has done some pretty horrific shit too’ camp, but I don’t do it as a way to shill for China, because fuck that authoritarian place. But it is dumb not to recognize massacres like Kent State, Tulsa, or the systematic genocides of First Nations peoples.

          Tiananmen Square really isn’t the best example to use as an example of how China isn’t like the US. There’s plenty of much more insidious dystopian shit happening in China every day to use than that.

          • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            this article isn’t about the US. I believe there is a reason so many in so many threads like that do what you’re doing and worse. THE TOPIC IS NOT THE US, STOP TRYING TO MAKE IT THAT WAY

            • @hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 years ago

              I think it’s a response to how there are so many CHINA BAD articles. You could take each article as isolated, but there is the idea of manufacturing consent and it’s how people develop negative feelings towards particular things after seeing so many negative articles about them.

              • @HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -12 years ago

                Well, you can post all the bad shit the US has done.

                China IS A BAD ACTOR on the international, national, regional, and Municipal levels. The whole state apparatus is corrupted.

                • @hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -22 years ago

                  It’s a lot more quick for me to point out that it’s not unique to China. The way you phrase the second part of your post is as if China is unique in this sort of corruption. The US is just as corrupt, plus it has a lot more influence around the world thanks to the sheer amount of resources it controls.

            • @June@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              I’m not trying to change the subject from China to the US, I’m trying to point out that the example of Tiananmen Square is not the best example to use as a distinguishing factor for China vs the US when there are numerous examples of the US commuting similar atrocities throughout its history.

              The current and active oppression and genicide of the Uyghurs.

              The brutal silencing of political and ideological ‘dissidents’.

              The openly dystopian social credit system being developed.

              The suppression of free speech and self-expression.

              There is a long list of examples to pull from that set China apart from the US.

            • archomrade [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              142 years ago

              Jesus Christ, this thread is cursed.

              Circling back to the article: it would be easier to name software that doesn’t collect your data and send/sell it to your respective government. The point being made in this thread is that it isn’t just a China problem. If you think you’re safe from government observation just because you don’t live in China, I have bad news for you.

              • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -62 years ago

                If you think you’re safe from government observation just because you don’t live in China

                I think you know without doubt that this is something NO ONE ever ever ever said. You know this. And yet still – you want to make this about the united states. Maybe you can explain a way that this got brought up without China shills infecting the thread?

                Because the article is not about the US. It’s not.

                • archomrade [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  82 years ago

                  I didn’t mention the US.

                  The article makes it sound like it’s UNUSUAL that a phone app is spying on its users and sending user data to the government. It’s not an exception, it’s the rule. People pointing this out are doing you a favor, because the article’s framing would otherwise lead you to believe this is a China problem and not a tech problem.

            • P03 Locke
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              It’s called Whataboutism. Very common deflection tactic.

      • @TheHighRoad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        As bad as those two linked incidents were, they weren’t exactly government sanctioned. Police sanctioned, sure, and the government should do more to reign that shit in, but comparing them to Tiennamen is disingenuous at best.

        The Chinese government hates letting its citizens have a voice.

      • @Stahlreck@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 years ago

        The US really isnt much better than China.

        The world ain’t just good or bad and there’s various degrees of “bad”. The fact that many US people can even talk about this stuff makes them already just ever so slightly better for many outsiders. This is how it is, neither country is “good” but they align more with western ideals than an authoritarian state which for many of us is bad by default…which it is of course. :)

      • @gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -112 years ago

        Imagine thinking China is worse than the US when the US killed something like a million Iraqis, and that’s just one of the many war the US was waging in the last 30 years while China checks notes attacked nobody in that timeframe.

    • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      This “they’re all bad” shit aimed at the Chinese government makes me so sad. How many of you dullards have even heard of Tienanmen square

        • @addie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          It’s not called the ‘Tiananmen Square’ by the Chinese - that’s just the name of the place. Either 六四屠殺 (June 4 massacre) or 六四鎮壓 (June 4 crackdown) would be more likely. And yes, expect loads of downvoting on Lemmy if you’re ever critical of China.

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      While GBoard is closed source, they have documented that they use federated learning. Meaning their model is generated on-device and only the inferences are sent to Google.

      That being said, I use OpenBoard.

    • Engywook
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Not if you block internet connection at system level. I think it can be done if GBoard in installed as an user app, not as a system one.

        • Engywook
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Of course. My “problem” is that I need to write in 3 languages at the same time and switching languages manually in Open board is a bit cumbersome, while in GBoard it happens automatically.

    • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Every single time something sketchy is happening in Chinese tech a Lemmy user will slide the conversation and accusations to American tech. It’s a rule.

      • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Well, we have actual evidence here of dodgy shit happening, but what about this other thing I assume is also happening based on absolutely nothing? See, both just as bad!

      • @ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        Is not about American/Chinese government, is about privacy. ANY company or government storing your data can be extremely problematic in the future.

        Yeah the Sogou Keyboard send data to Tencent, the same thing happens or could happens with others proprietary keyboards in the future. How about trying a FOSS one?

        • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s absolutely about the American/Chinese government, I don’t see comments forum sliding into Chinese tech on every post about Google.

          But no, swift and gboard don’t send your data to the American government.

          There’s also a dangerous misconception around here that FOSS == privacy safe. It doesn’t.

          • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            There is also a differece between invading your privacy and compromising your security. Both are bad, but one is much worse at least in my view. Keylogging and then sending those keystrokes back to base with a dodgey custom rolled encryption framework is not just a breach of privacy.

      • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        On all social media, that seems to happen and it makes me sick.

        People not knowing how scary the Chinese government is speaks volumes about the future of other countries. We had all the opportunity to see it happen and avoid it and these morons dismiss the truth and whatabout every damned thing

    • Lee Duna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I prefer OpenBoard, it doesn’t send keystrokes to any server

      • @august_senpai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        The fork even has support for swipe, autocorrect, word prediction, clipboard management, etc, and is way more lightweight than Gboard and the rest. Zero reason to use anything else at the moment.

      • @supercheesecake@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I’m not sure if that’s true. You know, it’s Google. Every keystroke in your gmail email is analysed, so can’t imagine gboard is any different to them.

        • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Any data you submit to Google is stored and analysed. That’s different from sending keystrokes as they happen though.

          I’m all for criticising invasive data use and collection which Google is definitely guilty of. It’s not the same as keylogging though which is not just a privacy concern but a pretty serious security one as well. Also we have actual evidence here of Tencent doing this which makes a difference to me at least.

  • Herr Woland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 years ago

    In a surprise to absolutely nobody, China spies on their people.

  • reflex
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Jeremy Clarkson:
    The Chinese are very good at this sort of thing.

  • @waterbogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    This is news? I would have been extremely surprised if it wasnt. This is normal for China, the CCP is eavesdropping on everything

  • Cool Beance
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    I feel like there should be a Lemmy version of everything now

  • @punseye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    652 years ago

    As if other keyboard apps are any different, I don’t think Microsoft bought SwiftKey just for fun?!

  • @sndrtj@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -62 years ago

    So when the Chinese do it it’s scary, but when the Americans do it it’s just “established practice”?

  • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The people here acting like their Gboard doesn’t do the same is so funny.

    Edit : never used nor installed tiktok.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Google doesn’t sell to data brokers. Not yet at least. They have a competitive advantage they will lose if they sold their data (our data) to third parties, especially third party resellers. If/when they begin circling the drain, that may change.

      • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -272 years ago

        Even if i had it, do you honestly think i would waste my life to be completely forgotten and left to rot for disclosing it like Snowden. Yep, no one will ever reveal anything after that shit show.

      • @knock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        I mean he’s not wrong, but also not really the same thing. Gboard does send a substantial amount of data about the things you typed to google. It is supposedly anonymous, but they do this to get anylitics, and they use this data to improve the suggestions given to you.

        There has been at least one article where someone intercepted the data leaving from Gboard and found it’s either unencrypted or just hashed into something like base64. This was a while back so things hopefully changed.

        While google does try not to phone home users passwords, how can you tell what is and isent private?

    • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      I’m going to guess you’re one of the people who defends tiktok and compares it to every other social media app by saying the US government is basically the same as the Chinese government

      • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I don’t think this post is a defence of China, its a damning of the invasive governments, which the US also has.

        It’s a warning that we are one step away from China, and should do something about it.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          No it’s not a “warning,” it’s just boring old whataboutism.

          The first part of your comment is like a textbook example of the fallacy.

          • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            It seems to be a very common fallacy in geopolitics to believe that a rival of the US must automatically be morally better. You see plenty of “left wing” imperialism defenses that blame Ukraine for the invasion and insist they should give up and do whatever Russia wants them to do.

            It’s apparently disappointingly complex for some people to believe that X can oppose Y and both of them can be horrible bastards. They can’t take criticism of China or Russia because they automatically see an implicit “America better” that’s not really there.

        • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It seems people can’t understand this. Am not American so i have an outside view that’s free from any patriotic feeling and the spoon fed propaganda since childhood.

        • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          What the fuck are you talking about? This has nothing to do with America, the problem here is you’re falsely equating a horrifyingly authoritarian government and basically writing it off as the “sAmE aS gOoGlE”

          • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -19
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I don’t know. What i read on Wikileaks made me believe they’re not that different you know. Go read it, it will open your mind.

            • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              162 years ago

              How many times has the US military ever murdered 900+ protestors in broad daylight then censored it from all media and imprisoned anyone who talks about it decades later?

              Educate yourself. Jesus fucking Christ.

              For the record I don’t need to read more about the US government corruption, that’s known. The fact that you’re comparing the two is disturbing af

              • @echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                if you wanted to make this a whataboutism is bad argument i’d be with you, but you’re still toeing the line of “oh but it’s okay when america does bad stuff, it’s not the same”

              • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Starting with the native American or i don’t count it ? I don’t know ? Is shooting a bus full of kids and laughing about it saying they’ll grow up to be terrorist anyway isn’t that far off and this is the tip of the iceberg buddy. USA is good at hiding murdering brown people by prefixing the word terrorists.

              • @Landrin201@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Several in fact. Most famously they bombed Tulsa oklahoma when black people there got too wealthy. But now multiple states are banning the teaching of it, alongside banning the teaching of our genocide of the Native Americans.

                We do most of our murder of innocent people these days abroad though which isn’t really much better, but most Americans are apparently completely fine with children being murdered so long as they aren’t white and they aren’t here, or they aren’t in an American school being shot by one of their peers.

      • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Not op, I know for sure that China’s been trying to grab as much intelligence as possible going as far as installing sniffing type software in network controllers and servers, and grabbing keystrokes from a keyboard is absolutely despicable and something they would do to grab more intelligence.

        The thing I have trouble figuring out is why in the hell people would care about TikTok. What signal intelligence is coming from my wife swiping through 14,000 cat and home organization videos.

        Location is turned off The app is sandboxed It’s not allowed to access the camera or the speaker without giving some minor notification that they’re on and people would notice.

        I totally get the China will do bad if they can but I fail to see the ultimate danger of TikTok.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          From “the olden times” (Reddit link):

          The type and scale of the data that TikTok collects is different than other Chinese apps.

          There will be replies that talk about advanced ML and predictive algorithms. There will be replies that talk about potential hacks the app can use to bypass iOS or Android policy. That’s a threat, sure, but we don’t even need to go there. We can just focus on the basic data that companies like Google, Meta and TikTok explicitly tell us that they collect in their privacy policy.

          Every time you open TikTok, you should assume that the Chinese government knows exactly where you are at that moment, because the app gives them access to your location through GPS. If you use the app frequently, they not only have time and location data, but they know your travel patterns too!

          They know who you interact with and who those people interact with. They know what kinds of content you like and what you dislike. They can use this information to intentionally feed you with disinformation in ways that make you more likely to believe it.

          The misinformation feed attack risk is not unique to TikTok. Others have already been misused in this exact way. The important difference is that when information is housed by companies like Meta and Google which are incorporated in the US, its use and storage is subject to US regulation. We can simply disallow use and storage of data and practices that we don’t approve of.

          If you’ve done something illegal or embarrassing on TikTok, it could be used to compromise you for a foreign nation’s interest. If you are a 20 year old wild child, they won’t have any interest in doing anything with that information right now. In a few decades, if TikTok continues its dominance in social media, China will have compromising information on an uncomfortably high number of powerful leaders and politicians. You don’t even have to do something obvliviously stupid like say something racist or admit to a crime in a DM. For example, with just location data they can know if a politician cheated on their spouse and with whom! Imagine a politician publicly saying that they did not meet with some business leader or politician about some scandalous thing. Well, in a world where everyone has TikTok, the Chinese government knows if that’s a lie or not. In theory Verizon/Meta/Apple wouldn’t know that since that data is purported to be anonymized. Even if they did have that information, it’s hard to imagine any US tech company using it for their own interest. A US company would likely not survive that kind of act - it would be corporate suicide. On the other hand, it is hard to imagine a foreign adversary NOT engaging in that type of blackmail when given the opportunity.

          Now consider companies like Tencent. How can information on League of Legends play sessions can be used to blackmail a politician, manipulate an election or foment widespread social unrest? It might be possible, but it’s not easy to think of how it could be done. With TikTok, it’s blindingly obvious how all of those things could happen.

          Most other Chinese apps don’t collect anywhere near as much personal and sensitive information. The ones that do collect the same level of sensitive data, like Tencent’s QQ, aren’t used by enough people where it would be realistic to speculate that this information can be used in a similarly widespread and extremely damaging way. Even then, the US government should seriously think through the damage that could be done with the information QQ collects by assuming the Chinese government has complete access to all collected data and hostile intent. With TikTok, you don’t need to spend more than a few seconds thinking about this to frighten yourself.

        • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I don’t know what you mean by sandboxed but I’m pretty sure it cannot be as private as it seems, even if you’re using a VPN. But regardless, 99.99% of tiktok users are not taking steps to protect their data. hundreds of billions of data points that help an authoritarian government know how people think is nothing to shrug at.

          • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Mobile apps aren’t in the wild west anymore. They don’t get access to the other apps and can’t wander around unlimited on your device without clear permission. If you say no location, they don’t get location. It used to be different, but apple and google are on the same page now and they don’t let apps abuse you without clear permission anymore.

            Even pulling your IP and giving them a vague city level location, They’re correlating that with liking 30 second random content videos and music. This isn’t even the level of intelligence you 'd get from FB or Youtube people aren’t searching tictok to see how to use software or edit code or how public infrastructure works. You’re getting organziation, cat videos, kids coming home from the dentist saying crazy things. I just don’t really see it as a big deal.

            • @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              you say all this and trillions of dollars still ride on their ability, which we very much knows exists, to stitch together billions of datapoints to know things about their users.

      • @Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Did you read it ? Can you share the part with relevant info. I tried to read it but it kept going abouts how Gboard and the Microsoft keyboard both gather huge amount of data and yet that both are opaque and you can’t know what data is sent to the server backend.

        Also, ever heard of 5,9 and 14 eyes ?

    • Paige (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1122 years ago

      It probably doesn’t though. Obviously it’s closed source making it harder to tell what’s actually happening, but there’s nothing stopping security analysts from looking at network usage and such. I would imagine that Google doesn’t install a keylogger on every Android phone, not out of the goodness of their hearts, but because they don’t want the bad publicity and lawsuits when it would inevitably be discovered.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        they do collect usage stats by default though.
        which include typed sentences passed through their ai model and words usage counts.
        it can all be turned off and gboard seems to respect these options. it doesn’t access online services unless requested with these options off.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          If you mean by “collect usage stats” train their AI model on-device and send the training result to Google, then yes. If you mean that the actual words get sent to Google’s servers, then no. There was a study shared recently that looked into this. Only metadata about what’s typed is sent. That’s not nothing of course, but it’s not what Tencent does at all.

          E: Found it.

  • @BoostWillis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Naomi Wu has literally been talking about pwnd Chinese IMEs for years in her sidechannel critiques of Signal.