• @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        162 years ago

        Have you tried developing your own web browser?

        The Web has become so complex, you need a huge team of talented developers to keep up with it, and for that you need a lot of money.

      • @MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        The harder and more complicated something is the bigger barrier to entry there is to competing against it.

        When video games were simple and fit on a single floppy disk or tape - a single person could develop an entire commercially released game. John Romero could make Dangerous Dave in a week or two, by himself.

        Now that games are like Grand Theft Auto V they require hundreds of millions of dollars to create with teams of hundreds of people over nearly a decade. The voice acting in motion capture alone cost many many times more than a game would cost to make in the '80s.

        The same goes with web browsers. Chromium is open source and free, it works well, so why spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to make your own new thing?

        What benefit did Microsoft get from spending all that money on EdgeHTML versus just using Chromium? None. That’s why they switched to Chromium.

        Oh… so to answer your question no one is “allowing” a few tech companies to denominate, just the complexity and cost of creating new products leads to these natural monopolies sort of forming. You’re free to spend the tens of millions of dollars to make your own browser if you want to and break up this domination. I doubt you’ll do it you’ll probably just use Chromium.

          • @Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Not on browsers, probably. It’s one of the areas where antitrust still has some echoes. They’ll probably pay you to stay afloat.

          • @Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Tech giants are buying everyone left and right because people don’t want to pay for these innovative products. Imagine paying a monthly subscription for Waze! Who would do that? Literally no one. Innovative products can’t exist without paying customers.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Software development is very expensive. And everyone just wants free stuff. Imagine the outcry if Firefox would drop revenue from Google search and switched to a subscription model a-la Adobe! People would literally lose their minds and call Mozilla Nazis.

      • @merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Robert Bork:

        He also became an influential antitrust scholar, arguing that consumers often benefited from corporate mergers and that antitrust law should focus on consumer welfare rather than on ensuring competition.

          • @merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah, it’s fine if you drive all your competition out of business, as long as the consumer "isn’t harmed"TM . But, of course, how are you going to prove that the consumer isn’t harmed?

    • exu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      Chromium/Electron is just super easy to integrate. Afaik Mozilla wanted to make Firefox more easily embedable as well, but that project was killed.

  • K Vinayak
    link
    fedilink
    -11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m watching The Spiffing Brit’s exploit live stream right now. Firefox cannot handle that. Edge can. On linux

    interesting

    Update: Alright. Fine! Its probably extension issue

      • K Vinayak
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Firefox Ram usage just kept going up during that stream for some reason. It was using 6GB of 8GB ram. Edge stayed at 2GB. The stream got boring after a while tho

        • Nora
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          One livestream shouldn’t be doing that. I think you got a messed up extension or something.

          • K Vinayak
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Its probably the emote extension. He has like 20k live viewers and no slow mode, all spamming emotes and random text

      • mihnt
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I just checked it out. Seems that The Spiffing Brit is trying to break youtube or something and is having people open as many tabs of his livestream as they can to get as many views as they can.

        • Nora
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          I just checked it out. And to test, I opened 15 tabs in firefox and refreshed. Just fine lol. Not sure what problem that person has besides maybe too many firefox extensions.

          • mihnt
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            I did the same and RAM usage on went up 20% for me. Using flatpak Firefox if that makes a difference. It’s still responsive though as I type this comment.

    • Sudoer777
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Didn’t they allow Microsoft telemetry through the tracking protection since they rely on Microsoft for all sorts of stuff despite their “avoid big tech” advertising? There’s so many better options, like Librewolf, Mullvad, Orion, Mull, even Brave if you really want a Chromium browser.

    • @johndc7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Pretty sure that’s chromium too. I’d rather just use Chrome though. I’m pretty sure duck duck go sells user data. At least with Google they tell you what they use your data for instead of acting like they are saving the world.

      Their entire business model is just reading Google’s TOS and finding some small detail to make a big deal out of that really means nothing.

      • @BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Duckduckgo doesn’t have anywhere near the capacity to collect data that google does, and their ads are keyword based, rather than being influenced by other data. Their search engine is really the only thing I’d recommend using however since their add-on and browser don’t offer anything that others don’t.

    • Objects in Space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I tried FF the other day instead of Vivaldi and I was like, no scroll wheel to switch tabs? No quick commands? No workspaces? Ugh I am prepared to keep using a chromium engine rather than give up all the “power user” features. It’s just sooo good.

      Been using gestures for so long I constantly catch myself using them in other apps where it doesn’t work and getting frustrated at myself.

      • @WatchMySixWillYa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        I know, right?

        I’m currently using both browsers, and I’ve been with FF for a very long time. But the things that come with Vivaldi from the very beginning make it my daily driver.

    • Kichae
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yeah, I use Vivaldi at work. I love it.

      It’s not on my personal devices, but if work is going to default to Chrome anyway, I may as well be using the best version of it.

      • @Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I went whole hog. The sync features are great between computer and phone app (phone app is excellent!) and they actively disable all the terrible shit from chrome. It works with bing/chat gpt too which is nice. They have been very vocal against Google proposed changes and I’m confident they will work around them if at all possible. If not, hell yeah, I’m jumping ship, but I give Vivaldi a lot of credit for what they’ve done this far. I’m hanging in there for now.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    542 years ago

    Mozilla doesn’t make it as easy to use the Firefox / Gecko engine in other projects, which doesn’t help for adoption.

    • @fuzzzerd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I’m way out of the loop, but is the issue that they actively make it difficult to use the rendering engine or is it that the cost to modularize it isn’t worth the payoff to Firefox itself? A subtle but important distinction IMO. I always felt it was the second, but maybe I was being dense?

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Back in the days it was possible to use Firefox engine to create apps. It was called XUL. Heck, Firefox itself was just a XUL app! But then they decided it wasn’t worth it for whatever reason and now their engine is tightly integrated.

        • @terkaz@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I believe it might be still possible with UXP - a hard fork made for Pale Moon project.

          Pale Moon is based on a derivative of the Gecko rendering engine (Goanna) and builds on a hard fork of the Mozilla code (mozilla-central) called UXP, a XUL-focused application platform that provides the underpinnings of several XUL applications including Pale Moon. This means that the core rendering functions for Pale Moon may differ from Firefox (and other browsers) and websites may display slightly different in this browser.

      • @planish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        They don’t try to make it difficult, but they make code changes that make it clear they have no concern for anyone who might be trying to use the engine anywhere other than in a retail build of Firefox, without providing things like deprecation warnings or upgrade paths.

  • A10@kerala.party
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    Firefox is kept alive by Google default search money AFAIK otherwise why don’t they sue google for showing different search results page in firefox

        • @Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          They do have an extension that forces the new search results page, but I’ve noticed it freezes the browser if I tap on an image result, so I have it disabled.

          • @gammasfor@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I completely forgot I had added that extension (back when Google actually looked ugly on Firefox on Android without it) just disabled and oh my god not only does it not freeze it actually feels usable again (I hate the weird AI suggested tabs at the top in the chromium UI).

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      We wanted HTML as complex as Adobe Flash. When we got it, the standard became so complex no way smaller players that didn’t dedicate massive resources to keeping up could possibly keep up.

      There was just no way to keep presto up to date with the ever evolving web without a massive new source of income for Opera.

  • @vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    It’s so sad that Presto didn’t get FOSSed.

    Technically it already depended on plenty of FOSS technologies, like gstreamer etc.

    We know this from the leak which allowed to compile a working browser.

    If only it was legally released, it would still be alive, I’m sure of that - there were even patches for the leaked source adding functionality and fixing bugs.