• Firefox offers better privacy and security than Chrome, with upcoming support for 200 new add-ons.

• While Chrome dominates, Firefox gains ground with user-friendly browsing experience and open-source model.

• Mozilla’s focus on user privacy and transparency challenges Google’s ad-centric approach, making Firefox a viable alternative.

  • Elias Griffin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Mozilla Foundation fronts Mozilla Corporation which is for-profit and brings in nearly a Billion in revenue.

    Don’t donate, do harden it.

  • @smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Have they addressed the security issues with sandboxing and site isolation and added a web view on android yet? I’d love to use Firefox on my phone too, but those issues were big enough for GrapheneOS to recommend against gecko-based browsers (though fortunately they provide their own de-googled chromium-based browser Vanadium):

    Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface. Gecko doesn’t have a WebView implementation (GeckoView is not a WebView implementation), so it has to be used alongside the Chromium-based WebView rather than instead of Chromium, which means having the remote attack surface of two separate browser engines instead of only one. Firefox / Gecko also bypass or cripple a fair bit of the upstream and GrapheneOS hardening work for apps. Worst of all, Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. This is despite the fact that Chromium semantic sandbox layer on Android is implemented via the OS isolatedProcess feature, which is a very easy to use boolean property for app service processes to provide strong isolation with only the ability to communicate with the app running them via the standard service API. Even in the desktop version, Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker (especially on Linux) and lacks full support for isolating sites from each other rather than only containing content as a whole. The sandbox has been gradually improving on the desktop but it isn’t happening for their Android browser yet.

    https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

    • @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’m using jerboa, and any links open in a firefox webview, with an option to (ninstantly, without reloading) opening the page in the firefox app directly

    • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I love GrapheneOS and they tried everything to make Chromium less shitty, but Vanadium still lacks fingerprinting protection as well as support for ad blocking. That’s why I use Mull, a hardened fork of Firefox, for everything except banking.

      • @smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Sadly there’s often a tradeoff between privacy and security (even though you often get one with the other), and GrapheneOS has always prioritised security

        • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I like Graphene as an OS, they also make great privacy improvements, e.g. they hide all unique device identifiers from apps in order to make you anonymous. You don’t have to use their pre-installed apps, I use Mull and Firefox Focus for everything except banking and other stuff that requires me to interact with payment processors, as they often flag or even suspend your account when using hardened Firefox.

  • grimacefry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Moved from Netscape to Firefox and never used IE or Chrome. I never understood the obsession with anything made by Google, glad its going to finally all fall apart for them.

    • @slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Same, I deeply regret leaving. Mostly happened due to peer pressure in uni, where everybody was thinking google is cool, and you had to use a lot of google products for classwork. Now google has their tentacles attached all over my online life, and switching feels like preparing for a divorce. Though at least I’m not using Android anymore

      • KptnAutismus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        you could’ve just degoogled your phone, if it’s comatible with any custom ROMs. android itself is open source, but the preinstalled apps and services are not. that’s where the spyware is. (we will never even know how much spyware is embedded in IOS, because it’s closed source)

        • @freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          No expert at all, but isn’t it the case that the phone is then somewhat marked as not trustworthy, making it impossible to use banking apps and such?

          • KptnAutismus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            from what i understand, it’s possible to re-lock the bootloader and use some kind of security patch to be able to do that. it’s definetely possible.

            • Elven_Mithril
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              unfortunately not all custom ROM are able to relock. You can off course use Magisk with Sygisk and then you can use your costum rom phone for bankig apps and google wallet. I am using one myself - https://lineageos.org/

    • @helmet91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Why is it such a big deal? I don’t regret anything. Back in the days when Google was a cool company and Chrome appeared, it totally made sense to use Chrome. After they gradually started to get more and more hostile, I switched to Firefox. It was just a matter of exporting and importing bookmarks and setting up some plugins. And changing the search engine.

      • Altima NEO
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I tried chrome when it released. It was a neat curiosity, but I never found it to perform so much better than Firefox that I needed to switch.

    • @sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      i feel like firefox used to suck

      or did chrome used to not suck so much?

      or was i a sucker for bandwagon and marketing

    • @Shaggy1050@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same here. I left for about 10 years but started coming back gradually a few years ago. After everything that happened this year, I made the full switch to Mozilla on all my devices. I’m very happy to be back though!

  • @recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use Firefox Focus as my default browser, and use that to “open in” Firefox if I want my session kept for any reason, or Chrome if it’s a Google related thing, sometimes.

    For almost everything I click through especially out of an app, Firefox Focus is fully appropriate.

  • @stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Firefox on desktop and mobile exclusively for a number of years now. I will say the experience isn’t perfect but it’s better than using a browser made by a company that is actively hostile to its users.

    It is important to take note that you will experience issues with some websites. For example, https://astro.build/ Try scrolling quickly up and down on this page on Firefox vs Chrome (on mobile).

      • @stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        A lot of people have been saying this, some have been saying it lags in chrome, and some have been saying it lags in firefox. I’m interested to know what device you have and perhaps what refresh rate your display runs?

      • @stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I honestly have no idea of the root cause. Different users are reporting different things. It seems to manifest differently for everyone. At a high level I would say it’s due to the use of a JavaScript framework as a purely static HTML/CSS only site should not be doing this.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      What’s wrong with that page? I’m not seeing anything in particular.

      • @tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Same

        Scrolling was a little jittery on both ff and Chrome for me, but the page has a lot of content on it, so I wouldn’t expect it run silky smooth on everything.

        • @stifle867@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I think because of the JS framework it’s using is causing performance issues. Ironic because the website claims 98/100 performance score - the highest of all those that they tested. It works perfectly smoothly on Chrome for me. A simple page like that should not lag/hitch at all.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It was a tiny bit jittery on the first scroll through the page but not very noticeable and it happened in both browsers anyway. That’s about it. I’m on an Xperia 10 III.

          • @stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            video is uploaded here

            sorry I wasn’t sure where to upload the video running a pixel 7 pro it’s hard to come across on video but it is there. hitching/jittery/lag on ff, perfectly smooth on chrome

            i’m surprised by the comments, everyone has been having mixed results

            • @HerrBeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I wonder if they aren’t using the “stop and look at image” - trick with css/js. So when you scroll you’re supposed to center on the next image. Also stops the scrolling to center

              • @stifle867@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Could be but I don’t think so in this case. It seems (based on no evidence - purely feel) that there’s some kind of event listener being triggered every time the page scrolls (whether this be touch/scroll event, visible contents, etc idk) and this event listener has different optimisation or performance characteristics depending on the device and rendering engine.

              • @stifle867@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Very strange! Everyone who has replied has had a different experience on this website. It’s probably an issue with the website, not Firefox per se. It simply manifests on Firefox for me personally.

    • @vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I’m scrolling an have absolutely no issues. Android 12 and Firefox 120.0b9 (Build #2015985090),

      • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Not OP but one thing I am missing, especially in mobile, is grouping tabs.

        Chrome auto groups your tabs, so if I open 5 Amazon links looking for something they are already sorted.

        For some reason Firefox doesn’t seem to get this feature

      • @stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Random performance issues

        Menu doesn’t open in landscape mode

        Tab overview page not working consistently - this one is hard to capture right now but what happens is when you have a large amount of tabs open (say over 30), when you hit the tab overview button it doesn’t take you to the currently open tab in the list, instead it takes you to the very top. This is not the normal behaviour. If you open and close it a few times it will randomly work properly 1/10 times.

        • @Scolding7300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Oh on Android I thought mostly for Desktop.

          Thank you for sharing. I experience more issues with mobile equivalent apps than their desktop counterparts

          • @stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Sorry for not clarifying. I tried to on other comments but this is also a post about Firefox Android specifically so I sometimes left that part out.

    • @mmagod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      exactly this…

      i started out in firefox back in early 2000s… then made the switch to chrome and never looked back…

      im not the biggest google-groupie but for me to make the switch, google really had to f up in my eyes… and they did

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Don’t forget about the Firefox forks like LibreWolf!

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        UBlock Origin mobile.

        uBlock Origin mobile with the EasyList annoyance cookie notices filter enabled. Never see an annoying cookie notice again.

    • @M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’ve used it very briefly and had no problems.

      Honestly, the differences between browsers performance is almost nothing. I’ve been a long time Firefox user and only ever encountered a compatibility issue once, but that was on a 3rd world countries government webpage for a small neighborhood.

      It was more likely that it was a bug.

          • @stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            it seems everyone has had completely different results! I’ve uploaded my experience here: video

            for me if you look closely, ff hitches and lags on scroll while chrome scrolls perfectly smoothly

      • yesdogishere
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        ive switched to firefox for desktop windows for about 1 year now. Firefox is really capable and as swift as chrome. You also get a sense of less intrusiveness. Firefox also has the multi containers widget, though for me it breaks down after a while. The big difference now between firefox and chrome are things like automatic subtitles for anything running in chrome. So if a youtube or other video has no english subs, Chrome can do it. And soon, Chrome i going to go AI too. I’m not sure how firefox will survive that onslaught. I suspect mozilla will have a firefox fork partnering with a major competitor of google (eg: MS).

        • @M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          I’ll admit that those features are useful, but it’s not enough for me to switch to chrome and give Google more control over the web.

          It’s like giving up the house to play with some toys.

    • @roro@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t accurately recognize tap on input gestures on Android. It’s super frustrating to paste text. Chrome has no problem here 😞

    • breakfastmtn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      FF is great for mobile with the exception of PWAs. They abandoned support for web apps - they work but performance is terrible. It’s a massively requested feature so hopefully they’ll add support soon. I use a chromium browser (Vanadium) for web apps but have links open in FF.

      • @edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        tjatsbautomaitxlsly

        I don’t know what’s more impressive, that terrible auto correct or that I can actually tell what you were going for there (hurray for context clues)

        • @can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Autocorrect had no hand in that I’m afraid. That mess is all me. My keyboard usually handles that kind of thing pretty well. Multiple words even

          • @stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            It was the distinct lack of autocorrect 😜 For years now I have disabled autocorrect for this reason. Yes, I still make some small mistakes here and there but it forces me to be careful with what I type and to quickly check before I send. That way I don’t have a situation where I’ve typed something expecting autocorrect to save me but it doesn’t.

  • @Redonkulation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    When Firefox announced that a ton of their add-ons/extensions were coming to the mobile app, it got me to switch from chrome after almost 15 years.

  • @EddieTee77@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Since version 120 is coming to mobile soon with about 200 extensions (as mentioned in the article), can anyone recommend some good extensions that are newly added? I have ublock origin, HD YouTube, Google search fixer, clear url fixer, dark reader, privacy badger, and ghostery

    • janAkali
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Try libredirect, it automatically redirects links from twitter, youtube, imgur and many other spying platforms to alternative privacy friendly frontends. It is also very customizable: you can turn only some redirects and configure what particular site to use for each platform.

      • @EddieTee77@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Good suggestion! I haven’t heard of this before and it seems like a great tool considering how much things have changed recently on these platforms

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      You don’t need Privacy Badger and Ghostery anymore if you turn the Enhanced Tracking Protection up to “strict” in settings.

      • @Swarfega@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ghostery has been great for denying cookie pop-ups. I don’t think this setting will replace this feature?

        Edit…

        Nevermind. I just read this comment which suggests uBlock Origin can also handle cookies!

        https://lemmy.ml/comment/5981058

      • @EddieTee77@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Oh even better! I would rather have settings in my browser instead of relying on extensions anyway. One of the many things I love about Firefox

    • @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If LibRedirect becomes available, then definitely that. Redirects links from at this point twenty different services to more privacy-friendly frontends

          • @yum@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I’m surprised I haven’t heard this before. Thanks! I will proceed to only use uBlock Origin from now on (although I really enjoy the auto-reject cookies)

            • Ace! _SL/S
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              uBlock can disable cookie popups, go to settings, filters and then scroll down to annoyances. Enable AdGuard Cookiebanners and Easylist Cookiebanners

            • lemmyvore
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s nothing wrong with it, it’s just not needed if FF blocks all 3rd party cookies outright. Privacy Badger was supposed to autodetect which 3rd party cookies were used to track you, there’s no point if they’re all blocked.

              If you have sites that need 3rd party cookies to work please note you can add exceptions in FF settings. I’ve seen instructions telling people to disable tracking protection altogether in that case but that’s a terrible idea.

            • @online@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Google rewrites links in Google search (not that you use it but maybe you do sometimes). So, if you want the links you click in Google search to not go through a Google referral URL and instead go to the link advertised in the search result, then Privacy Badger is useful for this purpose.

    • @TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      You can also drop ClearURLs filter. Better filters that are more up to date exists exists on uBlock like Adguard URL Tracking Protection and Actually Legitimate URL Shortener Tool.

      • @EddieTee77@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I wasn’t aware. It really seems like uBlock origin can do everything I had all those extra extensions for! Pretty impressive

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    831 year ago

    Just because Google broke the most trafficked site on the internet for Firefox doesn’t mean its a bad browser. Hell that’s a ringing endorsement.

    • N3Cr0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I didn’t notice they broke it. The website works on my Firefox as usual. Maybe you lack some plugins? (like ublock origin, sponsor block, age restriction bypass…)

    • @Plagiatus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I still don’t see that they broke FF specifically, they’re fighting back against adblockers, including the ones in browsers like brave.

        • @NekkoDroid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago
          1. Hasn’t been happening on my Firefox
          2. There have been reports on other browsers as well, so this isn’t a firefox specific issue (p sure I’ve seen some people that use chrome claim they had this issue)
        • Iron Lynx
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          From what I’ve gathered from other threads, it’s meant to target ad blockers, not Firefox users. It appears though that Firefox users ended up in the crossfire, while uBO can be rigged to block the sleep() function in that case, nullifying the wait.

    • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      Personally I’d rather stop using any Google services, than handing them a Chrome monopoly. Google is already way to dominant IMO.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        You should stop using Google services anyway. They are terrible for privacy and for your digital freedom in general. And there are so many alternatives.

        • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I absolutely try to limit it. I use Qwant for search. I don’t use gmail except to register Android. In android I don’t use google services like calendar. I only use Google play for 1 app that is only available through Google play.
          My biggest dependency is probably YouTube, which I must admit I use a lot.

          • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Qwant is a good option. AFAIK you can use Android without logging in to a Google account. You can use Aurora Store to anonymously download apps from the Play Store without having to log in. If you have to access Gmail, don’t use their app, it’s full of trackers. Use K-9 Mail instead. For YouTube, you can use LibreTube or NewPipe on Android and Invidious or Piped in your browser. SmartTubeNext is a great option for Android TV. You can also use the Universal Android Debloater to remove any Google apps and services you don’t need.

    • @vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      which site is that? Google search page? it works fine for me in every browser I’ve ever tried it on.