Decided I’d give a sneak peek at something I’m working on:

Since building my home server I’ve constantly been on the lookout for a decent frontend to manage my files, etc. I initially tried file browser, but it was always really buggy for me, and honestly I hated it.

Since my server is headless, a PiKVM and the like wouldn’t really work for me the way I wanted, so I decided to just build what I was looking for on my own.

And with that, I’d like to introduce: redox_os TBD

It’s an emulated OS built in react with a node+express backend. It’s made to be as fully customizable as you want. You can create new “apps” for it very easily. Anything you can make in react/JavaScript can be loaded as an “app” with just a simple config file.

It’s still very much a work in progress, but I figured it was complete enough for a little show and tell.

Current features:

  • a desktop with icons/etc
  • a file browser
  • text editor (complete with syntax highlighting)
  • a full featured terminal
  • a picture viewer
  • a music player
  • a video player (capable of live-transcoding to an html5 compatible format)
  • a file downloader (for downloading files to the server from the web)
  • full drag and drop capabilities (even drop files from outside your browser to upload)
  • downloading files from the server to local
  • full mobile/touch support

I’m also still very much deciding how to handle the release. It’s mostly functional already, but I’d really want it to be polished before a proper release.

Since I also have a full time job, that may take a while. Contributors would definitely help, but I’m also a little split on whether I should make if FOSS. I’m definitely leaning so, but idk.

Definitely open to any feedback, suggestions, criticism, etc.

Edit: Thanks to everyone for the feedback! Looks like I’ll definitely be going FOSS. Also I’ll be changing the name 😄

Not sure what to call it now though. Maybe reDOS? Lol

I still wanna tidy everything up a bit before making the code public. Maybe go back and start adding some comments/documentation as currently there is none. I’m really terrible about that.

Also definitely a bit shy to open up my code to public scrutiny haha. I’m sure there are plenty of mistakes and bad practices.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Wow I honestly had no idea something like this already existed! Never heard of ArozOS before.

      Why is it not more well known/discussed? I can see a million different use-cases for a web-based OS. I would have thought it would be the first thing people would talk about for a self-hosted solution to a os/frontend.

  • @Oisteink@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    This is awesome, I just want to point out that once you have a pikvm connected it’s no longer headless. That’s kinda the whole idea about any kvm - to provide screen(s), keyboard and mouse to servers so they’re no longer headless

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      So admittedly I’m fairly new to the world of self-hosting, but have been a web dev for a long time. My terminology may be way off here. I always sort of assumed that headless meant that I’m running a version of Linux that does not have a desktop UI (Ubuntu server specifically).

      If I added a PiKVM, would I suddenly get a desktop UI, or would it still be command-line only?

      • @Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Head-less is without screen (head). You’d need to install the desktop of choice. You only get a screen. It’s for server admin not daily use - even with a fancy one like that.

  • @ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    You’ve done a nice job in a short time. I’d give it a spin as a jump server sort of application I could use in a browser. I currently use KasmWeb for this sort of thing, because I like having a vanilla Linux experience in a browser, but it’s kinda heavy, though faster than something like VNC and easier to poke a hole in a firewall with basic auth for access.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thanks!

      Another reason for the project was that I too wanted a desktop experience while also being being able to access remotely. I just didn’t want to open any “scary” ports on my server lol. I can throw this whole thing behind 2fa and it’s still completely isolated in a docker container, thus it has as much or as little privilege as I want.

      I actually can ssh into my main server through this, if desired, without opening any ssh ports publicly.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I am serious, and don’t call me Shirley.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Definitely way less resource-intensive. I’m actually amazed at how quickly it spins up and loads everything. Even with all of these windows open, and streaming a full length movie, it uses less memory than a single YouTube tab.

  • @IceMan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I see you wrote that you’re thinking about making it FOSS. What’s the alternative? Paid software/non-free license + Open Source or proprietary? If you’re low on time and don’t have the capacity to maintain (bugfixes/reports from users) yourself then I say proprietary is a no-go. Then about the license - IMO (though I don’t have hard data on that on hand) people much more likely contribute to FOSS as opposed to locked in license + open source model.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Truly appreciate the feedback!

      I am definitely leaning open source, but to be completely candid, I could also see this being a marketable product. If I could somehow turn maintaining this into my full time job and quit my current job without any significant drop in my salary, I would be completely stoked.

      To be honest, I’m not super familiar with licensing or really anything regarding the release of software, but I would like to maintain the possibility that I could eventually sell/monetize it if it turns out to be a success, and I’m afraid that once it becomes FOSS, that possibility is gone.

      Like I said though, I honestly have no idea, so I would love any feedback or suggestions.

      • @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        AGPL + CLA would potentially be an option? Then you can sell licenses to those who want to make proprietary modifications. It seems to work for other projects.

        • mhredoxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I will absolutely look into this. Thank you :) definitely looks like I’ll be opening source though. I didn’t realize there were already so many FOSS alternatives. Suppose I should have done more research, but I guess I figured they would be more popular/ talked about on platforms such as this.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Not public yet. Still deciding how to handle release. This is just a sneak peek to gauge interest and get any feedback.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Link doesn’t work for me, but I’m starting to see what you mean.

      Either way, this has been a fun project to work on and I’ve only been working on it since around October, so not like years of commitment or anything. I’ve learned a lot, even having been programming professionally for years, so overall I’d say it’s been a worthwhile venture, especially considering I originally was only building this for myself.

  • Sisko Urso
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    This looks really exciting, looking forward to trying it out.

    • mhredoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh damn good call haha.

      I guess I never bothered to check. I’m not married to the name so it’s no big deal really. I was initially just building this for myself without any real plan to release anything so I chose my artist/producer handle and never thought twice about it.