• Cyrus Draegur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      it’s about to get EVEN MORE unusable, because increasingly the alleged/so-called “content” behind the nag-wall is utterly mindless AI-generated sludge.

      • @wishthane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Also so many sites that haven’t given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls… which I’m okay with in principle, but in reality I can’t afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally

        There’s going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn’t mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium)

    • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      I even install it on work computers. It’s not just plainly sexually explicit ads. It’s malware. Just say no to ads.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      It really has. Ublock is so versatile, too. It can block pretty much anything. I loathe using browsers without it installed.

  • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    I think the funniest part is that the browser even blocked some crap the site wanted to shove at you by default. This isn’t even the intended experience!

  • @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Vivaldi browser is good for sites like that because you can use simplified view, which removes all the shit and just gives you the article text.

    The Reading Mode app on Android does this too.

  • @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Absolutely, use an adblocker. You might even find that “reader mode” works just as well to force articles to be coherent.

  • Richard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I don’t get why some people just refuse to use ad-blockers. They work absolutely flawlessly and I have not encountered an experience such as this in almost a decade.

  • @Octopus1348@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I recommended you use an alternative browser like Samsung Internet, or a Chromium fork called Cromite (UI like Chrome but without Google services). They, along with Firefox, Edge etc. have ad blocker support.

    After finding one you like, go into Chrome’s app settings and click “Disable” in the middle, so Google Discover won’t force you to open in Chrome even if it’s not your default browser.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      With Firefox mobile now supporting plug-ins, it’s easily the best mobile browser. I think it’s the best desktop browser as well, but that’s more debatable.

      • @Tiefa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The ability to sync tabs from Firefox mobile to desktop and vice versa is a huge selling point of desktop Firefox use. I’m not well versed in the best desktop browsers but when I swapped three months ago to double Firefox I’ve been very happy.

      • @Octopus1348@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I tried it, but the best for me is Samsung Internet. I love that I can add tabs by holding the tab view button. It’s also quite customizable.

  • Rosco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Probably not worth the read anyways. I disable the adblocker to gauge the quality of a website. If it’s a complete ad cluaterfuck, I never go to the website again.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    not that bad compared to some websites I’ve seen before tbh

  • Kalash
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    A perfect example for why having an adblocker is a necessity these days.

  • @KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Chances are, unless you made the website yourself, you don’t know who made certain decisions; who did specific work; how many people were actually available to do that work; how much pressure from shareholders there was to maximize income at the expense of user experience; any fiduciary challenges faced; or how often you had to overcome the urge to make a worthwhile product to further your goal of fitting as much ad space into a single page as possible (this one is HUGE).

    • Cyrus Draegur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      the even more disturbing trend of late is that

      1. nobody made any decisions
      2. nobody did any specific work
      3. nobody was available to do the work

      because an AI generated the entire content on the basis of an off-hand suggestion plugged in by a Search API directly reading some user’s query and shitting out a vapid, insipid extrapolation of that query in the rough shape of an article on-the-spot and brute force slamming SEO algorithms with keywords so it’s the first ten items you see when the search concludes.