• SeductiveTortoise
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 days ago

    Depends in what part you trust. I trust them with my ID, I wouldn’t trust a random website. They know it anyway as they made it.

    • @tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      If we’re talking about a hard copy ID (passport, drivers license) that’s one thing. A digital ID, and over the internet, is asking for trouble.

      • SeductiveTortoise
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 days ago

        That’s the reason I wrote what I wrote. everyone only knows what they need to know. How do you think a third entity would identify you?

        • @tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          I doubt the concept of anonymised data. Companies and governments have bad incentives to know who you are, and collect data from brokers to make correlations and educated guesses.

          • SeductiveTortoise
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 days ago

            You should avoid everything then. Besides that, what has that got to do with the issue?

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 days ago

          Easy:

          • companies have a vested interest in identifying you (ads, data brokers, etc)
          • governments have a vested interest in tracking you (local police, terrorism tracking, etc)

          I don’t trust the government and private interests to come to an agreement that somehow benefits citizens more than their combined interests.

          • SeductiveTortoise
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 days ago

            I’m not saying I’m for age verification. I’m just saying if it were for it, there’d be solutions.

            What I wrote I did while being barely awake in five minutes. Sure it needs work. But there’d be ways to do it without a camera up your butt.

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 days ago

              My point is that any solution here will be used for tracking, because that’s in the interests of both regulators and regulated entities. It’s not going to solve the original problem because kids are great at finding workarounds, and it will cause harm to those who follow the rules.

              I also could devise a technical solution here that respects users’ privacy and is effective, but once it’s implemented, it will be changed to violate privacy. That’s how these things work.

        • @pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          How do you think a third entity would identify you?

          You may want to join us reading along in the privacy communities of the fediverse.

          But long story shortened - third parties are very much identifying each of us in staggeringly novel and effective ways.

          For example, depending on circumstances, third parties may not be sure which room in my home I am sitting in, right now, while being aware that I’m writing this. This shit has gotten deeply weird and invasive.