• Ænima
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I’ll give up on YouTube before I give up my ad blocks or 3rd party apps. Fuck off Google.

      • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        If the price was even relatively sane I would be okay with that honestly.

        But no, they need to keep driving the price up and up. I have to pay my part so that little Jimmy can host 297 hours of white noise on his account that no one wants to watch.

        They simply need to change their tactics a little. It cost you some small sane amount to host your videos there. If your videos don’t g gather watches and make money you should be the one paying for them.

        I want to pay about nine bucks a month for a family account it’s just b-f rate content. You can pay less to get actual well rated movies from other services.

        Also give me the option not to throw in Google music I don’t give a s*** about Google music.

      • RandomException
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Weird to see this downvoted. Youtube is actually a good service that also isn’t cheap to run, and it also pays good(?) money to the people producing popular content on the platform so why not pay for using it? Or, you know, live with the ad infestation. Businesses need money to run, and if you don’t pay for the content, then either it’s the ads or eventually the whole platform needs to be shut down.

        It is a separate discussion if Premium pricing is appropriate etc. But it’s quite horrifying to see people around the world having been taught into thinking that everything should be “free” even though at the same time everyone is complaining about privacy violation and ads being everywhere all the time.

        • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But it’s quite horrifying to see people around the world having been taught into thinking that everything should be “free” even though at the same time everyone is complaining about privacy violation and ads being everywhere all the time.

          That is exactly the issue, but you are placing quite a bit too much of your disapproval on the audience.

          Google (and others) have built business models off of data mining because so many people didn’t give a shit for so long about it. They have monetized their users for the entire time they have owned the platform. They have trained their own users to feel like the product was free while using those people for advertising dollars.

          People have always hated ads, but you had generations of folks who were born before the internet who mostly just accepted the ads were going to be there, and also have never given a single thought to privacy. That slice of the pie is getting smaller, for various reasons.

          Now Google have decided since they can’t reliably exploit enough of their users, it’s time to start charging them directly. They are fighting against their own inertia. It is they who have trained users with “we aren’t asking you for $$, so don’t worry about how we’re paying for all this, trust me bro.”

          The modern audience is increasingly made up of people with both the will and capability to set up ad blocking and/or privacy protecting measures. Sorry Google, we aren’t going down quietly.

          • RandomException
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are absolutely right! Part of the horribleness is exactly companies like Google who were the ones teaching people that everything should be “free” as in usable without explicit money transaction, and now they are the ones who are (thanks to EU I guess) trying to revert that and make the business model viable through subscription.

            So I do get why the problem exists and I feel no empathy for the companies that are to blame for that. But, I do worry that we have a whole generation of people who think that stuff should just exist and have no monetary value like it just materialized out of thin air without anyone working on it before and neither having to keep it running. That is not a healthy mental model and it will contribute to predatory companies being able to harvest data out of these people in the future meanwhile privacy-first companies can’t get them as customers because they have to actually ask for money for their services.

            • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              But, I do worry that we have a whole generation of people who think that stuff should just exist and have no monetary value like it just materialized out of thin air without anyone working on it before and neither having to keep it running. That is not a healthy mental model and it will contribute to predatory companies being able to harvest data out of these people in the future

              I see where you are coming from there, and I don’t disagree with your opinion, but I do still think that while that may objectively be a mindset that is potentially harmful, I feel the net impact in this context is more likely to be increased contribution to and support of things that really are Free (gratis and libre), nudging reality closer to a place where a lot of those sorts of services are free or donation-supported, and less likely to be in corporate hands unless those corporations improve their behavior.

              A hard to summarize version of that sort of path and mindset is what initially pushed me away from Windows, but over more than a decade I’ve developed lots more reasons than cost for why I’d never go back, and for why I’ve become a Free Software enthusiast and advocate.

        • @verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Stuff should be free. We live in an age where every one of us could be living a life of comfort and reasonable luxury with a modicum of work. In the meantime those of us who aren’t being showered by the excesses of capitalism are fully entitled to stand in the splashes.

      • @inetknght@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        OTA TV: with ads

        OTA TV: if you record you are pirating

        Cable TV: you pay a fortune to have no ads!

        Cable TV: now with extra premium stuff!

        Cable TV: now with ads!

        Cable TV: if you record, you’ll be prosecuted

        Cable TV: pray we do not alter the deal further

        Cable TV: why is everyone moving away from Cable TV?

        Youtube: your own videos!

        Youtube: your own videos are actually ours

        Youtube: our videos with ads!

        Youtube: now pay a fortune to remove ads!

        Youtube: pray we do not alter the deal further

        Youtube: if you download or remove ads you’ll be banned

        This isn’t the pattern you’re looking for. Move along.

        • NoIWontPickAName
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Oh, we’ll see at that point I would just like stop paying for it. That’s how I deal with services that no longer meet my expectations.

            • NoIWontPickAName
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Kind of, people are not quitting YouTube, I’m off them are still using it, but bitching that their free video streaming service needs to get paid.

              They are still using it and costing YouTube money in aggregate

              • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                They are still using it and costing YouTube money in aggregate

                The poor company only making $31.5 Billion a year has to eat the streaming cost for someone using as ad blocker? Won’t somebody PLEASE think of the billionaires?!

                • NoIWontPickAName
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Oh no won’t someone please think of the people so entitled they believe they should get everything for free.

                  Like, I just don’t understand the thought process behind people like you.

                  Do you ask for free everything else?

                  • @nyctre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    It’s not about wanting everything for free, it’s about billionaires asking for more all the time. I can’t find any information about the costs of running YouTube, but it’s definitely making a profit. It’s making over 30 billion in ad revenue and 15 billion from subscriptions. And somehow that’s not enough and they need more.

                    I don’t understand why people feel the need to defend billionaires and their corporations out of all the things to spend your time on…

                  • krolden
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    how much are you paying for your kbin account?

      • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LOL what are you talking about? The users had a hissy fit but after that Reddit got everything they wanted. The users mostly all returned a few days later and it was business as usual. Since then they opened up about selling user data and IPO’d and still nothing.

        It’s become abundantly clear now that there’s level of abuse these users won’t endure.