• chiisana
    link
    fedilink
    298 months ago

    Having seen some spicy pillows in my times… I’d hate to be onboard if any of the battery containers becomes a bouncy castle.

    • @Ptsf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      78 months ago

      These batteries are likely far more complex in packaging, design, and thermal management that any consumer electronic cell. They’ll likely “fail safely” if/when they do fail.

        • @Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          Posting this while Boeing is killing whistleblowers for talking about how many corners they’re cutting is absolutely wild lmao

        • @davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Are you kidding me? iPhones and most smartphones and laptops are Chinese products. The vast majority of high speed rail in the world are Chinese products. The Tiangong space station is largely Chinese products.

        • @Ptsf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          China is a massive economy and country with some of the most advanced manufacturering and tooling in the entire world. Yes, it could be shoddy, but it’s in a ship and is going to be far more regoriously scrutinized by their regulatory bodies than a normal stationary battery would be. I understand the plausiblity of your comment, but it seems to be rooted in prejudice or extreme ignorance.

    • @Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      118 months ago

      I expect they are using LFP which doesn’t do that.

      Fortunately energy density is not a concern with boats.

    • @B0rax@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Using standard container sizes as battery modules is kind of genius. That way they can be swapped out when they get older and newer technology comes along, they could even be swapped between ships.