• Hominine
        link
        fedilink
        English
        177 months ago

        I’m just going to shove these words into your mouth because I cannot grasp the obvious.

        • @NineMileTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -177 months ago

          It was wrong for Nintendo to copy someone, but it’s not wrong for Pocketpair to copy someone. That’s what you are saying?

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            It’s not wrong for either to draw inspiration from the other. It’s the hypocrisy that’s wrong.

            • @NineMileTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -87 months ago

              You can either explain your position, or you can be a pretentious ass. Like I said before, I’m often wrong. I’m willing to hear your point, but you refuse to make it and act pompous.

          • atocci
            link
            fedilink
            English
            187 months ago

            More like “it’s not wrong to take inspiration from something else”.

            • @NineMileTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -137 months ago

              I don’t disagree with that, but the line that is drawn between inspiration and imitation is blurred and the courts will probably rule in favor of those with the most money, unfortunately.

              • @Womble@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Nope, because Nintendo arent suing over copyright (like how the pals look) they are suing over patents, so either gameplay mechanics or under the hood processes. They are complete bullshit and involve things like a patent filed in 2024 for riding a mount in a game.

                As others have pointed out patents in Japan expire after 20 years so it cant be anything that was in the original pokemon as that has already termed out.

                • @NineMileTower@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -67 months ago

                  What about the dynamic of capturing wild monsters from all different biomes in a ball? Isn’t that relatively close Pokemon? Game play is different, but the dynamics are similar.

                  • @Womble@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    77 months ago

                    Read my edit, anything patented for the original pokemon is past the point of expiry in Japan (where the suit is filed).

              • atocci
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I think Nintendo’s lawyers must have determined it’s inspiration in this case though. Like you said, they’re suing for patent infringement and not copyright, so they must think a legal challenge on their creature designs is a lost cause.

    • @stormesp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -97 months ago

      Cant know if you are for real, most of those designs are barely the same despite being based on the same creatures, against how palworld straight up copied designs with a few changes? Seriously, fuck Nintendo and their shitty and buggy Pokemon games, but the Dragon Quest vs Pokemon designs are not even close to what Pocket Pair, masters of copying games did here.