• @hitwright@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3524 days ago

    I’m surprised how many people treat GPL to ignore borders. The IP law still operates only by the rules your country decides.

    I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it’s own country the discussion should end there.

    • @polar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1624 days ago

      Nobody says to ignore the law… it is Linus comments that were bad. Instead of defending the people that was working for him all these years and he had trust on them, he decided to throw them under the bus because he is from Finland. Well, Finland prospered the most on its life under neutrality.

      • @hitwright@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        824 days ago

        Well I guess if he trusts them, he will welcome in open arms once the sanctions are lifted. Or if they get a non russian state domain to operate from.

        • @polar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1224 days ago

          With those incendiary comments he did on the people that worked for him for years… I doubt they will be back. If he did not trust them, he would have gotten rid of them years ago. He waited to the deadline to kick them out… good, so he trusted them till now… but then, he despise them from being Russian. I simply don’t get it… I don’t know… maybe Linus is just an ass or he was forced to say that… I think probably the first.

    • @vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Did they get paid?

      Edit: Very likely they were paid, and that’s where IP addresses end and sanctions begin.

      Every worker within an organization has to be paid, somehow.

      Somebody must bear the costs of the supposedly “free (gratis).” In the end, nothing is truly free cost. And, not a single person would work for free (no payment, compensation, or benefits, or in other words, gratis) full-time.

      It is an absurdity to think otherwise.

      Free and open-source software is handed out at zero-cost to make it possible to lower the barrier of entrance; to make it as widely available as possible. Knowledge should, indeed, be free (gratis).

      https://medium.com/@uriadonayherrera/economics-in-foss-is-paying-for-free-and-open-source-software-an-investment-or-an-expense-19f187db8d5a

        • @vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Where did you get volunteers from?

          It’s about people on the maintainers list, and those are paid.

          That it’s open software doesn’t mean people are working for free.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -424 days ago

            You made a declarative statement that nobody would work full time for free.

            So explain volunteers.

            • @vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              Where did I make that statement?

              Do you mean the article that I posted?

    • @aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1024 days ago

      I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it’s own country the discussion should end there.

      Ideally the internet would be extra-sovereign