• @ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1014 days ago

    Do you agree that the CCP was responsible for thousands of deaths during the Tiananmen Square massacre? Do you agree that China is committing genocide against the Uyghurs?

    If you agree, think you might agree, or don’t know what the fuck I’m talking about, you shouldn’t be on lemmy.ml

    • CaptainBasculin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Yes to both. I absolutely despise both country’s governments because of their actions. However mirroring the government’s actions to individuals living in a country does not seem fair. I fucking hate my country’s president, and would celebrate it if he died. Why should I get judged based on his actions?

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1514 days ago

        No one’s judging you based on his actions, they’re judging you based on your actions. That being to have your account on an instance that supports those actions.

      • @ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        513 days ago

        You’re not being judged. We are letting you know what your instance is really about. Stay if you want, but you don’t align with it.

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          713 days ago

          I think it should be rephrased. 95% of people on lemmy.ml are probably sane, but since all their moderators are insane, it makes it look like everyone there agrees with them

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      Eh the massacring happened on side streets, local Peking residents were trying to keep the army from moving into the square not really knowing that other Peking residents had already briefed the army on who the protesters actually were, and what they wanted, and how they behaved. Once the army was on the square and set an ultimatum it was cleared with no or few casualties, the reports are a bit fuzzy.

      That doesn’t excuse the CCP in one bit, of course, or rather it doesn’t excuse the hardline faction who couldn’t stomach that others in the party were actually talking to the protesters as that would set a precedent that you can just turn up on the square and get an audience with the party, or maybe more precisely could boost the influence of one party faction over the whole.

      The whole situation really can’t be divorced from Hu Yaobang and his role in the party: The protests were essentially a wake for him and his ideas. Which the hardliners thoroughly buried afterwards and the situation in China hasn’t improved to the point where Chinese would even be comfortable to criticise that decision – you’d get invited for tea, if you can catch on to the euphemism.

      If it had been up to the hardliners yes the army would’ve massacred the whole square, if that hadn’t been their intention they wouldn’t have mischaracterised the nature of the protest towards the army. Without ordinary Peking citizens stepping in, and getting butchered for it, that massacre would have happened.

      And yes the Uygur situation is a genocide that’s without question or asterisk.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 days ago

          See there’s the stuff that happened, there’s the version that tankies want to believe (complete denial), which is actually different from the official CCP stance (“necessary and proportionate police action to ensure stability”, with the implication “enough questions, comrade, nothing more to see”), which is different from western public… myth, I have to say. Back when the stuff went down western journalists didn’t know what was happening, there were confusing reports, there were reports of violence, and then there was the tank man – taken the day after (IIRC, but definitely later and no he didn’t get run over). The collective imagination somehow constructed an image of the Chinese army rolling over students. Which is… metaphorically true, but not literally. And then the CCP is using that western imagination to spin their own tale of how the evil west is slandering them.

          • @ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 days ago

            There have been plenty of years to get to the bottom of it, and I’m pretty sure the bottom of it has been found.

    • @DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1614 days ago

      The fuck? Who are you to say who should be on lemmy.ml? Just because I don’t agree with some of the people that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t be here.

      Get the fuck out of here with that segregation bullshit. I don’t want an instance that defederate from everything I don’t agree with.

      • @sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4314 days ago

        You missed the point. He’s saying if you hold those positions, then your account isn’t safe there. I just avoid the .ml servers in general because of their heavy handed and politically charged moderating. Admins and power mods ruined reddit, I’d recommend not committing the same mistakes here.

        .ml servers started the segregationist bullshit with their moderating. I’d also be interested in what your stance was on most every server defederating with exploding heads and burggit back last year.

        • @DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2014 days ago

          I don’t know anything about exploding heads and burggit but I assume they are right-leaning/alt-right. Like lemmygrad but the "opposite?) I am against defederation in general. I like to be exposed to different opinions and I am fully capable to use my brain to not become an extremist.

          That said, I don’t agree with either the extremist left or right.

      • JoYo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2314 days ago

        they’re projecting.

        they want to destroy anyone that doesn’t share their opinions on their instance and assume that’s what happens here.

      • @ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        413 days ago

        Either you do not know anything about your instance, or you disagree with my comments about China. Which one is it?

    • @Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -714 days ago

      Truthfully, if anyone can give an independent first hand report about the treatment of Uyghurs in China (that is not coming from propaganda vehicles like the Victims of Communism Foundation), I would be most interested.

      No, I am not saying this in rebuttal to anything.

        • @Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          213 days ago

          Yes. Though serious human rights violations are not the same as genocide and concentrations camps, as both the above poster and Victims of Communism Foundation wants us to believe.

          That means in no way that those violations are acceptable.

          • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            313 days ago

            “allegations of patterns of torture, or ill-treatment, including forced medical treatment and adverse conditions of detention, are credible, as are allegations of individual incidents of sexual and gender-based violence.”

            And this is from what China let them see.

            • @Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Individual incidents of sexual and gender-based violence are horrible, but not nearly the same as sexual violence employed on scale through genocidal concentration camps, which is claimed by US propaganda machines. Individual incidents of sexual violence unfortunately happen everywhere, and pretending otherwise is wilful ignorance of an endemic problem for the purpose of, what I have to assume is, an underlying agenda. Stop moving the goal post and stop using reductive argumentation to score cheap shots at China. If China really is as bad as claimed, which I am not categorically refuting, then make the proper case for it.

              • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                413 days ago

                Any case you’ll say it’s not first hand and therefore invalid.

                You also seem to have narrow attention span. Seems the bit about torture, forced medical treatments, detention… Somehow eluded you. You saw the word “individual” and held to that like a Chinese state doctor holds a healthy kidney.

                But that happens everywhere, am I right?

                Yet here you are, taking about some hypothetical “US propaganda machine”, without making s proper case for it.

                This brand of deflection, “well, I’m not denying, but we can’t say for certain, and actually everywhere there are issues” isn’t new nor very effective. You might need to update your training data, give it a few more cycles. At least don’t throw it back to back in the conversion, jus much more noticeable that way.

          • xor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            413 days ago

            And, likewise, the UN stating that serious human rights violations occurred is not the same as them all saying they aren’t committing genocide