• @ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    More short sighted corporate greed. It’s a great period to try and pull in Twitter users but instead let’s add ads for a short term bump in profits.

    • @SuperSleuth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      They’d have to implement ads eventually anyway. Companies do have budgets, and the money to run Threads has to come from somewhere.

      • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Companies can and do make a loss to gain market share, they ae currently doing it with the metaverse and AI.

        As twitter struggles under the spastic, they should be incentivising the move for users.

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Why is it shortsighted? A service like this costs money to run, and if you won’t pay for it, someone else has to.

      • @eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Maybe lets not try to pretend that it is just about the costs shall we? I bet MBAs will cower at the suggestion to put up a paywall from the beginning. Afterall, bait-and-switch is their bread-and-butter.

        Subscriptions weren’t the norm when we actually paid for something and got the full product. The cost to run things didn’t suddenly become a factor just now.

        Only thing that changed: greed of businesses, execs, shareholders.

        • AwesomeLowlander
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          we actually paid for something and got the full product

          That’s generally not online platforms, though. For obvious reasons, those have ongoing operating costs