• @desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -37 days ago

    the main problem I have with the government doing this is that they would be the ones to define who the minoritys are. If I remember correctly the US consider veterans to be a protected class, what if a government decided to extend minority status to those that themselves (as part of their “culture”) codified intolerance to existing protected minorities (such as certain religions with respect to homosexuality)?

    • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 days ago

      I mean I’m not advocating for that though. I don’t think it’s impossible to restrict specifically fascist rhetoric. I don’t think it’s impossible to make it illegal to advocate for genocide of racial and gender minorities.

      • @desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -27 days ago

        if the (US and many others) governments weren’t run by fascists I might agree, but I know that politics change and facist, homophobic, racists are always going to have a chance to be elected in a democratic (republic) system.

        • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 days ago

          If this is already true then how does making it illegal to be a Nazi change that? If Nazis will already get into power (and then restrict non-nazi or anti-nazi speech), then what exactly is the risk of making it illegal to espouse Nazi ideology?