• AnimalsDream
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    I’m not too informed about DeepSeek. Is it real open-source, or fake open-source?

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        That sounds like fake open-source. Can I download the source, build it, have the thing run locally on my own machine, and use it without it having to interact with this company’s servers?

        • @ifmu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You can’t built it yourself but you can download the model and run it locally on your machine without it interacting to any server.

          There is a community-driven project aimed at making a fully reproducible version called Open-R1. You can find it at https://github.com/huggingface/open-r1.

    • @DasKapitalist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Deepseek is the company, R1 is an MIT-licensed produce, they have the Qwen models under Apache license.

      You can download, modify, run locally. There are many copies online out of Deepseek’s control.

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        I just looked it up.

        "The AI research company DeepSeek recently released its large language model (LLM) under the MIT License, providing model weights, inference code, and technical documentation. However, the company did not release its training code, sparking a heated debate about whether DeepSeek can truly be considered “open-source.”

        This controversy stems from differing interpretations of what constitutes open-source in the context of large language models. While some argue that without training code, a model cannot be considered fully open-source, others highlight that DeepSeek’s approach aligns with industry norms followed by leading AI companies like Meta, Google, and Alibaba."

        So fake open-source.