• @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    No. I’m advocating for us to try for the best possible version of our future. It may be inevitable, but I’m not interested in hoping for a world where we consider the loss of a hundred million people under the final spasming throes of a dying capitalist oligarchy to be an acceptable loss. Yes, it would be ultimately the oligarchs’ fault, but I still couldn’t live with myself if I were the one advocating for it.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      47 days ago

      Nobody is advocating for that, though. Revolution is very rarely that bloody, you need to look at historical example.

      • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        I was hoping that my ad absurdum example was clear. I just meant “a very large number.”

        Either way, I certainly hope nobody is seriously advocating for that. It would be quite bleak if that were the only way change could ever occur.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          16 days ago

          Revolutionaries can’t just “do a revolution,” we prepare for it so we can succeed when it happens. This is how revolution has occured historically, and there isn’t really a way to avoid it with any reasonable chance of success.