• Square Singer
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    I totally disagree with Stallman’s views and personally I do find them pretty worrying.

    But I also disagree with the concept that employers should be the executive of the court of public opinion.

    We have real courts and real police, we don’t need to invent a secondary one where people lose their jobs due to shitstorms.

    If you think he did something illegal, report him to the police or sue him. If not, then this is freedom of speech. Even though he uses the freedom to voice a pretty crappy opinion.

    I mean, if everyone who said something that lots of people disagree with, I guess we would all be unemployed now.

    • @ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      If you think he did something illegal, report him to the police or sue him. If not, then this is freedom of speech.

      …and? People also have freedom of association, and people can choose not to associate with an organization that employs someone with morally awful beliefs - especially when they make those beliefs very public.

      • Square Singer
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apparently, Stallman is a net positive for them, so they keep him.

        Doesn’t mean that they in any way endorse pedophilia.

        And the freedom of association also doesn’t mean that a bunch of enraged people online have the freedom to decide whom they associate with.

        And apparently, in the USA there is a whole party devoted to child marriage and other ways to have sex with minors. That might be the better point to start, because they actually have a say regarding laws on that matter.

        • alyaza [they/she]M
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          And apparently, in the USA there is a whole party devoted to child marriage and other ways to have sex with minors. That might be the better point to start, because they actually have a say regarding laws on that matter.

          i’m not sure why we’re acting as if condemning Richard Stallman and the Republican Party for their equally bad takes in this sphere are mutually exclusive of each other.

    • flatbield
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      There is this tendency to put people into either the good or bad box and that is something we all need to work on.

      In light of his position with the FSF, it is unwise for him to say controversial things unrelated to this role simply because people are just waiting to make hay.

      However calling someone bad or evil just because you disagree with them is really nuts. Ironic this forum is suppose to be accepting of differences and Stalmann is certainly different.

    • Freedom of speech is freedom of suppression from the government not freedom of social consequences.

      Fuck him and not hiring assholes is praxis. A shitty person isnt isolated from being shitty when they are doing the one thing they are good at.

      You can find non shitty people who are good at the same thing and keep the community clean from shitbags.

      Our communities dont need terrible people even if they do good work.

    • @MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      I disagree. Things you say have consequences. The things you say actively reflect on your employer and future employers. You can try to deny it all you want but that’s the fact. I for one look poorly on the FSF for reinstating Stallman and I don’t think the FSF is a body of decision-makers that are capable of making the right choice. That’s kind of a major part of the FSF.

      • @vsis@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The things you say actively reflect on your employer and future employers.

        why?

        Imagine a interview where employer tries to know every aspect of your personality and ideas, before hiring you.

        Seems quite impossible.

        For a celebrity like Stallman seems easy. But imagine checking the background of a random candidate just to see if she posted something bad years ago. And rejecting her application because of a post defendig the wrong ideas.

        I agree we already have courts and police. If he did something illegal, there’s a course of action there.

          • Square Singer
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure that most people are mature enough to differentiate between an organization that makes software and nothing at all to do with kids and/or sexuality and that old wierdo’s personal views.

            We live in a world where huge corporations with a revenue higher than the GDP of many countries routinely exploit child labour and work their workers to death or suicide, burning whole countries and pushing climate change while at it. And yet we collectively shrug and still buy Nestle, Apple, Samsung or H&M.

            A shitstorm towards such a niche and unknown organisation as the FSF really doesn’t matter. We all know the Stallman and the FSF, because we are into computers, software and/or open source. But ask any random person on the street, thew wouldn’t know who Stallman or the FSF is if you told them that it’s not Android but actually Chrome/Android SDK/Dalvik/Toybox/Linux that runs on their phone.

              • Square Singer
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Your actions do nothing. You complain on the internet about some guy that said something you don’t like. Nobody from FSF is gonna read it. And neither will Stallman or anyone that matters.

                I don’t see you boycotting software related to FSF. And even if you do, it doesn’t even matter, since the overwhelming majority of FOSS users never donate any money at all.

                You are no customer of the FSF, you just enjoy their stuff for free.

                So your actions amount to angry screaming into a box.