Microsoft, doing it’s part to make the world a better place.

  • @olympicyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    My father in law has Windows 7 machines that he uses for scientific work that he refuses to update. His solution is to prevent them from connecting to the internet. Unfortunately not willing to try modern Linux.

  • peopleproblems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So does anyone have a good strategy for transferring non giant things? Like I have a ton of unorganized pictures, documents, videos dating back to my 2009 1TB HDD that still works.

    I think I want to run Debian mostly because I don’t know any other build well. Well RHEL, but I want to keep it similar to the Steam Deck as I can

    • DarkThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      If you want to play games, then Debian isn’t that good of a choice because of the outdated packages. I’d suggest getting a new SSD though. Your HDD is already pretty old and slow and could potentially fail soon, so you might as well get some fresh storage. Makes it easy to test distros too until you found something satisfactory, at which point you can transfer over your old data and eventually format your old HDD into some sort of backup drive I guess.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You can play games on Debian if you install Steam from Flatpak. It installs everything it needs (drivers, Proton etc.) and just works.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You don’t need the latest kernel for games to work, a recent one will do.

            Debian uses LTS kernel versions, which have very good support. Debian 12 runs kernel 6.1 which will be supported until the end of 2027.

            • DarkThoughts
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              If you’re using AMD you do, because that’s the majority of your gpu driver.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Linux Mint is a pretty solid option for a desktop OS. And it feels quite a bit like Debian.

    • @stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      1TB is easy, a sata to usb 3.0 adapter is like $10 and will transfer all that data in a few hours. If you are more patient just setup the drive as shared in windows and transfer it over the network. I just copied about 7TB a few weeks ago to a new NAS over the network and I had it done over the weekend.

    • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Dump it into a NAS. Synology makes a decent 2-drive NAS that is easy to maintain. They have a decently long lifecycle and even upgrading hardware is usually just moving the drives to the new unit and powering it on.

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Keep it on the old 1TB hdd and buy a sata to usb cable or usb conversion kit?

  • Lowlee Kun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Windows 11 can suck my stinky cock. Windows will successfully force my LAZY ass to Linux. I am already testing the waters with my laptop.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    I installed linux. I only use browser and vlc and it works great. I am not buying a new machine when old one works just fine.

  • ryhn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Reject Windows, emabrace Linux and FOSS Software

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well you see, they learned their lesson from Windows 7 and having to support it for years longer than they intended to.

    They know the same thing will happen for 10, because they are literally forcing a bunch of hardware out, even though all of it can technically run Windows 11 and just don’t have a TPM 2.0 chip. They made this choice, this was a business decision and they know it’s coming.

    So what did they learn? To not give it away for free. Now they’re rolling out a program to charge consumers for access to extended updates for Windows 10.[1]

    Back in the Windows 7 days, they only did that for corporations, extended updates with a cost attached. Now you, the consumer, get the joy of paying for these updates as well.

    Not only are they purposefully creating trash, they’re also squeezing people for money in the process.

    They’re doing exactly what they did with Windows 7, this time they just plan to charge you for the convenience.

    Stay classy, Microsoft.


    1. Individuals or organizations who elect to continue using Windows 10 after support ends on October 14, 2025, will have the option of enrolling their PCs into a paid ESU subscription.” ↩︎

    • Capt. Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why, but your post made me question if TPM 2.0 expansions outside the processor are a thing. Turns out they are as long as your board supports them. I was just able to get one for mine for $25.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep, before I upgraded recently, my motherboard had a port for TPM, but it was only able to support TPM 1.0, so it was still SOL.

        Old box is now running Linux and a handful of network services.

        • Capt. Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I still have a 4th Gen devil’s canyon in my main pc. It still outperforms most current gen chips apparently, so I plan on running it til it burns the house down.

    • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I honestly don’t have an issue paying for updates of EOL software. But I also grew up in a time when that was normal. I remember paying for iOS 3.

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It says it’ll be free for Window 365 users. Ie. 70 bucks and that includes office.

      Obviously it’s not great, but it’s better than adobe.

      Windows 95 cost two hundred 30 years ago.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Consumers can also pay for extended Windows 7 updates, of course. I also don’t see why just that (consumers can also pay) part is bad and much worse than a stupid requirement to force users to pay.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You forgot the “best” part, which is that requiring TPM 2.0 is purely self-serving for Microsoft in that it serves no purpose but to make it more difficult to run non-Windows OSs on the hardware in the future.

      Nobody needs a TPM except for the copyright cartel trying to destroy computer owners’ property rights.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh I mean, I thought that was implied, but yeah, go off about it, it fucking sucks!

        EDIT: In response to your edit. ACKSHUALLY the TPM requirement is a big deal for corporations, because it does help increase corporate security. The thing is, the average user doesn’t actually need that extra security so much and will likely never use it so making it a requirement for the consumer-level Windows is abject bullshit.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I upgraded my CPU in preparation for 11 but have since installed Linux instead. It seems like you’re saying simply having a TPM makes it harder to use other OSs?