Damn, this is a sad day for the homelab.

The article says Intel is working with partners to “continue NUC innovation and growth”, so we will see what that manifests as.

  • Nukemin Herttua
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Damn, we are using them at my work and they have been very good as remotely updateable media kiosks. I just started to learn how to use them. Ofcourse well keep using them for some time still, but at some point we’ll need to find another solution.

    I was also thinking getting one to work as a streaming computer. Currently I use one computer setup, which causes performance issues with some games. Would a nuc work as a computer to encode the video live or would it make more sense to use a machine with s proper GPU? Any thoughts?

  • Mubelotix
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    Intel would better focus on the things they master instead of building shitty gpus

          • @FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And NUCs are usually 4x4. That’s literally half the footprint.

            Edit: a quarter of the size. This is why I don’t do math before coffee.

            • nintendiator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Don’t you mean a quarter of the footprint? It’s half the size per side.

            • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Unless space is the absolute unchangeable primary concern than the size difference doesn’t matter.

            • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Okay, sure, but we’re talking about inches. 8x8 isn’t a large footprint. Don’t be obtuse. Also 4x4 is 1/4 the footprint of 8x8.

  • @Madnessx9@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    I got an i7-6700 skull canyon? for free through work many years ago, absolutely love it, it now serves as a Linux box and hosts server stuff on it. Only issue is a ram port died and seemed a common problem!?

    Still enjoying using it and it’s form factor is fantastic, not sure if I would replace my own desktop with it but would have been an easy consideration for the kids first PC although it may benefit them actually building a tower and learning.

    Shame to hear they are stopping

    • @ridel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Go used. Lots of people get rid of their hardware when just a bit of care and repairs will make it as useful as brand new.

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Every time I’ve had a use for these either a business PC (or ex-business referb for home) has always been a better, cheaper answer.

      • ЛRMAN0989
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        My city has a couple mom-and-pop type businesses doing it, I’d hazard a guess it’s similar elsewhere - never heard of any ‘big name’ outfits doing it on any real scale.

      • @Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        If you’re in a major city theres likely a recycling centre just for old office machines. You can snag them dirt cheap, but with no Harddrive. Theyre a bit dated, but will work great as a server.

        • @AssPennies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          In a similar vein is to look for government auctions in town. I’ve got a major public university in my city, and it maintains a permanent auction warehouse. Like once a month they sell all kinds of stuff, from mini fridges to laptops by the pallet.

        • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          You could use eBay but that’s usually the option of last resort.

          Your local city probably has referb shops that sell them or if you’re keen you can pick them up directly from auction for peanuts.

    • @dudebro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I mean, they’re just doing whatever they believe will make them the most amount of money for the least amount of effort.

      All publicly-traded corporations do the same. Intel has just been very good at it because they used to have a product that was better than the competition.

    • Fish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That sucks, I hope this isn’t a statement about the “Mini-Pc” market in general. I’ve been thinking about getting one as a “Steam machine/ emulation station” for a long time but the stars never really lined up.

      I’ve got a full sized PC in the front room getting long in the tooth and looking ridiculous that could easily be replaced. But while the 970 still plays Dave the Diver, well there’s other shit money can be spent on.

      Wasn’t meant as a reply, pressed the wrong thing, my bad

      • @whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Right there with you. Full size ATX machine circa 2010ish, can still play GTA V fine enough. The only reason it isn’t my media server is because my Mac mini does that for less power.

        The big guy keeps chugging along when I need him, so the funds go elsewhere.

  • @Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1301 year ago

    Jesus Christ. Why does it feel like tech industry is just getting shittier and more expensive, while all the cool consumer options are being axed. Intel Nucs were a relatively cheap way to get a cute little desktop machine or a home server. I am sad that they’re going away. I guess there’s always Minisforum, but still…

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Better cooing which means it would last longer.

          No display, battery, camera, etc should be cheaper.

        • @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Or why get a nuc when you can get a decommissioned Enterprise sff PC like a thinkcentre tiny for a quarter of the price

          • Behohippy
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            These are amazing. Dell, Lenovo and I think HP made these tiny things and they were so much easier to get than Pi’s during the shortage. Plus they’re incredibly fast in comparison.

      • @orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        321 year ago

        Capitalism is unsustainable. We’re seeing what happens in late capitalism. The belts tighten, the workers get left in the dust, the products consumers actually want get the axe.

            • @Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -331 year ago

              Where do you have capitalism in US? US is probably one of the most anti capitalist countries in the world right now.

              • @orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                link
                fedilink
                121 year ago

                That’s not really true though and it’s anecdotal. The anti-capitalist mindset might be growing due to awareness and people suffering at the hands of capitalism (continued layoffs, increased cost of groceries and rent, union busting, worker exploitation), but that’s because of the ever-tightening squeeze of late capitalism. When you have a structure that requires infinite growth to exist, in a world with finite resources, you end up with the current state of the US.

                I think it would be more accurate to say that the anti-capitalist mindset among the working class has definitely grown in the US, but at its core, the US is pro-capitalist.

                • @Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -51 year ago

                  Where’s US pro capitalist? It’s one of a few countries with legal corruption called lobbying, which helps big corps to shield themselves from competition. US today has a plethora of laws and regulations which create and sustain monopolies. US has whole industries created by lawmakers and completely stonewalled from anyone entering them. Capitalism my ass…

                  Also capitalism doesn’t require infinite growth. I don’t know where you people are getting that lunacy from.

              • @marmo7ade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                191 year ago

                The entire USA financial system works on the basis of capital. What the fuck are you talking about? I cannot wait to read your conspiracy theory.

            • @Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -61 year ago

              You can read about capitalism in Wikipedia.

              Most countries today move towards economical fascism, where governments exercise control over private property but do not nationalize it. Lobbying, donor interest protection, cronyism, rise of oligarchy - you can see it in many countries. And then inevitable radicalisation of the public and scapegoating everything else as the core issue. Capitalism, migrants, ecology - everything is a problem but the government.

              • @shortgiraffe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Contemporary capitalist societies developed in the West from 1950 to the present and this type of system continues to expand throughout different regions of the world—relevant examples started in the United States after the 1950s

                This Wikipedia article says that the US is a capitalist system.

                Lobbying, donor interest protection, cronyism, rise of oligarchy

                Where are these things listed in the article as being incompatible with capitalism, and their presence meaning it’s some other system?

          • @ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Bruh, I don’t believe in late stage capitalism either but we are definitely living in capitalist economies in most of the world.

            Capitalism isn’t just laissez-faire, completely free market type stuff. It’s a spectrum.

        • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who is Oliver Waters and why should I listen to them regarding economic theory? I read the post, and it reads more like a philosophical thought experiment than any applicable economics theory.

          While I don’t believe someone needs a higher education degree to speak on complex topics, I’m not going to take a Medium blog post from someone who lists no demonstrable experience in theoretical or practical economics as a central source for discussions, sorry.

          • snarf
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            It’s not philosophical at all; it’s rather straightforward in its arguments, IMO. Not sure why nobody wants to discuss the points directly, and they are cogent points regardless of whose keyboard they originated. If the points made are incorrect, they should be relatively easy to refute.

          • snarf
            link
            fedilink
            -8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This sounds true on its face, but if you had read my source, you would see how that argument is refuted. The problem is that you are assuming the resources of the system must be used up for growth, but that is not true.

            • ThrowawayOnLemmy
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              If the last 300 years are anything to go by, we clearly do need resources if we are to maintain growth at a rate high enough to barely keep pace with the needs of the market. Coal, steal, oil, cement, water, food, etc.

              The reality is, we can’t replace the current demand on renewable energy sources alone. You seem to believe the system can pivot and adapt fast enough to fix itself. While I’m of the mindset the system will follow the path of least resistance even if that means killing itself.

              • snarf
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                We need resources, yes, of course! However, consuming those resources is not the only way to generate growth. My linked post lays it out fairly clearly, I think.

                Whether or not I think we, currently, can pivot quickly enough to a model that doesn’t kill us all, I don’t know. I think it’s possible, but like you, I’m also pessimistic about it happening. In any case, that is not at all what I was suggesting. My only point was that infinite economic growth is feasible in general.

                • ThrowawayOnLemmy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Do you have the text of that article you linked? I’ll confess I hit a login wall nearly immediately into the discussion and I never log in to any of that stuff. But I am curious to read more.

              • @AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                People used to say this about energy as well, yet in the past 5-10 years, I’ve read several articles demonstrating that we appear to have decoupled energy growth from economic growth

        • key
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          That article is utterly unconvincing. It just handwaves the finite nature of our material reality with a very weak appeal to “infinite” human creativity. And then the conclusion is that infinite growth is necessary because there’s no way to change the status quo of wealth hoarding. It’s just apologism for the very worst aspects of capitalism without a single iota of serious thought.

          • snarf
            link
            fedilink
            -131 year ago

            I don’t think there is any hand waving. Consuming a resource is not the only factor that goes into economic growth. Can you address that point specifically?

            • key
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              No I won’t because it’s irrelevant if it is the only factor or not. It’s the limiting factor. Please don’t engage in red herrings.

        • roofuskit
          link
          fedilink
          31
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Only two kinds of people believe in infinite growth; economists and psychopaths.

          • TooTallSol
            link
            fedilink
            211 year ago

            Only two kinds of people believe in infinite growth; economists and psychopaths.

            But you repeat yourself :)

            • Shurimal
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              Capitalists are behind the most prelavent economic school (neoliberalism) today—just look at the history of the “Chicago school”. I doubt the capitalists themselves believe that BS, but it’s profitable for them to make the rest of the world to believe it.

              I highly recommend evonomics.com, some rally good essays on there about the cult-like economic beliefs of today. Written by economists who’ve seen through the BS.

          • snarf
            link
            fedilink
            -131 year ago

            So we’re going with an ad hominem attack instead of engaging in good faith?

            • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              111 year ago

              Pretending like capitalism is this new concept that needs to be fully explored and debated before we understand that it’s bad is a pretty bad faith framing of the issue. Infinite economic growth is literally impossible because Earth has finite resources and there is a finite number of humans. There is no necessity or imperative behind infinite economic growth other than to make the ruling class richer at everyone else’s expense.

              • snarf
                link
                fedilink
                -61 year ago

                This has nothing to do with capitalism. And my source explains how infinite growth is possible. Consuming the resources of a finite system is not the only factor that goes into economic growth.

              • @ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I would say just generalizing capitalism as ‘bad’ is also not in good faith. It is not without issues, and letting it be completely unrestrained would probably be disastrous. But no other economic system has lifted more people out of abject poverty or driven technological innovation as hard. There are benefits.

                • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There’s the old “more people were in poverty before capitalism” argument.

                  Did capitalism bring people out of poverty? Or did access to education, healthcare, social safety nets, and proper food bring people out of poverty? Where I live, capitalism is what’s driving people into tent cities.

                  How does one person controlling the capital in an area, help other people if they’re gatekeeping the economic prosperity from by forcing them to perform labour, at a disproportionately low rate of recompense, to help them (the capital owner) increase their net worth? Don’t even say trickle down economics or I’ll deck you.

              • snarf
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Ah, I hadn’t heard that one before. Sorry if I got too defensive.

      • billwashere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        731 year ago

        Yeah this part bothers me. To these companies a solid profit stream is not viable. It has to be iPhone level growth year after year or they think it’s failing and axe it. It’s quite annoying. Eventually you will hit a plateau. That just means it’s a mature market, not failing. Grrrr…

        • @Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          601 year ago

          You see the same shit on streaming services. “Oh this show has been out for two days and hasn’t reached Game of Thrones level of popularity already? Let’s remove it from existence forever.”

    • @EDRBd97kWbT2KzK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Intel NUCs were very good machines but honestly they were completely overpriced compared to Chuwi/Minisforum/etc.

      My guess is they were just not enough sales, that’s all.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        According to The Register’s piece, Intel sales were around 10 million NUCs in 10 years. I guess they don’t count other companies’ sales for that, despite using intel CPUs?

      • @radiated@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        What’s the Chuwi Equivalent to a Nuc? Not being snarky, im genuinely looking for a small server.

        • @Reamen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yeah, mini-computers are one thing, but the NUCs were more than that. Having a PCI-E card that you can slot into your computer to literally run a PC inside your PC is super unique and not something anyone else offers.

          Sad to see them drop this. I can understand that it’s not an in-demand market segment, but it was cool none-the-less

          • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Having a PCI-E card that you can slot into your computer to literally run a PC inside your PC is super unique and not something anyone else offers

            My hope has been from the start that that product line would lead to some compute module-style clustering motherboards for really clean & compact x86 clusters. It would especially make sense for dedicated server/VPS providers which already rely on similar dense blade systems from Supermicro.

            Imagine a box that would take 3 of them, give each a PCIe slot and an NVMe slot, and an then give you 3 power buttons, 3 sets of IO and maybe an integrated network switch so you only need 1 Ethernet cable to connect the swarm to your network. That would be useful not just for clustering in homelabs and SOHO but also for offices and such if they want to reduce the physical footprint of their PCs while maintaining pretty good serviceability for “go swap this PC out” scenerios

      • @regeya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Oh lort. You just gave me flashbacks. One of my kids bought one of those $200 Chuwi laptops and it would barf all over itself about once a month, so badly it would require a reinstall.

    • @dartos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      There’s a chip shortage. Most people just use web based apps, so stay on their phones / cheap laptops Enthusiasts usually just build their own machines. Everything is more expensive. The list goes on

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Chip shortage. Since COVID, chip companies have been having a really hard time getting properly restocked. This impacts all electronics industries. Cars, computers, even Apple had to redesign some of their products to accommodate the shortages, so has many other companies big and small. The Raspberry Pi prices have soared. So products that take a chip away from a more mainstream or lucrative market are being axed.

      • @mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There was a great resale market for them. I got an i7 8th gen for about $200-300 new when the 10th gen came out. It was clearly never used overstock that a reseller picked up cheap. Its a champ of a machine, still going strong.

        They also made cheap celeron models that sold in the $100-200 range that were 5x as powerful as the raspi that would normally fill the niche.

        • @Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Yeah the celeron and pentium models are amazing low power machines to run Home Assistant on. Mine is running half a dozen other docker addons including frigate to do ai object detection (offloading most of the heavy lifting to a Google coral chip plugged into usb)

          Being the default industry standard meant drivers were never a hassle

      • Overzeetop
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        IKR? For what they wanted I could get a faster full size machine with better expandability. I get the value in a small box, but unless you had some commercial application or wanted some special architectural aesthetic in your home that required that size, it was a waste of money.

  • @jalim@jalim.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    The article makes it sound they cost over $1,000 (USD?) and were impossible to find but here in Australia I never had any issues finding and unless you were going for the extreme versions, there closer to $5-600AUD which made them a great fit. All we can hope is that there’s a few other brands who are willing to fill the space with equal quality products.

      • @FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        equal quality products

        Except they don’t fill this niche. Sure, Beelinks and minisforum are neat and cheap, but they tend to have QC problems and don’t stack up well against Intel NUCs.

      • PositiveNoise
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I replaced my old, fairly high end pc with a fairly high end Beelink a few months ago, and it’s working out fine. The beelink mini is cheaper, better and faster in every way, and will end up as about 5% of the trash my old PC exists as. I’m not sure I’m going back to full-sized desktop pcs, despite being a game artist/game developer who needs somewhat high specs to do my work.

      • @jalim@jalim.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That was for new entry level specs, you could obviously spend a lot more on the highest specs but often the NUC fit a segment that didn’t need to be bleeding edge of performance.

  • @FreeLikeGNU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    AMD seems to be eating their lunch in small computers for consumers with their APUs in the Steamdeck and the more than a half dozen like handhelds, mini-pcs, etc. I’m sure intel will hang onto small embedded devices for industrial applications for some time but it’s puzzling that they would just drop RISCV which seems poised to proliferate in this sector as well. It could just be that intel seeing that manufacture in China is and will continue to be very tricky has to narrow focus while they move their manufacture closer to home.

  • @jaackf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I was just looking at buying one second hand yesterday… Better buy one before everyone ramps up their prices!

  • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    What’s the opinion about System76’s mini PCs? I’ve just ran across them and thinking of getting one.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I bought one several years ago (at least 6 years) and I.find it still works great. Though i’m not very demanding in how I use it

    • BaroqueInMind
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I don’t own one, but want to as well. Commenting here to return and see what anyone replies to you.

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Commenting here to return and see what anyone replies to you.

        Not sure about Kbin, but Lemmy has a bookmarks feature for this.