…replacing the previously hydraulic version.

Insert obligatory welcome statement here.

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      It’s such a weird phrasing. They make it sound like you can give it nails and a hammer and it can frame a house better than a human.

    • k_rol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It gives the deathgrip a whole new meaning

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I mean like we don’t pull carriages with even our top athletes but we will with a runt of the litter horse.

            • Aniki 🌱🌿
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              No you absolutely do not! You never put more than half the weight of the horse on it’s back. I just recently went riding and since I’m not a fucking lardass I got to ride a good horse.

              Movies and TV are not real life.

              • HubertManne
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                carriages can be of all types of sizes you know but if a humans pulling it we call it a rickshaw and we would never attach a horse to it because it could not handle its power.

      • @maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        When I was taking classes on similar things, ‘human performance’ was generally defined as how well an expert in a given task performed.

  • @RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -221 year ago

    I mean, the planet’s dying, but ok. At least we’ve got robots that “excced human performance” in making their overlords profits. Imagine if these scientists were putting their efforts to real use.

    • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was already thinking this reminded me of The Talos Principle but your “the planet is dying” comment makes it even more close of a match. Those games are awesome.

        • @Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Yes. The planet doesn’t give a single fuck. It went through many extinction level events and it’s still here.

      • @clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        humanity is dying. But that’s ok.

        Along with thousands of other species. That’s not ok.

          • @Disaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            The sun will start increasing in luminosity within a billion years, at which point it will be intense enough to cause rocks to begin soaking up CO2 to a point where photosynthesis will become difficult, and the planetary food chain will collapse.

            The hour is much later than we think. Maybe another supercontinent cycle or so?

          • @phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            The real worst-case that you don’t hear in media is turning Earth into a situation similar to Venus. At that point there’s a real small chance of even extremophiles much less anything complex. Of course the planet will still rotate and continue orbiting the sun but earth-based life would probably only exist in some of our space junk like the poop bags Apollo left on the moon.

            • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Because that level of environmental collapse is many lifetimes away, if it’s coming at all.

              One of the benefits of humans dying out, which everyone seems so sure about, is that as humanity dwindles, so too will the continued damage to the ecosystem.

              May not stop it, but would certainly hamper the acceleration of things.

              • HubertManne
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Yeah though we are really good at surviving as long as there is anything at all to survive on.

              • @phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Unfortunately, not super relevant. The earth->Venus scenario is about a positive feedback loop. So stopping our emissions after that tipping point doesn’t help.

      • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lol, not really. I’m rolling my eyes. It’s just more doom and gloom reaction to a legitimately useful piece of technology, which could be just as much benefit to humanity as a detriment.

        Plus the idea that the people who worked on this might have even been capable of working on something more “useful” to humanity is complete and utter moon shot speculation, along with the idea that this is mutually exclusive to research and development of “useful” things.

        I’ll reserve my cynicism for when these actually start trending towards replacing human workforce, like how LLMs are being misused. Most of Boston Dynamics’s stuff doesn’t have massive effects on the world, it’s more specialized use cases.

      • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Is it going to be used to do dangerous labor, or just expensive labor? I have a feeling the places like the cobalt mines in Africa will be among the last to get robot workers while McDonalds in countries with first world wages will probably be among the first.

        • @ramirezmike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          the scientists build the robots. Society and its corruption will determine how they get used. I don’t think it’s a reason to not build robots or to say they’re not worth making. At some point in the future, society may collectively improve and the robots will be there to use.

          • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Not all technology is inherently neutral, and scientists know this. Scientists also typically know whos funding them. You think anyone at BD was surprised to see their work on a robot dog end up by the sides of police to be deployed at protests?

          • @Disaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            The hour’s growing late there. We needed to solve that problem before this technology became available. Just need useful life-extension technology and then it’ll just be a bunch of rich psychopaths running around the planet, and everyone else will be disposed of.

      • @VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        It’s probably one of the biggest potential saviors tbh, having robots efficiently construct wind turbines and solar arrays in inhospitable locations will help us transition from oil far faster and more efficiently.

        I know a lot of people want to go back to having half the world impoverished so we can exploit their cheap labour like in the good old days but technology already helped them access education and stuff so that game is over.

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          These bots aren’t designed for that. They’re designed to replace humans in human-form-factor job infrastructure. Think less “installing wind turbines” and more “replacing all the human pickers in an Amazon warehouse.”

          • @VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            You don’t think humans install wind turbines or build solar farms? How do you imagine they come into existence?

            They’re multitasking robots able to do a range of complex tasks, sure they’ll stock shelves oneday but the most cost effective and therefore first uses will be in hostile environments where it’s very expensive to have humans work. Undersea welding for example is a brutal job which requires all sorts of safety and habitability stuff that makes it hugely expensive even before the high wages those people earn - cutting this from the cost of infrastructure projects will make it much tcheaper for offshore wind projects. Especially as working conditions and human considerations make it impossible for continuous work where as robots can just work until its done.

            My dad was the first of our male line to live over 35 in five generations, he was also the first never to work down a mine - people just used to accept poor people dying as the cost of living comfortably lives, the work needed to be done so someone had to do it… just as how I can’t imagine being in the situation of my grandfather so too will humanity move beyond the destruction of our lives that forced drudgery brings upon us.

            Rich people don’t choose to stand stacking shelves all day, there’s a reason for that. Do not fight to keep such awful things, fight to make a world where we can live well without needing them

  • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well my time to scheduled su1c1de just fast forwarded a little, or we can also get a gun and blast these things before it gets out of hand

  • MeanEYE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Waiting any minute for Musk to come out and say how Tesla is the most advanced robot manufacturing company still, because he can’t stand not being in the spotlight.

    • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It looks like an improvement 😔. I mean fuck! I can’t even limbo that low much less get up from 0 to upright folding my legs around like that. But my face lamp is pretty bright! Just upgraded to LEDs and now I’m like a walking sun. I think they just copied me like that. And I got two ears not just one lowly antenna. So that’s not an upgrade.

      Now they just need a silicone dildo, some silicone glue and a famous pornstar actress. That would sell a lot of droids this Christmas. Lots of Jewish, Jehovahs, Catholic, Christian, Protestant, Muslim men would be very interested…and women too. Specially if they come preprogrammed or programmable for special work like that.

    • @egeres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think they specifically chose that to display that it has no “forward” axis, robots don’t need to be 100% anthropomorphic and follow our biological limitations, this is a very significant evolution in design that will allow for better mobility

        • Hemingways_Shotgun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          I’d argue that the wheel was invented not because “walking” was inefficient, but because flesh is weak and gets tired.

          A robot doesn’t have that weakness. It thinks nothing of running five hours at high speed if necessary. It has no need of wheels if it can just Gump it cross country with cargo on his back a la Death Stranding.

        • @egeres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Yes, very good point!

          I wonder if someday in the future we might use reinforcement learning to iterate over different mechanical designs to explore even more exotic combinations of wheels, springs, hydraulic pistons, steel wires, legs and joints (optimizing for metrics like mobility etc). I even wonder if flexible joints made out of hard rubber could offer any advantages on bipedal motion

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They might be able to ride bikes at some point.

          I think the benefits to making them humanoid are underrated in this comment section.

    • @anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      This is probably the best way to get up if your joints can fully rotate. If you look closely, the legs are exactly below the center of mass when they touch the ground, making it easy to push upwards without falling over.

      Humans just have to make complicated contortions or jump up because our joints are inferior (there are no slip rings for blood vessels).

  • @Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Vaseline…Invest in Vaseline when the robot army comes. They can’t do shit with Vaseline on their camera lenses.

  • ☂️-
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    cool, so they can do the grueling work for us so we can enjoy life… right?

    • atocci
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      The treasonous Automaton-sympathizing scum…

  • @rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    Did you know there is an industry-standard mounting system for strap-on dildos? Just saying.