• @cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    6510 months ago

    Lies and exaggerated advertising.

    No, it’s not “best in the world” or “lightning fast”, it’s an entry level $200 GPU!

    No, it doesn’t have “crystal clear high-res screen”, it’s just a budget phone!

    No, that tampon will not change my lifestyle!

    No, that perfume will not make guys drooling over me!

    I’m ok with “it’s decent quality with an affordable price”.

    I’m ok with “it’s the best budget-friendly option”.

    I’m ok with “it’s not the best in the world, but it’s definitely worth a try”.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I personally think the “how good is it” part of “advertising” should literally just be a percentage value of “how many existing customers say it was worth it”.

      But even that would get gamed the way 5/5 amazon reviews can be bought today already.

      So maybe it should really just be “it’s a insert thing made out of insert material produced in insert country by insert labour conditions and it costs insert price”.

  • 🦄🦄🦄
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    25
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Killing animals for pleasure.

    Edit: I love how the voting discrepancy here shows the hypocrisy lol

            • @stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              Absolutely, the biggest nature lovers in my family are all hunters, they enjoy being in the woods, they enjoy seeing animals, they follow the rules to only harvest as much they are allowed and only during the season permitted.

            • @stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              So people go out, shoot a deer and just leave it there?

              Seems like an extreme waste to me…

              • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                It’s usually not that much extra effort to take the carcass and bring it to a butcher, so they do that sometimes. But yeah. Often, just leave it.

                It’s actually not all that bad because we have a lack of natural predators (because we already hunted them almost to extinction) so hunting keeps the deer population from exploding.

      • Swordgeek
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Trophy hunting, after all this time, is still legal and big business.

      • Io Sapsai 🌱
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        It’s generally legal and heavily subsidised. See also animal agriculture.

          • 🦄🦄🦄
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            -710 months ago

            So you agree that if it isn’t for sustenance, in the case where you can just simply eat something else, it should be illegal?

            • @otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              Sustenance doesn’t mean “the only thing available”.

              Look, I’m excited for lab-grown meat. I’ve reduced my meat consumption significantly over the last year or two. I may not be “in your camp” exactly, but I’m an ally. And it’s probably better to earn and keep allies than to argue semantics in an adversarial way. Win more flies with honey and all that.

              • 🦄🦄🦄
                link
                fedilink
                Deutsch
                -210 months ago

                I assume you agree o the general statement “Animals shouldn’t be killed for pleasure.”

                If you then have two options for food, one including animal meat and one without, all other things being equal, even nutrition wise, then how is it not “for pleasure” to chose the option with meat?

                • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -110 months ago

                  for most people making taht decision does not involve killing anything. both options have already been harvested and presented.

                • @otp@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  Killing for pleasure implies hunting for sport.

                  Chopping up a cow so that tons of people can buy its meat is different than someone hunting bears for sport and leaving the corpse where it lands.

  • @theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4110 months ago

    Conflicts of interest. Sometimes illegal, but not nearly as much as they should be (almost always)

    Like congress members being allowed to trade stock, which can then be affected by their vote

    Or one of the specifically carved out exceptions to the medical kickbacks laws is for the people who negotiate drug prices for pharmacies

    • @Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1210 months ago

      Already illegal (without proper licence) in most first world countries. Or at least not as unregulated as as in Murica

    • @stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      They shouldn’t be illegal, but heavily regulated.

      I mean, hunting and harvesting meat is far more ethical to the normal meat industry.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        fedilink
        -7
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Most people in countries where guns are regulated would not get access to a gun for hunting, mind you. Unless your job is to be a forester, which over here includes selectively shooting animations to balance populations if something goes out of balance.

        “I want to get my own deer meat from the forest” is not a valid reason to get a gun. Or even a bow!

        • @stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          I like the theory of gun laws in Sweden.

          You can only get a gun if you are actively in need of one, there are only two legal way to be in need of one, hunting and competition.

          You need to get a hunting license from a school, join a hunting society and be an active member to get a permit for gun, or you need to actively compete in a shooting club to get a competition permit. You also need to demonstrate competence and skill before you get a permit regardless of if you are a hunter or a competitor.

          Getting a gun for personal safety is not permitted, and to be frank, it isn’t really needed here, we have few dangerous animals, and despite the rise of gang violence, Sweden is still a safe country.

      • @breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -810 months ago

        Yes. Every hunter is ethical and will absolutely nail every shot to make sure the animal doesn’t suffer and die a slow death. A hunter missing the killshot and instead wounding the animal? Never happens.

        /s

        • @stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          Of course it happens, but for the absolute majority of it’s life, even a wounded animal has lived a life in freedom and nature, a proper hunter would absolutely track and deal with a wounded animal to reduce suffering and preserve the meat.

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8510 months ago

    Collection of personally identifiable information on every website ever.

    Corporate murder.

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    2910 months ago

    When you are in a political position you are not allowed to lie.

    • @rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      We have to develop the technology to perfectly detect lies and give everyone who wants to be in office a collar which gives them seizures when lying.

      Every Parlament around the world would look like a Harlem shake gone wrong.