• @Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      You do have the benefit of being right though.

      The word octopus is a classical Greek word that comes to English via Latin. The Greek plural is octopodes, the Latin plural is octopi. But we don’t speak Latin or classical Greek. We speak English. Because octopus is the English word for octopus it follows the English rules for pluralization, which is to add “s” or “es” to the end of the word. Cases can be made why octopi and octopodes could be technically correct, but for English speakers octopuses is the most correct.

      • @Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Yeah, I did something for work where I had to study up about it and instead of being angry it’s just kind of a fun fact. I don’t actually mind what people say, I think everyone understands what you mean regardless.

  • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Wait is seriously everyone in here wrong?

    Guys it’s:
    OCTOPEOPLE

    Inclusion, let’s keep it up.

    • Preußisch Blau
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      A hypercorrection based on a misunderstanding of the Latin declension for the word, at that.

        • @qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          My favorite hypercorrection (a hyperforeignism, if you like) is “habañero,” and really stressing the “ñ” when you say it.

          Except it’s just “habanero,” plain ol’ “n.” The confusion is presumably due to “jalapeño” having an accent.

          • @lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            If you want a hyper anglizism: I’m German and after an interview, a colleague of mine talked about the candidates’ “vibes”. My boss didn’t get it’s English and once she did, she pronounced it like “wipes”. b>p at the end of words is what German always does and v>w to make it sound English since German has the /v/ sound but not /w/. I don’t think it’s a common thing tho.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you say ok-top-o-dees, you’d better be prepared to deliver this spiel at a moment’s notice

      HA! That video was really good. Extremely quick and to the point, great linguistics content, and funny to boot!

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    Btw is there a difference between people.and persons? I hear both being used but i grew up with people.

    • @RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Great question. When I hear people I think that’s used to draw attention to common relevant traits “people of England” for example. Persons is more a group of less related individuals or at least with less relevant similarities “persons of interest” for example

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      I mostly write ‘indexes’ these days when I’m not on autopilot, in part since not all of my coworkers have a high English proficiency and just following the normal +(e)s plural makes it easier. My brain really does not want me to write ‘matrixes’ however (and indeed, my dictionary in this browser is fine with ‘indexes’ but not ‘matrixes’). I also try not to be pedantic with verbs whose irregular forms have become less common than their “incorrect” (at least when I was taught) forms. “Shined” being one of these, but I am sure there are more.

      • @null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Then the meme is formatted incorrectly. Or “correctly”, if we define correct as “incorrect, but, you get it, so…”

        • @Poik@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          Except, usage defines language. If it didn’t, English wouldn’t exist. Therefore, usage is correct when people understand and use it.

            • @Poik@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Then why are you saying it’s incorrectly formatted? I’m directly backing its premise.

              • @null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                “Octopi” is only “correct” because of common usage. Octopus does not have a Latin origin, so it doesn’t make sense to pluralize it that way. Which is to say it’s not technically correct, it’s just “correct”.

                In the proper format of this meme, the wojack in the middle should be obsessed with technical correctness, while the one on the right is fine with merely “correctness” (as in, enough people use it to make it understood).

                But since you can understand it, the format is merely “correct” (I’m being tongue-in-cheek to make a point)

    • @Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Octopuses is correct if you’re referring to many different species of octopus. Octopi would be correct if you’re referring to a cluster of one species of octopus.

      • @null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        Octopi would be correct if you’re referring to a cluster of one species of octopus.

        Based on what?

    • @Ropianos@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      -29 months ago

      The Latin origin. Words ending on -us turn almost always into -i in plural in Latin. And that’s where it comes from (octo eight, pus/pes foot).

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    179 months ago

    Octopus, octopuses, and octopodes are correct. Octopi incorrect.

    • Xavienth
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Octopi is also correct. If anything, more correct than octopodes by virtue of popularity. Mismatching the language to the suffix does not a fake word make!

      The downvoters are silly prescriptivists ;)