• @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    266 months ago

    I really don’t think Baldur’s gate 3 and whatever the fuck Monopoly go is are the same kind of thing.

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      The fact that they think it’s part of the same strategy is why they fail. They take a cursory look at both, see numbers go up, and think that all they have to do is push for common element X to succeed.

      Gross oversimplification of business strategy and how products are built are why corporations trip over their own dicks over and over again. I wish they would just teach that in business school.

      • @shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Business school isn’t about learning to make money, it’s about indoctrinating idiots that already have too much money

  • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    886 months ago

    They probably should have thought longer about the success of Baldur’s Gate 3 before burning their bridge with Larian.

    It wasn’t their IP that made it succeed, it was the quality of the developer. D&D as a brand is worthless if they just sell it to the highest bidder and don’t give a damn about quality.

    • ayaya
      link
      fedilink
      English
      256 months ago

      On the bright side I would much rather see a Divinity Original Sin 3 than a Baldur’s Gate 4 from Larian. Now they are free to do their own thing again.

      • swab148
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 months ago

        They said that their next game will be a brand new IP!

    • @WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Tbf Divinity: Original Sin 2 did not come anywhere near BG3 levels of popularity. The difference between those can really only be attributed to the value of brand recognition.