• @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    No busy roads, no flights with very few onboard, no views from balconies or other such places like large hotel windows. Cook everything yourself and you’ll be alright!

  • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Man, lots of crazy, unrealistic advice here.

    One person literally said to live in a motel. No, do not live alone.

    The answer is pretty simple, live in a community house with like 8 other people.

    • @daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      8 potential aids for your murder.

      They just have to say: “I give you 1.000.000 bucks if you give this food to that person, it will look like a bad flu and you’ll get the money”. If one rejects the offer there’s 7 more to do so.

      • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        I said community. Thats no community if your friends would take money to kill you.

        Have you ever lived in a community?

          • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Ive lived in a lot of communities. Certainly there’s drama, especially with house-cest.

            But comparing that to people literally taking money to kill each other is ridiculous lol

            Worst I’ve seen is rape (sadly common). And you bet that rapist was physcially kicked out almost immediately

  • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Human beings are fragile creatures. Big corps generally don’t need to make the big effort of a murder and a cover-up when they can almost completely legally harass people into taking their own lives.

    To that end? Get a good therapist and a psych. Preferably not on workplace insurance, if such a thing is feasible for the situation.

  • @CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -24 months ago

    I can’t believe no one has said to keep and train with a gun. The best way to live is to kill your killer. Secure channels and home security cameras won’t do shit if you don’t have a good way to physically defend yourself.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      This isn’t the movies. They aren’t sending one person you can get into a fight with. They’ll just shoot you and ransack your house to make it look like you died in a robbery gone wrong. Just don’t be there.

      • @CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So, what, just be homeless instead? I don’t understand how having a tool to physically defend your corporeal form could possibly be a bad thing, and this counterpoint makes no sense.

        *living in a van could actually be a decent protective measure though, so that’s kinda funny.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Yeah, until the danger is passed at any rate. Homeless doesn’t need to mean in the streets though.

      • @CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago
        1. That’s why I said keep and train, as in practice often and thoroughly. If you just buy a gun and shove it in your nightstand, you’re not going to be effective with it. You have to practice to get good, and that practice will save you if it ever comes to it.

        2. Just because a gun won’t magically eradicate the killer for you, it’s not worth having? If we’re talking about maximally increasing the odds of your survival, we should be including every advantage you can get. If two people are being targeted for a killing, assuming all else is equal, the one that has a gun they are proficient with on their person is objectively more likely to survive than the one that doesn’t. You don’t need to be John Wick, you just need to not die.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    175
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Edward Snowden is a prime example of how to handle it.

    Only communicated via encrypted channels.

    When revealing himself and his leak, he had already left his home country. He was trying to make it to South America when the US canceled his passport. US went so far as to bring down a sovereign nations Presidential plane to search it for Snowden.

    I’m sure he has still had to worry about his personal safety after getting stuck in a country he wasn’t planning on getting stuck in.

    But the reality is you have to meticulously plan and basically abandon your entire life and move somewhere they cannot touch you. When it comes to US companies, you generally will have to do like Snowden and avoid US-allied nations.

    See also: Steven Donziger and Chevron

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Donziger

    Donziger was placed under house arrest in August 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of criminal contempt of court, which arose during his appeal against Kaplan’s RICO decision, when he refused to turn over electronic devices he owned to Chevron’s forensics experts. In July 2021, US District Judge Loretta Preska found him guilty, and Donziger was sentenced to 6 months in jail in October 2021. While Donziger was under house arrest in 2020, twenty-nine Nobel laureates described the actions taken by Chevron against him as “judicial harassment.” Human rights campaigners called Chevron’s actions an example of a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). In April 2021, six members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus demanded that the Department of Justice review Donziger’s case. In September 2021, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights stated that the pre-trial detention imposed on Donziger was illegal and called for his release. Having spent 45 days in prison and a combined total of 993 days under house arrest, Donziger was released on April 25, 2022.

    US corporations can and will bring the weight of the US “justice” system on whistleblowers. The US is not unique in this regard. Whatever giant company you’re whistleblowing against, you better GTFO of the country they are based in.

    • CrimeDad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      US went so far as to bring down a sovereign nations Presidential plane to search it for Snowden.

      I wonder if Morales got any concessions for agreeing to land his plane and allow a search.

      • cabbage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        He was a democratically elected leader from the left in Latin America. Not being murdered in his sleep could be considered special concessions.

    • Nyxicas
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      The United States - Freedom of Corruption, Indignity and Distrust for All!

    • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      904 months ago

      Yeah so many people talk about Snowden going to Russia and ignore the fact that he was only in Russia transferring to another plane when his passport was cancelled stranding him there. The choice was basically stay there, or go back to the US, and that wasn’t really an option.

      Why the US would want to leave him in Russia as a potential asset for Russian intelligence to break instead of letting him get to a different country that isn’t such a direct threat though is a really good question.

      • @Forester@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        544 months ago

        Easy. They got to call him a Russian operative and brush it under the rug. Go ask the average person about snowden

        • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          174 months ago

          They can say whatever they want about him without actually stranding him in Russia to literally be a potential further leak. The info he leaked is different than his knowledge of processes and systems.

          • @Forester@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            But he was a data analyst so his knowledge of processes and systems would be basically useless as all he would have known would have been how to access the file stores that were being gathered and provided by other agencies for his agency to review. It’s not like if Russia put him on a rack and tortured him. They’d find much useful information. At worst they would be able to confirm things they already very strongly suspect.

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      Snowden was an IT expert, it certainly helps. His book is a great read.

  • @BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Despite all precautions, if you are one of the few persons whose circumstances could allow the leak, then they’ll narrow it down to you. Especially if you were the reluctant one, the one that raised ethical issues etc…

  • @Overboard8171@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    264 months ago

    Don’t leak. Spread seldom rumours online about the company with plausible deniability. Find a crazy-er person and/or group. Continue spreading dots. Spread info to Youtubers. Others with a platform. Use a VM, a password manager inside the VM. After 12 months, delete all your credentials and the VM. The system can not protect you. Corps rule democracy. Don’t trust the system. Spread the info until it reaches critical mass or the faith in the system collapses. Your life is worth more than some righteous leak. See the Pentagon Papers life. He lived a very humble life afterwards.

    NOTE: method untested and invented just now.

    • @reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      wouldnt it just drown with all the insane crap the crackpots spew anyway and become tainted by association with them? But yeah, you definitely shouldnt use your own name and should spread the leak all over.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashedOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      School aint teaching this shit. That would imply that you should be a whistleblower or be a witness to wrongdoings. No way governments would let this be taught.

      This is what parents should be teaching at home.

          • Em Adespoton
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            Worth noting that this is something that can change over time. For example, if Snowden had done such a thing, it would be essentially useless now, since the known and accepted activities of the US government are now worse than what Snowden revealed.

      • @lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Not necessarily. The only people who would need to know are the people who are already researching you to have you killed for a potential leak, and they would operate under the assumption of a DMS in place already.

  • hendrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    249
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Take the advice offered by journalists on how to contact them privately and avoid getting caught. I.e. secure and protect evidence without raising suspicion. Contact a reputable journalist via some secure means of communication. Let them take over and keep silent. Don’t brag or something.

    Most good newspapers offer something like PGP encrypted mail, SecureDrop over TOR and more to talk to them.

    • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      191
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This children is why the need for private communication isn’t something you can laugh away by claiming you have nothing to hide.

      • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        524 months ago

        Absolutely. There are many reasons, but attacks on journalists/whistleblowers and the malicious potential of collated data in a capitalist oligarchy are the first two that come to mind.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Yeah but I am a wagie within the system… Its all good, I am daddy’s team

    • @tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      274 months ago

      Encrypt email with anyone who publishes a key. If “bad” emails are the only ones you encrypt, then that metadata can be used to raise suspicion of you and to trace your contacts.

  • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    584 months ago

    While it won’t help you getting suicided, setting up a deadman’s switch on the cloud that will release your testimony is definitely worth doing.

    • Aa!
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      With whistleblower information, why hold it back in the first place? Wouldn’t it be better to release it immediately if they might kill you either way?

      • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        IIRC the problem there is that it potentially makes you liable to be sued by the company for disclosing negative/private information. But they can’t exactly hold you liable if you’re dead, so if you’re dead you may as well speak what you know from beyond the grave.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 months ago

      Additionally, give a copy of all the documents to your lawyer to release in the case of your death. Multiple Deadman switches are better than one, especially one that’s controlled by a person and not just hoping your cloud service doesn’t go down after you’re dead.