“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    These CEOs are funding hate, violence and the end of American democracy - they have enough power, money and influence to oppose, yet they don’t. They decided that a few must be sacrificed for the greater good profit.

    Something happened on the 4th of December. Today is the 4th of January. Just in case anyone’s calendar app is stuck closed. Interesting if true…

  • @JamesFire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6715 days ago

    I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

    Why would you do that though? The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it’s not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

    • @groet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      315 days ago

      They do better about privacy because they make enough money from their inflated prices and blind brand loyalty where they dont have to become an ad company like google. Google is very good at protecting their users data from third parties, as long as they can still collect all of it.

      Apple (currently) doesn’t collect a lot of data which allows them to design products with security as a primary component instead of as an afterthought

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1015 days ago

      The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy.

      Where did you hear this? Its my understanding that they are one of the worst when it comes to privacy.

      • Bakkoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1015 days ago

        Siri “unintentionally” (because it’s a sentient being right?) recording entire conversations def feels pretty terrible.

      • @homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1415 days ago

        Microsoft didn’t spend multiple decades trying to force their own chargers and ports over universal standards. Not saying any of them are good, but apple is in no way better and has spent years creating contention between consumers. It’s just as likely they sell your tracking data as anyone else, they spend developer time every month making sure their ecosystem is considered better for cultural reasons while being ostensibly worse than competitors for most things. Their phones are generally a year or more behind competitors but they have made-up features that serve no purpose consumers rally around like imessage. They have a tiny sandbox to play in without completely voiding your warranty - Themes instead of real customization. “Blue bubbles”? Are you kidding me? How about allowing any form of tinkering beyond a garden path? How about supporting repair of devices at their actual branded stores? They’re easily up there as one of the worst for consumers at large.

        • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -10
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I’m really not interested in a long, drawn out debate about this, suffice to say that if you think all the things you listed, most of which are your opinion rather than indisputable fact, somehow make Apple worse than Google, Microsoft, or Meta … well let’s just agree to disagree.

      • @lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        I have my own problems with them, but off the top of my head I think the following tech companies all do better than Apple: Red Hat, Canonical, Framework, Purism, System76, Fairphone.

      • @Chewget@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 days ago

        At least with android devices there is a possibility of swapping the operating system and windows computers can always be made Linux.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      1715 days ago

      They just settled Siri snoop case for a fee pennies…

      “Privacy”

      • y0kai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 days ago

        would a nice $20 bill appease the peasantry?

    • @ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4815 days ago

      IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        less interest than Google in selling data for advertising

        Google don’t sell data. The data is what makes them valuable, so it wouldn’t make sense. If they did sell data, the other big tech companies would just buy their data to remove their competitive advantage.

        What Google actually sells is your attention. Advertisers can target people based on demographic data, things you like, etc, but the advertiser never sees the data used for targeting.

        You can use Google and Facebook’s Ads Manager sites yourself and see exactly what advertisers see.

        On the other hand, Apple mostly keep their collected data for their own ad network. Yes, they have one - it’s mostly just used for ads for “recommended” apps in the app store, but last I heard, they have plans to expand it.

          • @dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            415 days ago

            No worries - it’s a pretty common misconception that tech companies sell data. I’ve worked on ads systems at big tech companies so I’ve seen some parts of how it works. The companies are very protective of their data as it’s essentially their highest-value asset. Employees can’t see any of your data either - it’s very tightly locked down, with strict ACLs and audit logging.

            Large advertisers generally don’t get any special access either - the tools/apps that large advertisers use are mostly the same as what small advertisers / individuals can see and use.

  • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8515 days ago

    Why does such a thing as an inaugural fund exist? Seems like it’s just to facilitate more corruption!

  • @fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1715 days ago

    They’re all “donating” the same amount.

    And also this is the largest inaugural fund in history. In comparison to his previous which was $107m this is so far over $150m.

    Considering Bidens and both of Obamas were between $50m and $70m is this not ringing alarm bells with anyone? Or is this something to “look” in to in like 7 years time when no one gives a shit.

    Beggars belief.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      013 days ago

      This is how things are going to work going forward.

      Even if it is illegal, these people are above the law. Internet just exposing obvious corruption.

  • BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    1615 days ago

    Corruption as always. Regular donations ensure that whoever is currently holding power isn’t going to cause [regulatory] problems

    • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2115 days ago

      It’s worse than that. There’s a level of hypocrisy here in that a company marketing itself as inclusive has a CEO who is donating to a far right, authoritarian slush fund. This isn’t business as usual.

      • BlackLaZoR
        link
        fedilink
        515 days ago

        This isn’t business as usual

        It is. The hypocrisy is part of the business itself. Democrats are in power - you market inclusiveness and donate to democrats. Republicans win - you donate to republicans.

        And in reality - you don’t give a fuck about politics, you just play the rigged game by its twisted rules.

          • BlackLaZoR
            link
            fedilink
            -2315 days ago

            You don’t see Democrats openly lining up to declare war on minorities

            Yeah, you see them declaring war on the majority. The result is Trump winning the elections.

            • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1615 days ago

              Republicans also declare war on the majority but their voters aren’t smart enough to realize.

  • @Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6515 days ago

    It’s not going to make him remember your actual name, Tim.

    You’ll always be Tim Apple to him.

    • ALQ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1315 days ago

      Time to make him Tim Apple to everyone else, too.

    • @boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      615 days ago

      They’re the only one selling physical products as their main business so they can afford to give you marginally better privacy and UX than say, Google, who’s built their business on tying tracking and advertising into their open source products like Chromium and Android.