• @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    It would be tight if there was a local option(What we have now) and a All option that let’s you see all the communities across all federated spaces that share that same name.

  • @AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    02 months ago

    The chronically online weirdos on world don’t like the chronically online weirdos on ml. They are both chronically online weirdos and I try to view these really active communities or names I recognize like a zoo. These people are throwing shit at eachother for our amusement. Keep it separate.

  • @meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    102 months ago

    Your proposal is much too streamlined.

    Perhaps you presume memes are a commodity of which consumption should be maximized!

    Nay, I say. Memes are an essential nutrient that becomes toxic in larger doses.

    Thus, they must be scattered about in the environment to be encountered by happenstance whilst I pursue my main information foraging goal of finding ad hoc justification for my durable sense of dread.

    Memes, uhh, find a way.

    Do whatever you want but I am planning many epic shitposts pretty much anywhere I can get a reaction.

  • Karu 🐲
    link
    fedilink
    952 months ago

    There was some proposal that I have seen multiple times on Lemmy and at least once on the GitHub repo that communities should be able to subscribe to each other much like users can subscribe to communities. I vastly prefer this to other proposals such as auto-merging communities with the same name, which I can think of a few ways that can go wrong.

    It would also be reasonably intuitive for the average user, since following stuff is already a familiar action you take on social media. You wouldn’t really need to understand the quirks of federation to know why posting to one community makes it appear on other downstream communities. And as far as I know about ActivityPub (which is admittedly not much), it’s not a stretch use it to implement a feature like this.

    I wonder if this proposal ever reached anywhere.

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      A better proposal in my eyes would be a “improved cross-post”. Currently crossposts are just posts that link to the other post, thus making two separate conversations and double the spam for people.

      My proposal would be for a crosspost to act like a true link to the original, where people wouldn’t see them as two independent psots but the cross posting would just expand the amount of people that sees the original. Users that click on the cross posted post are directed to the instance it was originally posted, and the conversations are kept simple.

      I guess that to implement this we would need to change how a post appears to people, it would in a way look like a post from community A that shows in community B, but the ID of the post is the same so it shows up once in feeds. Dunno.

      • Karu 🐲
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        The idea that I’m talking about is actually more like communities forming a network, with chains of following. If I host a new instance and create a memes community in it, I’d like to start having that community follow memes @ lemmy.ml and memes @ lemmy.world, so that the community already has content from the get-go, but users may be able to post memes that are unique to my instance and its followers. The followers would also see memes from upstream unless my community unfollows them, as long as they don’t also follow them independently.

        This model of the network would allow each community to independently determine which other communities it thematically implies, without the user having to follow all 4 communities with the same name but different content across the platform.

        The multireddit suggestion is more like having directories/tags for communities. It wouldn’t achieve quite the same thing, but it would be useful as well. Both ideas can coexist and complement each other.

        • Peter_ArbeitslosOP
          link
          fedilink
          122 months ago

          That’s a hyperlink. Some new www-stuff which was recently developed in one of our planet’s greates research Institutes which also has a great particle collider.

    • Peter_ArbeitslosOP
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      One main community greater than others with the same topic on a decetralized platform ≠ centralization.

      • @OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        82 months ago

        To be fair, it is one form of centralization; although, I admit, I was twisting the meaning of the term a bit to fit my sarcastic remark.

        That being said, as primarily a shitposting lurker who only occasionally actually creates content designed for sharing, I don’t mind the extra communities. I’m no stranger to seeing reposts, and I get my kicks from leaving the odd comment that may or may not spawn some sort of rant (usually from myself, not the other parties), but hopefully just tickles someone, and then scrolling to the next. If it’s the same thing, I just keep scrollin’.

        I could see how it would be irritating to post to multiple communities designed around the same idea, but perhaps the solution is more like turning each community into an aggregate of all similar communities. You could opt your community into a master community, and any post made in one would get shared to all of them.

  • t�m
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    no, because not everyone likes to join lemmy.world because of the fedipact.

    • Peter_ArbeitslosOP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We could find a solution for that, couldn’t we?

      E: It’s something the mods have to discuss about (the community can take part in that discussion too, democracy and stuff). We could for example merge to lemmy.ml.

      • SomeLemmyUser
        link
        fedilink
        72 months ago

        To be fair, one can have good reasons against .ml as well as .world

        Having two communities is not the worst idea imho

      • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️
        link
        fedilink
        82 months ago

        You put it better than I could, it’s exactly the self-righteousness that puts me off. And they basically control what gets defederated singlehandedly.