• ugjka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1502 years ago

    One more reason to stick with Firefox

    • King
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1212 years ago

      Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

        • King
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -572 years ago

          The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

          • Beaupedia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            132 years ago

            I think you’re a little confused about what’s being said here.

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -252 years ago

              I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

          • @qfjp@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            262 years ago

            It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -182 years ago

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              • @qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

                • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
                • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…”
                • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?”

                also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

                And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

                I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

                Flash used to be a mobile extension…

                • King
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -122 years ago

                  What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                  And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

        • King
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Idk what u mean but whatever ad scenario u have going on in your brain, i said extensions supported, which means adblocks included

        • ⁧⁧⁧
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You do realize other mobile browsers also come with an ad blocker…right? Look up Vivaldi for example.

  • @juice@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    First? What about Kiwi browser? Edit: I just remembered even old firefox supported most desktop addons…

  • ColorcodedResistor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    Holy Fuck. Call me Ramsay, Finally some delicious fucking tech. the separation gap between mobile and pc has been going on for far too long. anything to help merge the pair. yes. all the yes.

  • @where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    No, no, no! It was supporting all the desktop extensions. For years. Until the damn buggy rewrite for no good reason. And then we were suddenly left with like 5 of them.

    For a year after that I was still running the last stable release. But unfortunately the web evolves too fast.

        • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Not all extensions appear to be compatible at the moment. I know if I add a couple of my favorite desktop extensions to my collection that it breaks.

          • @landsharkkidd@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Hmm… interesting. I’m able to use ublock and two extensions for fanfiction. That’s interesting that it just breaks for you.

            • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Maybe you’re lucky with your extensions of choice.

              I’m not saying all extensions I tried adding broke the collection - only a couple did; the other extensions worked as expected.

              • @landsharkkidd@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Yeah I suppose so. I have a BUNCH of extension on my desktop Firefox, but I don’t need much on my mobile version tbh. Especially since I have a few extensions that work for websites that already have apps (like I have sponsorblock and pockettube for YouTube but there’s no point in installing them on my mobile FF since I have the YouTube app so…).

                • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  I actively don’t use the YouTube app.

                  No adblocker, sponsorblock, or return the dislike button.

                  I also don’t use the app for a website if the mobile website is good enough. Less software on my phone, so a reduced amount of storage used on apps, fewer updates, hopefully reduced CPU and battery consumption, fewer security issues, reduced data collection, and my phone is just a little cleaner to use. Everyone has their own preference, this is just mine :)

    • @Blimp7990@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      “no good reason”

      spoken like someone who has never tried to use that browser. it definitely supported addons, but tried to implement 2015 features to run on 2002-tier hardware

      • @ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        It still does, experimentally, if you enable developer settings, rather unintuitively through a Firefox Add-Ons account. Developer settings are not available in the official release but the Nightly builds as well as some forks, like 🦊Fennec, include them. Of course the addon settings often look out of place on a small screen and things like uBlock’s Block Element picker do not work as intended.

        • @Blimp7990@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          fennec is just the code name for the rewrite, hence the fdroid built-from-source name

          theres a limited number of available addons in fennec unless you go through hoops (used to be you could make a ‘collection’ dunno if thats still the dumbass-workaround-of-choice for the dumbass devs)

          • @ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Well, the bizarre collection workaround is present in Beta and Nightly releases as well, and is intentionally well hidden. It also allows installing/uninstalling extensions quickly when testing on multiple devices, or sharing extension collections with testers. It is indeed needlessly convoluted for users but I would not describe the workaround as dumbass if it works well for the intended audience. You are correct, plenty of Firefox’s advantages can only be achieved by modifying the settings from defaults, often through developers’ hacky about:config keys. Mozilla thinks that mass adoption and their financial security is only possible if they make a noob-friendly browser with a few big buttons and Google search so tech-savvy people need to jump through hoops (profile importing etc.) to quickly set up the browser to their liking.

            • @Blimp7990@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Its dumbass because if the addons work on mobile, let people use them. Instead they said “you can use these 5 addons, and you can use any addon you please if you jump through our hoops, like setting compact mode to enabled in about:config because we want to gather usage data that shows nobody misses compact mode”.

              I’m *genuinely *shocked the folks at mozilla are even bothering to finish addon support.

              Like don’t get me wrong, i love firefox and I support them in general, but holy shit is firefox gunning for its current userbase in an attempt to synthesize users that may or may not exist. And I think the way they manage these contentious choices is poor at best. Where the scale is from how-signal-removed-sms to the-windows-11-taskbar, they get 138.2.

  • Cam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -52 years ago

    Now Brave needs to do the same and also create its own extension store

    • @Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Brave is a ticking clock counting down. They can continue putting off some of the chromium updates that Google is pushing but eventually they are going to go the way of the rest of the chromium forks.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Does this mean that the storage API will finally be available on mobile? At the moment this is probably my biggest annoyance since I have to manually transfer allow lists for various extensions across desktop and mobile.

  • @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’ll be impressed when they actually allow for the installation of extensions from places other than their addon store like I can on the desktop version. Maybe in another 5 years, if Mozilla lasts that long.

  • @vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Been using Iceraven, although it only supports a handful of extensions such as dark reader and uBlock

  • Gyoza Power
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    Kiwi broswer already does it, same with the Orion browser for iOS

  • @Leminator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    This sounds huge! This may be a dumb question, but: do extensions on mobile require any special security tools that don’t already exist?

  • dantheclamman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I wish they’d add a tablet UI. Doesn’t seem to be prioritized whatsoever. Pre-Fenix they had it and have been patiently waiting for tabs to return on large screens ever since, but have lost hope.