• RaivoKulli
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      It’s great because of how serious that post is then there’s a totally tonally different killer joke lol

  • ineedaunion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong. The Home Depot is the same way and allows rapes and retaliation. HR is a scam. All they deserve is violence.

      • ineedaunion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -52 years ago

        You’ll lose to the GOP who actually do it because you sit there and do nothing.

        • stevedidWHAT
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          Wow you’re literally the walking definition of radicalized, edgelord teenager or boomer with lead poisoning?

          Don’t you have capital to storm again there potato chip bandit? Would love to send some more of you emotional LARPers to jail

            • stevedidWHAT
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Ew, someone generalizing my politics. Go check out my post history.

              Thanks for being part of the problem, nut job.

              Edit: and just in case I need to spell it out, it’s ACAB, BLM, LGBTQIA and sweeping progressive reform for life without direct provocation of violence for life, like it or not.

      • ineedaunion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        Says every blue voter who wonders why women lost their right to choose.

  • Extras
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “Damage control, its there when you need to cover your ass. Speaking of covers this is the perfect segue to our sponsor, Dbrand…”

  • @kftX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    572 years ago

    The end result will likely be something like: “We have investigated ourselves and found that we are blameless of any wrongdoing”. Which is usually how these things end up.

    Also, weird to not see them saying they’ll reach out to Madison to get the story from her, but I guess that might be one of those obvious things so not mentioned. I hope.

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        It means they’re hiring someone. What will matter is which type of firm they hire:

        1. Firm with a proven track record of being unbiased in their processes and conclusions.

        2. Firm with a track record of finding no fault, only low level scapegoats

        3. Unknown firm, likely the same result as option 2.

      • @FarmTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Third-party investigator is just a long handed way of saying, I’m still paying this person. Unless someone is being forced to be investigated by an outside source, get ready for some bullshit.

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          You pay the investigator whether they find fault against you or not. It’s not like they’re incentivized to find no wrongdoing at all just because they’re being paid. That would actively work against their credibility and long-term survival as a business

      • @hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Yeah I think they have dug themselves in deep shit and this will not go away until they make everything public and take action. And Linus as well as Terren Tong know this.

      • @kftX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        My point is that when you are the one ordering an investigation on yourself, usualyl the results are bound to be highly skewed towards what you want.

        I’ve seen my government recently do this in a pretty big corruption case that would have made heads roll, as well as a couple other private entities I can think of who have hired “outside investigators” to investigate themselves only to go like what I said.

        I’m obviously open to being proven wrong in this case, but the track record of such things isn’t very positive.

        Sorry I wasn’t very clear, I just didn’t want to make my comment too big.

        • @newDayRocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          302 years ago

          Aside from ordering a third party investigator, how else can a company prove to itself and everyone that they are serious about corrective action?

          You’re essentially saying they are guilty of everything and no matter the findings which haven’t even begun, there is a conspiracy. I don’t see how that cynicism is productive.

          • @kftX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            My point is they shouldn’t be the ones doing the auditing (or at least ordering it), it should be an outside source doing it (in this case, I guess a government entity? Or something independent from LMG anyhow).

            I’ll gladly admit to being a cynic, but that’s because I’ve worked in similar work environments, quit for very similar reasons and saw nothing being done too. So it’s a sore spot for me too. I can easily see my own bias in this situation.

            In any case, we’ll have to wait and see how it pans out. Hopefully for the best is what matters in the end.

            • @newDayRocks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              A third party isn’t them though. I get what you are saying because LMG writes the check, but realistically that’s the best anyone can do. Why would the government get involved? Specifically why would taxpayers pay to help rehabilitate a private company’s reputation?

              Private independent auditors are in every industry and a standard practice.

              Oh, and as long as we’re being cynical, let’s say you got your wish and a government entity does the investigation. Odds are they would just contract it out to these same people. Same results, only everyone gets to charge more for their services.

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Issue is they’re trying to investigate something from more than two years ago. They’re unlikely to find anything at all in the first place.

          • @kftX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            That’s also very true, absolutely not gonna disagree there.

            In any case, all we can do is speculate, we will see the end result when it eventually comes out. As long as this brings positive change to LMG as a whole, that’ll be good.

            I know it won’t matter overall, but I won’t see the change since I’ve unsubbed to everything LMG related myself (a long time coming, honestly) but I really do wish them all the best.

    • @Saneless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nah it’ll be “negative” but generic

      “We’ve found that we were set up in a way for people to have suboptimal experiences. We thought we had a good culture and a program to minimize harassment but we obviously let some of our employees down so we are hiring a new chief sensitivity officer to address these concerns and ensure that current and future employees feel welcome,. comfortable, and respected”

      Or some shit. Basically a “yeah things got out of hand but since we’re being scrutinized, we’ll hire an adult to keep us in line, maybe”

      • @MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It’s like, c’mon Linus ‘If my employees need a union, I have failed as a boss’ Sebastian, you have failed as a boss and your employees need a union.

  • @rizoid@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1262 years ago

    I’m starting a new conspiracy that Linus knew all this was coming and that’s why he hired the new CEO. I have no facts but I said it on the internet so people will believe me.

    • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      Linus has a track record and proven history of doing/saying stupid shit. I think in this case, he recognizes that he’s just shit at his job and wants help. He most likely didn’t expect the Billet issue (no way he would have known Steve would have released a vid) and if he knew about Madison coming out, he’d have tried to prevent that sooner. Hiring a CEO won’t fix the Madison problem, as that event had already occurred.

    • @ominouslemon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      742 years ago

      I know you’re kinda joking, but I think there is some truth to that. I think he made the decision because he could not manage the whole thing alone, and the workplace environment Madison described could well be caused by general stress and mismanagement

      • adroit balloon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve been under huge amounts of stress and have been mismanaged, but it never turned me into a grabass bully.

        systemic issues like this don’t just come from nowhere. likewise, they didn’t just appear, either. nor will they simply disappear now that they’ve been exposed or with some glib promise to “do better”.

        workplace atmospheres like this take time to develop and… fester. From what Madison described, it’s been this what from, at least, the time she started, which means these behaviors, these patterns, were existing, likely for some time.

        What Linus knew, when, etc. may important in a civil case, but it’s not to me— He failed at his job, and didn’t ask for help/hire help to fix the problems until faaaar too late. If it was this bad for Madison, it had to be at least as bad if not worse for others before her who simply did not (or could not) speak out, as well as other who are still there.

        Systemic issues do not affect only one person, and they don’t appear out of nowhere. Expect more bad news and expect that any resolution/fixes will take time and major change. If you don’t see any major changes over a reasonable amount of time, don’t trust claims that they’re “working on it."

    • @deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Managing a startup could be hard and stressful. But I couldn’t think Linus would go to this extend.

      After this worker coming forward, I unsubscribed from all LMG channels.

    • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      He took the blame for it in the video because he was in charge when these things happened. I don’t think he’d do that if he whole point was to blame it on the new CEO.

      • @histy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        no no, he took the blame because he had already made a post the day before in which he basically blamed everyone but himself and saw how badly it was received and was probably told by the new CEO to shut up and stop digging his own grave

        • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          He didn’t deflect to the new CEO in the original comment either:

          To my team (and my CEO’s team, but realistically I was at the helm for all of these errors, so I need to own it), I stressed the importance of diligence in our work because there are so many eyes on us. We are going through some growing pains - we’ve been very public about them in the interest of transparency - and it’s clear we have some work to do on internal processes and communication. We have already been doing a lot of work internally to clean up our processes, but these things take time. Rome wasn’t built in a day, but that’s no excuse for sloppiness.

    • @traveler@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      No, he called a new CEO because he knows he’s way over his head for years now. He even spoke about retiring some years ago, that’s how much signs he was showing. The fact he got a new CEO to handle the corpo bs is just a hint that he prefers to mess around with the hardware and just doesn’t want to handle more management shit.

  • @stephenc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    Oh my fucking lord, who cares? Linus has always been a manipulative shitlord and a bastard hyping and doing whatever clickbait will make him millions of dollars this week. Unsubscribe from his manipulative trash and stop talking about him and let his scammy, garbage little YouTube enterprise die as it should have years ago.

    • Discoslugs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      442 years ago

      Unsubscribe from his manipulative trash and stop talking about him

      Peoeple who do bad shit should be exposed before they are forgotten about.

  • @Anonbal185@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I always thought his channel was really dummed down. I watched a video or two and then noped out of it. Wasn’t many if at all any tips from the so called tech tips site.

    Oh and stating the obvious but he’s ‘sorry’ because he got caught.

  • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    It sounds like they are taking her harassment allegations seriously, but not the allegations of excessive levels of work expected, which IMO sounded far more serious. Like having someone grope you is no joke, but having to cut yourself just so you can request a day off is insane

    • @ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      The video they put out yesterday addressed the overwork problems. They were clear in their messaging that they are going to back off on the number of videos they make, or at least that’s what they said. Time will tell.

    • @DarkWasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Too bad no one took it seriously at the time and repeatedly ignored her. It’s so unfortunate only now once its getting media coverage that they’re doing anything.

    • @geek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      I’m sorry but if someone felt like the only way they could take a day off is to cut themselves and then goes through with it, it sort of makes their claims needing more validation as that screams instability and not rational thinking.

      There’s no doubt that there was a actual stress and probably really messed with her mentally. Maybe there were way too high of stakes and too much responsibility for her, but I failed to see why they wouldn’t go to their labor board, or quit if it was something that serious.

      I think it’s insane we throw all of this on the employer, when clearly something wasn’t right with her if this is the case

  • decadentrebel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Linus just needs to miss the Denslow cup and play ball, and he’ll be just fine.

  • DarkThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    762 years ago

    Afaik this (third party) investigation was started by Terren Tong, the CEO, who was not in this position as of this year and Madison left a couple years ago. I think on this part we can at least give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Linus position might be a very different matter though.

    • @Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      I mean he also is a friend of Linus’ going a long while back but I agree he should be given a chance to straighten this out

      • @hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        242 years ago

        Friend yes, but he was his boss, and in linus’s own words, he was the only one who could manage linus. Idk, I am cautiously positive due to the new CEO, but he does still answer to Linus so…

        • @alertsleeper@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Agree, I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt. I personally don’t think I’ll resubscribe and be as much of a follower as I was, but who knows, depending on the end of this all I actually might

    • pachrist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      I have been kind of wondering about that investigation. If their HR is already 3rd party, continuing to use them would technically be a 3rd party investigation. Linus said their HR team is investigating, and they’re hiring someone outside to investigate, are they hiring two HR firms? I looked at LMG’s staff page, and they don’t have any HR listed there. Only a Talent & Culture manager and coordinator. Maybe that’s HR? Seems doubtful.

      I just feel like they might be calling in the same 3rd party HR firm that they’ve been using, find no evidence, and keep on trucking.

      • @GoosLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        We need a second third party HR team to investigate OUR third party HR team, and make sure they stand up to scrutiny!

      • @Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I have been kind of wondering about that investigation. If their HR is already 3rd party, continuing to use them would technically be a 3rd party investigation.

        They have internal HR now but didn’t back then. So bringing in someone new to investigate this sounds like a good step. If they really are serious about this, then it would be one of the only way to get a handle ton this. But of course it all depends on how serious LMG is treating this and how much freedom the investigators have. They could easily try to brush this under the rug when the attention drops. So we’ll see I guess.

    • @StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -32 years ago

      “We’re sorry you found out that sexual misconduct has been a regular occurrence here. We will now take this seriously and ensure you never find out anything like this again. We believe that although sexual assault may happen in the workplace, it is unacceptable for it to be brought to the public’s attention.”