Lemmy.world is temporarily disabling open signups and moving to an application-required signup process, due to ongoing issues with malicious bot accounts.

We know this is a major step to take, but we believe that it’s the right one for both us and our community right now.

We’re working on a better long-term technical solution to these bots, but that will take time to create, test, and verify that it doesn’t cause any problems with federation and how our users use our site, and we’d rather make sure we get it right than have a site that’s broken.

We’re making this change on 28 Aug 2023, and don’t have a specific timeline for how long registrations will require an application, but we will post an update once our new anti-abuse measures are in place and working.

Take care, LW Team

  • @DelvianSeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Good call. Thank you for doing what you need to do to support the site and protect the users as necessary. And as always, the honesty and transparency is appreciated.

  • QuentinCallaghan
    link
    fedilink
    -52 years ago

    IMO registration applications should have been in use right from the start. Less annoyances for admins and moderators.

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I agree it’s annoying and hopefully will one day soon not be necessary, but “degrading” is something I don’t think ever occurred to me. Is there some aspect to having to get manually approved that is degrading that I’m not aware of?

        • @Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I never use services which require an application. First of all, that’s a bad user experience. Second, it’s enough to write some bullshit during job applications.

          • pjhenry1216
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            The application is a question asking if you read the statement (which is the same as the post above).

            The rest of the application is the same application you had to fill out when you created the account even when it was open sign ups. The only real difference is it’s not automatically accepted but manually accepted.

    • @Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I wouldn’t put the manual review of thousands of application into the “less annoyances” box.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    922 years ago

    Whew, I’m glad I got in before this or my fellow homo sapiens might not have noticed I was also a fellow homo sapiens like them and definitely not a robot.

  • The Picard Maneuver
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Is image posting temporarily turned off for lemmy.world users too?

    Since last night, I’ve been unable to post (tested in memes@lemmy.world, memes@lemmy.ml, and lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world). Switched to an alt account on a different instance and had no issue.

    (getting JSON error: unexpected character at line 1 column 1)

    • gk99
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      Considering this is a temporary measure, I imagine not. Lemmy.world has been under constant attacks as the #1 Lemmy instance and it’s not going to stop just because bots can’t get in automatically anymore.

    • @Piers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s a good question. Hopefully the Beehaw admin team will reach out to the Lemmy.World admin team to have a discussion about exactly what the LW admins are trying to achieve and under what conditions they will be ready to reopen submissions. Though even if they do have that conversation there’s no guarantee that that will match up with what the Beehaw admins are looking for in order to refederate. It was made clear from the Beehaw admins at the time though that they didn’t have any issues with LW in general, only that toxic disruptive people were using the open sign-up of LW to create accounts to go cause trouble over at Beehaw (outside of the general LW userbase) and that they hoped to refederate once better tools were in place to address those disruptive users. Could be that lines up pretty well with LW’s goal to wait until they have better tools to address malicious bot accounts before they reopen signups.

  • KrisND
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Sounds like a plan! It’s a 100% beneficial thing, it should clean it up a bit.

  • Ab_intra
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Good. If this is what it takes to overcome the issue then it’s fine. Sucks for the real users but they also have alternatives.

    • NPC
      link
      fedilink
      612 years ago

      I’m so glad I somehow have completely avoided that so far. I’ve heard about, sure but that’s it

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Not long after joining Lemmy, I was on the less fortunate side of things and ran into a troll post. I haven’t seen any of that horrid stuff on Lemmy since then, I assume the admins and mods have been dealing with it first hand… ☹️ hope they are OK, it isn’t good for anyone mentally.

    • @Lakija@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      Are you serious? Holy shit. I haven’t seen any at all. But just the thought that someone is posting it. I hate people sometimes.

    • @Axisential@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      372 years ago

      Oh Christ, really? That’s just sickening. I often sort by new, sounds like I’ve been very lucky to miss it entirely…

  • Machefi
    link
    fedilink
    -92 years ago

    Wasn’t the argument for having open sign-ups that some Lemmy apps redirect straight to Lemmy.world for registration?

    • Antik 👾
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes but when people start creating accounts to post CSAM it doesn’t leave us much choice.

      • Machefi
        link
        fedilink
        -9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Seems like a pretty important detail. Why wasn’t it mentioned it in the post body?

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Because they’re not trying to make a big deal about how easily CSAM spread throughout federated instances making all hosts possibly legally liable. Instances in the US are probably ok, due to various laws like safe harbor for platform providers but with instances all over the world, they all have their own laws to contend with and many never expected this

        • @pexavc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s really not that hard to connect the dots… Unless you’re trying to impose a question for the sake of

          • Machefi
            link
            fedilink
            -132 years ago

            It’s about transparency for me. The admins claim to care about it and users praise them for it, but to me it seems like they’re doing the bare minimum informing us about changes we are about to notice. Reminds me of corporations writing statements trying to sweep things under the carpet. You and I might realise what it’s all about, but many users without the context won’t.

            That’s not what I want Lemmy to be. I want to feel included as a part of the community. I’m doing what I think I can to help it all go in the right direction

            • @pexavc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Understand the issue with transparency. It’s just a very sensitive topic all around. And it sucks it is happening. I am not realizing as well a very important threat that exists in unmoderated federation.

            • Antik 👾
              link
              fedilink
              102 years ago

              Doing “the bare minimum”? We have quite a big team trying to keep the impact for our users to a minimum. We don’t claim to care. We DO care. And we try to be as transparant as possible.

              We monitor the new posts, we react very quickly to reports, we make sure that even with the sign up requirements everyone can still get on board quickly and we are looking for a solution for the csam problem.

              If this is not what you want Lemmy to be, there are plenty of options.

              • Machefi
                link
                fedilink
                -82 years ago

                I’m only talking about transparency here, didn’t mean to undermine other moderation efforts and sorry if I phrased it ambiguously. But regarding informing users, yes, I think Lemmy.world admins do the minimum

  • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Better to semi restrict sign ups so the experience is improved for everyone. When those security issues have been fixed we can open up again. Seems fair