Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

“Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I’m so excited! Let’s celebrate with them!” - nobody

  • @ilega_dh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1901 year ago

    Gather all the worlds subtitles under the guise of being “open” and then bait and switch when you’re the largest subtitles database out there.

    The free API had a limit of 20 subs/day, you’re not going to tell me those server costs were significant.

    • @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Gather all the worlds subtitles under the guise of being “open” and then bait and switch when you’re the largest subtitles database out there.

      MS did something similiar 2007 already.

    • @entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The new API has the exact same free limit. They’re just dropping support for the old API soon and people who want to depend on the old version will need to pay for its continued support because they want to push everyone onto the new site/API

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      And yeah sure, server costs and all. OTOH, subtitle files are tiny, so there’s only so much money you can ask for it realistically.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    Yarr, this be objectionable, but inconsequential.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        In which case the ADA provides extensive coverage that demands reasonable accommodations. Hence why reddit backtracked and allowed a few apps free API access (eg RedReader, which is very clunky but still works).

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Extensive =/= perfect. At least there’s a chance of getting reasonable accommodation. With sex discrimination there’s almost no hope outside of employment.

            Also I’m sure you’re speaking with a dollop of hyberbole and overlooking a bunch of accommodation provided up front.

  • plz1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    Site owner and whomever in marketing wrote that. Pure psychopathy, IMO.

  • @Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Wait… “Ad-Free Subtitles”? I have never even used or heard of this service, but that just feels like an “insult to injury” or “annoy you into paying” abuse? Am I wrong?

    Please tell me that this is not some auto-subtitling service that is going to cause ads to be inserted into the subtitles for other ads or something? Like, how do ads in subtitles even work?

    • @Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      They add one ad at the beginning like “visit example.com” inside the subtitle file

      But luckily there aren’t many companies that want to be associated with piracy* so in most cases it’s blank a generic “advertise here contact mail@example.com

      I remember only a campaign that lasted over a year, a service that promotes legal streaming services, filmamo.it

      * note: why I said “associated with piracy”: those files are going to be used with pirated video files and in most cases are pirated too as they’ve been extracted from a DVD or a streaming service without a license from the copyright holders. Once I saw a guide “how to use external subs with Netflix” for the rare edge cases where the viewer is watching a content via VPN and his sub language is missing, but those are very rare. Not to mention that for MPAA there’s no difference between just torrenting a movie or paying a subscription to Netflix in another country via VPN: for them is all piracy and they want to stop both.

      • @Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Fucking MPAA. Quite possibly the most corrupt pile of dickheads to ever assemble. They blatantly ignored their own raring guidelines for decades until they decided they got tired of being called out on it and changed them to be so vague that they would he allowed to justify any rating, then started accepting “donations” from production companies to get the ratings they wanted.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    What really caught my attention was OpenSubtitles going from a .org to a .com domain.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        Always has been. I’ve no clue why they got hold of an org domain. At first they were more like early years wikipedia. Today most subtitles don’t sink with almost any release and their hashes are inconsistent.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup
    link
    fedilink
    English
    340
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have no skin in this game but I think it sounds like they need to change their name from “open subtitles” to “closed captioning”

    Edit: stupid STT

  • @Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    I had issues in the past with opensubtitles serving malware through fake download buttons on the site.

    You had like 6 different buttons to download with only one legit.

    Sent them an email and they removed them…

    I hardly trust this site and really don’t appreciate they use open in their name and pull up shit like this.

    I wish we had some sort of P2P sub hosting… So we don’t have to deal with sites like opensubtitles.

    • @Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Well, the fake download buttons that give you malware is all part of the experience. This very email continues later with this:

      Unlike non-VIP users, who might face offers, installers, and redirects before accessing subtitles, VIP members have a streamlined and hassle-free download experience.

  • @Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 year ago

    So what pisses me off in these cases is this: they didn’t contribute with the data. They’re a convenient aggregator, I give them that, but the data came from third parties. If you want to start charging for convenient access to the data you should at least make all data before you started charging available in a bulk download for free.

    • @beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They aren’t charging for convenient access to the data though, they are charging for bulk access. The limitations of the new API should not impact people casually pulling in subtitles with VLC when they watch a movie, which is the purpose the API was intended to fulfill.

    • irotsoma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      They’re just doing what discogs did with music. They’ll create contracts with media companies to allow them to claim that all the info in their DB is copyrighted. Eventhough most of it was user created, it is technically mostly copyrighted data. And then they’ll start the legal campaigns to eliminate any competition. They’ll progressively make it more difficult to access and more difficult to update or get things corrected and it will become frustratingly bad but the only game in town.

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Yeah but the basic “give me my subtitles for this specific movie” very likely still works just fine, because… that’s like the whole reason they exist