Edit: ideally wifi cameras that I can solar power.

Looking to replace my Arlo cameras with something self-hostable. Arlo lets you store on a USB stick, but there’s no way to get out from under their cloud, which gets more expensive all the time.

  • @zampson@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not sure about wifi cameras, I have a mix of Trendnet and Hikivision POE, sitting on a Vlan with no internet access. For the software I use Blue Iris. Where I have a need for cameras I have only a Windows server and I have found this software to be the best for me.

  • @infinitevalence@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most cameras are self hosted but they are not marketed to consumers because they require running cables to them either for power and/or data.

    Reolink camera with onvif so support can be connected to Frigate or Shinobi.

    Hikvison and Dahua are common Chinese brands that have lots of options across lots of prices points but are treated as insecure or hostile iot devices required closed networks.

    Costco often has camera and NVR packages that are passable.

    Whenever possible make sure any camera you get is onvif so you can use it with any NVR or software.

    • TheHolm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      HIkvision is great. Good value for money. Just do not use the app to configure them, use web gui. And yes, they need to be isolated from rest of network and the internet ( as pretty much any cameras).

      • @CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Do additional research on the models you’re interested in. Unfortunately they don’t all play nice with 3rd party software but the ones that use open standards are good bang for the buck.

    • @canthidium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can vouch for this. Been using a bunch of Reolink cameras with BI for years. Be careful with Reolink, though. Some cameras work fine and some don’t at all, unless you use some middleman software, which is still hit or miss. Ran into this recently with a camera I got for my garage.

      Edit: The Reolink Lumus line is NOT compatible. They don’t broadcast rtsp.

  • @cosmic_slate@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    One of the easier options is going to be Ubiquiti’s ecosystem. You’ll be tied into it, but the video data is local. You can self-host the Unifi software yourself or grab a Cloud Key G2 Plus, which is a tiny ARM box running Ubiquiti’s software. Then you buy Ubiquiti’s cameras. At least as of a couple years ago, you could not pair this with any standard camera though.

    If you want a fair bit more effort but more flexibility, Zoneminder is an option. Most Amcrest cameras stream a feed over RTSP. You just need to configure Zoneminder to stream the feed.

    • @nottelling@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I already hate Ubiquiti’s Unifi networking that I got myself stuck with. I won’t do any of their other products.

      • @dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Whys that? Stability has improved the last few years, and the value cant be beat with UDM pro and even their lowest cost camera options.

        • @computergeek125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          (if this comment reads like I feel slighted it’s because I do)

          Their networking ecosystem is very focused on a specific class of prosumer and once in it can be very difficult to upgrade out of that bubble to toys that have more growth capacity, from both a tech and learning perspective.

          I have an advanced network with dynamic routing (iBGP and OSPF), as well as several VPN protocols for both site to site and access VPN. I also have redundant layer 3 gateways everywhere in the main site. Ubiquiti has had the tech to make redundant layer 3 for YEARS, but they refuse to and instead stop updating useful product lines that have more features and instead focus on gimmick products that have flashy marketing campaigns. Even on one of their more feature-ful routers (ER-4), I have to use OpenVPN gateway servers because Ubiquiti doesn’t support plugins that I can get on *sense for full mesh VPNs.

          I can really only use them at layer 2 because once I hit my network core I need redundancy protocols at L2 (stacking or vPC/MLAG) to maintain a system that can keep vSAN and Ceph happy.

          I’m really glad I went the *sense route instead of taking a chance on a USG-3 and depending on the custom json file to load OSPF, because that’s a feature they removed from newer gateways iirc.

  • @tvcvt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    If you’re looking for something more or less in the same footprint, I understand those cheap Wyze cameras can be used. There are alternative firmwares available that can be flashed to them to open up the rtsp stream to whatever self-hosted recorder you’d like. Haven’t tried it, but have heard it mentioned on the Self Hosted podcast.

  • @i_am_hungry@meganice.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Frigate is amazing, that’s what I’d recommend. I’m using a 5MP Amcrest camera, works very well. The dev doesn’t recommend Reolink.

    • JustEnoughDucks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Hikvision are also just rebranded amcrest sold cheaper for consumers. You have to isolate them from the internet, but that goes for pretty much every IP camera.

  • @NixDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    This might not be 100% what you’re looking for but I am running Reolink cameras and a Qnap NAS with QVR PRO. The reolink cameras are accessible through IP and some protocol I can’t remember right now. So you might be able to get them to work with your setup

    • @randombullet@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Nah, their software is so infuriating to work with. Even when an SSD it falls to load video clips. Often I have to restart unifi protect on the console or even ssh into it to do and apt update/upgrade to get it working again.

      Self hosted might be a little better, but I’m not holding my breath.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I personally recommend against UniFi for security now. Their software just isn’t great anymore, and you can’t really “selfhost” the protect. You have to have one of their proprietary boxes hosting the protect software. I’m not 100% against that - but I was not aware of that when I bought the first camera and had to buy the box.

      As for the software, it’s honestly just buggy and laggy. I’m in their system now, but if I could do it all again I’d look at others.

      • @nottelling@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m somewhat stuck on Unifi for wifi APs and Routers, because all the other consumer-grade devices can’t handle the number of small IoT devices I’ve got. Netgear and Asus just lose connections with ESP devices and refuse to let them connect after about a dozen. The commercial grade stuff, in addition to being too expensive, is all rack mounted, high power draw and noisy af.

        Aside from the fact that my stuff seems stable on the Ubiquiti hardware, I hate the products. The interface is terrible, Unifi insists on hiding the advanced networking behind a halfass gui, the SSH console lacks half the features of even that terrible gui, and every time i try to create a new routed network, the wifi devices stop connecting.

        • @randombullet@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I use unifi for wifi because honestly I like the dashboard.

          But… for anything layer 3, I’m using MikroTik. It’s extremely powerful without actually running your own router, and many are Poe as well. I’m running a RB5009 which is overkill for me.

          I chose RB5009 because it runs DoH, ZeroTier, sub interfaces, it’s rack mountable, passively cooled, poe capable, and can handle up to 2.5gb symmetrical. I just wish they had 2 x SFPs so I can use a full 10gb WAN

      • @Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You have to have one of their proprietary boxes hosting the protect software

        This was the biggest bummer for me that convinced me not to get into the Unify ecosystem. I already have a robust storage solution at home, I just want to point the cameras to a docker container running on my host with all the storage.

  • @WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What do you mean “self-hosted security camera” exactly? Open source camera? DIY camera?

    Or are you looking for self-hosted NVR software? If so, many people already gave you suggestions. My recommendation - don’t focus on ZoneMinder. It’s ugly software. Instead, use Shinobi for more classic software or Frigate with Google TPU accelerator. Both lightweight enough.

    Myself I have a mix of HikVision and Dahua, recorded/analyzed by Frugate. Everything works like a charm.

    And also, I’ve disabled internet access for all the cameras, so they couldn’t call home. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @nottelling@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I had no real idea how to phrase it, but all these posts have helped. What I was actually focused on when I posted was mainly hardware that can do what the Arlo cameras do:

      • Wifi + battery/solar my house is old and hardwires are a pain in the ass.
      • High def, preferably 4k, but 1080 is ok.
      • Night vision, color or not doesn’t matter
      • Motion-activated, and preferably some way to filter out and not trigger on things like passing traffic cars.
      • As small a form-factor as possible.

      The Reolink hardware mentioned below seems to fit the bill hardware-wise.

      I hadn’t even really considered the software, as I don’t need a lot of features. All I need is to use motion-activated capture to stream to some local storage, and an ability to view a live-stream when I want one. But it looks like there’s a lot of options I need to consider.

      • @WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        For NVR - it looks like you are after Frigate with object detection.

        For cameras - as long as it has RTSP support, then you should be fine. Doesn’t really matter of what kind of brand it is. You can always block internet access for a camera in your router.

      • @ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You’re looking for a self-hosted NVR (Network Video Recorder). The best I’ve found and use in a number of customer’s is Blue Iris, and it’ll work with any ONVIF-enabled cameras, but it costs 100/yr and only runs on a windows machine. I have desperately tried open-source NVRs that will work on Linux but none of them are even in the same universe as Blue Iris for functionality and ease of use.

        Wireless cameras are generally terrible so if you can hardwire them in any way, I would go with that. People have had fairly good luck with Wyse cameras for wireless, I can’t speak to it. See the Selfhosted Podcast for various discussions on cameras to use with NVRs, with a focus on Blue Iris.

        • @WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I have desperately tried open-source NVRs that will work on Linux but none of them are even in the same universe as Blue Iris for functionality and ease of use.

          Have you tried Shinobi? I’ve used it for quite some time until I switched to Frigate. It isn’t broken tho.

          Also, anything special with Blue Iris? Note that it can be ran on Linux because there is Docker image that uses wine.

          • @ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I did have it working under Wine myself, not with docker. The docker image is news to me, I might have to give it a try. What I did notice about running under Wine was that the web interface wouldn’t load the good quality version, just the basic HTML version with the sad camera controls and interface. It worked, but wasn’t great.

            I did try Shinobi, it had a really odd interface. While it worked, I did not find it enjoyable to use and it was pretty rudimentary compared to BI.

  • @Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    AP WiFi Access Point
    IP Internet Protocol
    IoT Internet of Things for device controllers
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    NVR Network Video Recorder (generally for CCTV)
    PoE Power over Ethernet
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
    Unifi Ubiquiti WiFi hardware brand
    VPN Virtual Private Network

    10 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.

    [Thread #289 for this sub, first seen 18th Nov 2023, 23:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

    • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Missed at least two of the more important ones:

      Fewer Letters More Letter
      RTSP Real Time Streaming Protocol
      ONVIF Open Network Video Interface Forum

      Still a pretty cool bit idea though. Keep at it!

  • @fidelacchius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    I have the reolink doorbell which I really like. You can pay for cloud storage, use an SD card or store it on a local server. I believe they also have WiFi Solar cameras for outside as well

  • @S_204@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    Eufy? With the hub it’s all kept local I believe. Even without I think you can get a week with a 128 card.