• Engywook
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Why there is always the guy that tell others what to do? People should use what’s best for them, be it IM apps, browser, OS, whatever.

  • No_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Uninstalled and moved to signal. But no one I know is on signal 🤡

  • @whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 years ago

    Telegram is a suprisingly good app.

    • Open source clients
    • Decent Linux client on the laptop (whatsapp desktop is just terrible)
    • It can be downloaded without Google’s appstore.

    I wish other apps were half as good as Telegram.

      • Virkkunen
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        But isn’t that the whole point of a messaging service? Connect to something else that’s not local and have your messages exchanged?

        • @Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I think smileyhead is alluding to the fact that Telegram servers are not open source, just the clients are.

          • ඞmir
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Why would it matter if the servers are open source? How would you ever verify they are running the exact build they claim they are?

    • Clot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      yeah it is too good for just to be called a messaging app, hope it will be more privacy focused

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It bothers me that the major complaint is not the privacy issues or the people who own it behind the scenes…

        but the technology used to build the desktop application. Electron is just a tool.

      • @totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Hasn’t the founder been a vocal critic of Russia for years, including the Ukraine war? I don’t really see why that would be a concern, especially since Telegram is supposedly owned by a US LLC

        • @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Russia has an army of “vocal critics” who play an important role in the pantomime, you see them on RT regularly. It doesn’t prove anything.

    • @totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      This week, TON Foundation announced that it’s forged a partnership with Tencent Cloud, which has “already successfully supported TON validators and plans to expand its services further to help meet TON’s high compute intensity and network bandwidth needs.” Validators, in web3 lingo, are participants that help authenticate transactions in a blockchain network.

      It looks like the partnership with Tencent only extends to their Web3 blockchain thing, and there doesn’t seem to be any partnership in the main app so it’s not the end of the world - at least, for now.

      Also, what even is this TON blockchain? I never knew Telegram had anything to do with crypto :/

      • @fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Yeah, nah. Anything the CCP can slip it’s slimy festering little dick into, it will.

        There’s no way in hell that Telegram is secure.

        • @totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I guess, but I don’t see how much they can really influence Telegram without any stake in the app itself. They only seem to have a deal for cloud-hosting with the TON Foundation, a non-critical part of the app, and even that appears to be non-exclusive. So if Tencent tries to force a bad decision onto Telegram, what’s stopping them from severing ties and moving everything over to another provider?

          Of course, we don’t know what the situation will be like in the future, but at this present moment, I don’t think Telegram’s security has been breached by this. (Also I think you triple-posted this comment)

  • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    I was under impression that Google Play and Apple App Store don’t allow apps that can do practically everything (super apps). Is it really allowed? If a completely new company submit a chat app that somehow includes taxy hailing, food delivery, nfc/qr wallet and micro-loan features all at once instead of adding those features gradually in future updates, would Apple and Google accept the app?

    • @friendlyhobo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      WeChat and other composite apps are already on the stores, so I don’t see why others also wouldn’t be allowed.

  • @figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Everyone complaining about both telegram and signal here should, idk, just start dead dropping handwritten notes to people inside of dead rats, like the true privacy experts.

    Privacy is important, yes. But if all of my friends use telegram, I’m going to use it too. Not only that, I’m going to be happy about it, because the telegram app is 1000x better than pretty much any other messaging app.

    braces for angry downvotes

      • Clot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        it costs them too much to send code as sms, also some client abuse that in some way, it also may help them to increase the download count of their official app which is not bad imo.