• @araozu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Let’s assume I didn’t know about vaccines and I went to ask for advice to someone. How would I know if what they told me was good advice?

      I would ask myself, are they an authority on the subject? Where do they draw the advice from? Who says they are an authority? What did they have to do to earn that authority? Do other authorities say the same?

      Are mormons authorities on logic? Why trust advice about logic from someone that doesn’t follow logic?

      A liar can say that lying is bad. A killer can say that killing is bad. It just so happens that the advice is good, in spite of who said it.

      • @GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        You ended up agreeing with me in that last sentence.

        Disregarding advice you know is good already because you don’t respect the source is an emotional, not logical, choice.

        • @araozu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Yes, it’s emotional to disregard advice you know is good. However it is a logical reaction to have.

          It is logical for humans not to trust or accept advice from a hypocrite, even if that advice may be good. It’s not about the advice itself, but about who gives it. That was my point.

          Unfortunately humans have emotions, and those emotions factor into our so called “logical decisions”. To ignore our emotions is to pretend we are machines, and machines wouldn’t be in these situations, as a machine wouldn’t give advice it doesn’t follow itself.

          Now, if we were machines, sure, if the advice is good, it’s good, doesn’t matter who gives it.

          Furthermore, if I already know the advice is good, did I receive advice?

          • @GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, OK, sure. Irrationality is logical in that it’s human.

            That’s one great reason to learn self awareness and mindfulness.

  • @recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -111 year ago

    South Park pretty much summed it up. A nonsensical religion is a rational cost for being in a family is nice to each other.

  • Drew
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Actually, mormons think they are very logical. I’ve seen many instances of people talking about how Brandon Sanderson being Mormon is why he’s so thorough at world building.

    • @Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Does he write his world building on golden plates?

      Perhaps he dictates his stories using a seer stone while staring into a hat?

      • @BrandoGil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The flaw of the meme isn’t that it’s picking on religion, the flaw of it is that it assumes illogical views negate logical views. Believing that angels hid golden plates in New England doesn’t negate good looks at a P&L in the same way that a Christian working at NASA that believes a dude rose from the dead doesn’t negate good math to get a satellite into space. In the same way that me being agnostic doesn’t mean I’m always logical and rational in every situation.

        • @Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I argue the opposite and I think the difference is that you believe religious belief can be demarcated in a persons mind where I think it influences all decision making.

          I.e. Does my boss make decisions on P&L because they are good at business or because they prayed on it?

          You and my boss might look at all the same information and arrive at the same conclusion except how can you be sure that the path my boss took reflects your own logic and not prayer?

          If the information about your world passes through a filter to determine if it fits your world view or not it’s possible to serendipitously make the logical decision but it doesn’t mean fundamentally you accept the logic of the situation at hand.

          If your foundational understanding of what constitutes possibility, I.e. that when Jesus died he was transported to north America for 3 days prior to being resurrected I have trouble believing this doesn’t influence your day to day decisions.

  • Walt J. Rimmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Most people don’t actually know what logic is. I would ask him to define logic to see where he’s coming from. Because most people either don’t have a definition or if they do it’s different than the one the person they’re talking to has. But to do that, you’ll also want a definition you could explain to someone else going into asking the question.

      • @Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        The problem is that the joke is old and isn’t interesting. It’s like talking about weather and then claiming you’re Oscar Wilde.


        Person: “Hey, aren’t religious people wacky?”

        *Crickets*

        • @Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          28
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not apathetic about religious people because unfortunately they continue to occupy positions of authority in our society.

          If religious people were actually dismissed in the way you describe I could understand your perspective. They are not mocked liked this though and are very much taken seriously.

          • @Isoprenoid@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -211 year ago

            unfortunately they continue to occupy positions of authority in our society.

            No need to pick on religious people in this case. There are plenty of people with various character flaws in positions of power / authority.

            If religious people were actually dismissed in the way you describe I could understand your perspective. They are not mocked liked this though and are very much taken seriously.

            So you don’t know about:

            • Bill Maher
            • Bill Hicks
            • George Carlin
            • South Park
            • any comedy movie that involves a religious character
            • the Internet
            • Wet Noodle
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              Notably those examples make absolutely no difference on how religious people in authority positions frequently use their religion to guide how they use their authority (which ain’t fucking cool)

            • @OmenAtom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              161 year ago

              Dude was talking about religion in government and your best rebuttal is people make fun of stuff on comedy shows?

                • @OmenAtom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 year ago

                  Please tell me how south park poking fun at you, as they do with everyone, affects your ability to legislate. Last i checked the jokes haven’t stopped anyone from cramming their religion down our throats

          • @Tvkan@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            -121 year ago

            But you’re not talking about that, you’re mocking an individual for being religious.

            • @araozu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              They are not mocking them for being religious. They are mocking their advice about logic, which comes from a religious person.

              Because you know, religion & logic don’t go hand in hand.

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    As someone who has worked with and for Mormons, it’s a special kind of hell. Usually some flavor of narcissist stunted at a middle-school level of inward development.

  • @fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My favorite saying is:

    Not my monkey, not my circus

    Edit: flipped my saying around by accident. I guess I do need more sleep

    • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      No but any religion is similarly “illogical”, Mormons are the same as other Christians with extra “m”

    • @SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      I mean, I can’t think of another sect of christianity that requires special underwear. Outerwear, sure, but underwear? Creepy.

    • @cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      It’s harder to believe because it’s easily disproven. Turns out Joseph’s “translation” of ancient Egyptian wasn’t inspired.

        • @cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Not just as easy. There’s a lot of room for someone to say “this was actually just metaphor” or even “these are just stories to convey values”.

          Take the tower of Babel, for example, we know it never happened. However, a more progressive Christian or Jewish tradition can use the story to talk about how sometimes cultural differences are simply surface level, we are all ultimately the same people. Mormons aren’t so lucky because the book of Mormon was pitched as a literal history and part of the book has literal refugees from the tower of Babel.

          Unlike the Bible, we have the author of the religion who very well documented how literal everything is. We don’t even know who authored nearly any book in the Bible or their motivations.

          I’m not arguing for a god, I’m an atheist exmo. However, there’s a pretty big difference between a bunch of old stories compiled together into a book and a book of fiction that the author went out of his way to claim was “the most correct book ever written”.

  • baltakatei
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    If they had the vocabulary, they probably would say that they live by heavyweight axioms like “Joseph Smith was a prophet of God” and “The Book of Mormon is true”. From my experience, it is possible to exercise logic with flawed axioms so long as you steer clear of a liberal arts education (my mistake, lol).

  • @Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Well, do they believe the crazy bullshit, or are they just an opportunist looking to make connections? Church is lucrative.

    • @Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      How could you be a Mormon if you don’t genuinely believe that Jackson County Missouri is the actual location of the Garden of Eden?

      • @Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The funny thing is, I grew up with a bunch of Mormons for friends and one teacher I know of, and I never found out about most of the stuff they believe until much later. At least they (the ones I grew up with anyway) have the decency to not go around spreading their dogma to non-believers until they’ve already thoroughly roped them into their cult.

  • @Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Boss says “make logical decisions”. Insights like this are why they pay him the big bucks. Not just anybody can come up with such insights. (/s)

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    -51 year ago

    If your boss is a man, it’s easy to explain that logically: possibility for multiple women.