• @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    897 months ago

    The graph goes up for me when I find my comfortable little subset of C++ but goes back down when I encounter other people’s comfortable little subset of C++ or when I find/remember another footgun I didn’t know/forgot about.

    • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      357 months ago

      When I became a team leader at my last job, my first priority was making a list of parts of the language we must never use because of our high reliability requirement.

        • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          277 months ago

          strtok is a worst offender that comes to mind. Global state. Pretty much just waiting to bite you in the ass and it did, multiple times.

          • @mormegil@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Sure, strtok is a terrible misfeature, a relic of ancient times, but it’s plainly the heritage of C, not C++ (just like e.g. strcpy). The C++ problems are things like braced initialization list having different meaning depending on the set of available constructors, or the significantly non-zero cost of various abstractions, caused by strange backward-compatible limitations of the standard/ABI definitions, or the distinctness of vector<bool> etc.

            • @henfredemars@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              47 months ago

              No you are right! Honestly it was several years ago and I struggled to remember exactly what I came up with before I left.

              In our application we for example never use dynamic memory allocation. It has to be done very carefully so we don’t crash. Problem is there’s lots of sneaky ways one can accidentally do it from the standard library.

    • @LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      44
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s one thing that always shocks me. You can have two people writing C++ and have them both not understand what the other is writing. C++ has soo many random and contradictory design patterns, that two people can literally use it as if it were 2 separate languages.

      • @uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        Damm, C23 has a lot of changes. Some of them are really good, some of them I strongly dislike(keyword auto, addition of nullptr).

      • @hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        C is almost the perfect subset for me, but then I miss templates (almost exclusively for defining generic data structures) and automatic cleanup. That’s why I’m so interested in Zig with its comptime and defer features.