• @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    No it’s more than that. When I rip apart s machine I know exactly where to buy each part in it, I usually have the schematic. Any given part breaks and I can fix it

    • @bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Hmmm, I think that depends very much on the license of the schematic then. Can you share the schematic? Is it in editable form? Yes? Then it is open source, if not then it still is not open source. I think there is a lot to argue about in open sourceness of hardware. And I’m not really qualified to make such an argument, but folks at OpenHardware have IMHO a decent opinion on it.

      • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I feel like you just asked me if a chopstick is a fork. My clients ask me for it and I email them the PDF, I ssk other companies sometimes and they email me the PDF. What license is that?

        • @bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          For hardware, there is a difference between knowing the schematics and actually editing the schematics. You can have all the schematics you want, but when you try to modify it to suit your needs you need to either remake the schematic or if the original file is shared, edit that instead. As I said, this is my opinion and the ease of modification is generally also part of open source. For a simple part, yes it is possible to remake it. But a complex assembly requires significant effort. Say a roller needs to be spaced a certain amount. You may want to tweak those distances. Before you manufacture it, you check what parts need to be changed to accommodate for your modification too.