• @Emmie@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Analog clocks are kind of annoying tbh. Sometimes you need that little extra energy you have to spend on wondering whether it is 11:37 or 11:38 already by carefully visually bisecting the circle section between 7 and 8.
    Millimetres of white space keep you wondering about the nature of analogue vs digital, discrete vs continuous and measurement uncertainty while you have better things to do but cannot just give up on OCDing whether it is exactly 11:37:30 already or maybe it is 11:37:35? And boom in these seconds you were wondering it is already pointless because it is the past and now it is time to wonder if it is 11:38:15 or 11:38:30

    Whereas for digital it is just:
    oh it is 11:11 on 11.11.11, how cool, life’s good

    Thus it is my opinion that analogue clocks are virgins whereas digital are chads

    • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      The specific time isn’t as important as how long it is until things are going down. You know the part of the clock the minute hand will be pointing at when it’s time to do shit then you got a handy little progress arc to check in on and instantly know when it’s time to do the things.

        • @el_abuelo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between “most clocks” and “most clocks I’ve seen” - especially if your clock experience is restricted to schools.

          Do you see a lot of schools? Do you know whether the schools you’ve been to all use the same supplier? How broad is your school clock experience? How many clocks do you think you’ve seen, ever?

          Most clocks I’ve seen recently (I can recall exactly 1) have seconds hands. Regardless though I’m not suggesting “most clocks” have seconds hands…I’m just making a quip about how traditional, analogue, clocks have seconds hands to deal with the exact problems noted.

          • @Emmie@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            And yet in schools they don’t have seconds. Never had

            I still have ptsd thanks to that. Can you imagine? No seconds?

            This is pure torture that should be forbidden by Geneva convention. So uncivilised

        • @DNOS@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Yeah we had a problem with the seconds hand in scools, too many students keep starting at them and we all know that if you stare at them time stops …

    • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      143 months ago

      I love having an analog clock. It makes it feel like you have more time compared to a digital clock, making me more relaxed. For example, if the time is 12:34 PM, my subconscious will think, “Ahh, shit, 26 more minutes before 1 PM.” But with an analog clock, I read it as around half an hour before 1 PM. The visual representation also helps, like seeing that there is a distance that the hands need to travel to reach a certain time.

      All in all, I very much prefer having analog clocks vs digital when given the chance.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      I read both kinds of clocks differently and have to sit and process to translate between them. A digital clock I read as “six twenty-five AM.” An analog clock I read as “almost half-past six.” I usually don’t bother reading an analog clock at greater resolutions than a quarter hour.

    • Max Günther
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      13 months ago

      I don’t think this precision is necessary. We have an analog clock in our living room, and I often quickly glance at it to get a feeling for time. I don’t care if it is 11:35 or 11:36, I just think “Oh, it’s half past eleven”. At a train station, when seconds count, analog clocks are a dumb idea. However, then I also have my (digital) watch.