While Ms. Stein condemns both “zombie political parties” as tools of Wall Street and war profiteers, her campaign has focused largely on hammering Ms. Harris, blaming the White House she serves for relentless violence in Gaza and Lebanon.

And Democrats, as never before, are focused on Ms. Stein.

The party has prepared a negative ad blitz for the election’s final weeks, its first-such effort ever directed at a third-party candidate. Fearful that Ms. Stein might divert critical votes in places like Michigan, Democrats are also pressing their case on billboards plastered recently across swing states:

“Jill Stein Helped Trump Once. Don’t Let Her Do It Again.”

She dismisses the “spoiler mythology” that has come to define her mainstream identity, noting — accurately enough — that some of her supporters would never back Ms. Harris anyway.

She says that Democrats would do well to look inward, disputing that she bears any responsibility for Mr. Trump’s fortunes, then or now.

“Those conversations never go anywhere,” Ms. Stein, 74, said in a wide-ranging interview.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    -1128 days ago

    No one is even talking about past collusion accusations. We are talking about right now.

    • @geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      It would be helpful to not leak a ten year old image in a seven year old article if there was evidence. Do present it.

      If Stein was truly colluding with Russia the Democrats would have had a legal foot to bar her from running. And they would not need to make up crazy conspiracy theories which rely on censorship.

      • @Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Español
        627 days ago

        Everyone I don’t like is a Russian asset, the Democrat’s guide to political discussion