This is a genuine question.
I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.
P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.
And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.
I don’t think throwing words like “terrorist” around is at all fair. The guy was responsible for way more death and suffering than any terrorist.
80% of the people here suck hamas & hezbolla dick and think this type of shit is justified.
You’re the only one bringing up hamas and Hezbollah. Seems like you’re a little emotional.
Are you new here? lmao Edit: Maybe a case of tictok attention span.
Nope. Not new. But again, you’re the only one bringing it up anywhere in this post. Trying to force it in where it doesn’t belong. Seems like it’s a you problem.
What. You think the people here who advocate for more murders aren’t the same ones who suck hamas dick in all those anti Israel threads? It’s not “forced in where it doesn’t belong”, it’s literally the same fucking problem.
That’s a big stretch. Your maga auntie is dropping laugh emojis on the united health care post expressing condolences. Seems like you got one thing on your mind. Maybe it’s time to go let the sun shine on your face
Gotta love Redneckistan centric comments thinking everyone is part of their dumbo country. But if you truly believe MAGGATs being sympathetic here, just remember that they just elected someone who’s just like the guy who got murdered, with the help of another such guy controlling the narrative on one of the largest social media sites, with the help of a country that uses botnets to flood the rest of social media to give you this cozy impression of wholesome civil war.
removed by mod
