removed by mod
Generating nonconsensual sexual videos is not something you think, it’s something you do.
Is drawing someone on paper nude okay? What if it’s hyper realistic? What if it’s just a stick figure with giant breasts added? Is using Photoshop to enhance it okay? All of these things are things we do.
It’s much more nuanced than it seems. Where is the societal line of what’s okay and what isn’t?
removed by mod
removed by mod
Remember this thread is about a bot commodifying the production of cumshot videos from any person’s photo. I fail to see any nuance here. There is only one use: generating porn featuring people that don’t want to. Decency rules continues to apply to general use tools as it always did.
I think we can all agree that stick figures with breasts are objectively funny.
removed by mod
Like everyone is familiar with SSC. That’s an ongoing problem and has been since my introduction to BDSM, which was its own personal brand of hell.
removed by mod
removed by mod
removed by mod
deleted by creator
The knowledge is still there, it’s just that the LLM has been instructed not to divulge it, and these instructions are often imperfect and can sometimes be circumvented accidentally or on purpose.
Yeah, given that LLMs are trained from the internet, they all eventually devolve into “Hitler did nothing wrong” memes and/or hardcore racism.
I mean, I assume?
I found the bot promoted in a different Telegram channel dedicated to making and sharing AI-generated nonconsensual pornography which has about 50,000 members.
This isn’t thought policing… First off, these are actions, but second, no one’s policing it.
