An open AI video generation model that was released last month is now being used by thousands of people to generate nonconsensual sexual videos of real people.
  • Pete HahnloserEnglish
    10•8 days ago

    Cancer cured! Climate change solved! Mideast at peace! Finally, we can get to what really matters: AI-generated cumshots.

    • @Alice@beehaw.org
      14•8 days ago

      I mean, I assume?

      I found the bot promoted in a different Telegram channel dedicated to making and sharing AI-generated nonconsensual pornography which has about 50,000 members.

      This isn’t thought policing… First off, these are actions, but second, no one’s policing it.

    • luciole (he/him)
      24•8 days ago

      Generating nonconsensual sexual videos is not something you think, it’s something you do.

      • ScrubblesEnglish
        3•8 days ago

        Is drawing someone on paper nude okay? What if it’s hyper realistic? What if it’s just a stick figure with giant breasts added? Is using Photoshop to enhance it okay? All of these things are things we do.

        It’s much more nuanced than it seems. Where is the societal line of what’s okay and what isn’t?

            • luciole (he/him)
              5•8 days ago

              Remember this thread is about a bot commodifying the production of cumshot videos from any person’s photo. I fail to see any nuance here. There is only one use: generating porn featuring people that don’t want to. Decency rules continues to apply to general use tools as it always did.

            • Pete HahnloserEnglish
              6•8 days ago

              I think we can all agree that stick figures with breasts are objectively funny.

          • Pete HahnloserEnglish
            2•8 days ago

            Like everyone is familiar with SSC. That’s an ongoing problem and has been since my introduction to BDSM, which was its own personal brand of hell.