• @glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    118 days ago

    “They will twist your words. Make them untwistable”

    “Watch your phrasing, Israel and the media will take anything out of context”

    Are you sure you know who Bernie Sanders is

      • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        Really not sure what the point of your ire is here. And you’re kind of coming off like an ass.

        AIPAC and the people they influence are notorious for twisting and misrepresenting rhetoric that’s even slightly critical of the Israeli government. It pays to be extremely deliberate and careful when speaking publicly on those topics. You and I may understand the nuance of Mamdani’s position, but (to be blunt) a lot of more stupid and/or less engaged voters on NYC won’t necessarily have the same reaction. You’ll probably deride me as a “centrist” for saying this, but to ignore the propagandistic influence that AIPAC exerts is essentially an unforced error. So, yes, it is a absolutely good and correct to call out Bibi’s genocidal campaign, but it is a way better idea to do that in a specific, careful, and nuanced fashion, in the interest of minimizing AIPAC’s ability to twist the words into a weapon against him.

          • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            No it doesn’t. It’s an acknowledgement that the Israeli government and zionists in general have a strong tendency to jump on and misrepresent even the most mildly critical statements, and to be careful in that context. Sanders is providing pragmatic, tactical political advice, nothing more. And that’s fine and appropriate. Stop trying to outrage farm against people who actually do support Palestinians and are meaningfully against genocide.

              • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 days ago

                I’m not going to litigate semantics of the English language with you.

                In my estimation, you are reading far more nuance into that statement than is either implied or meant directly. I disagree with your evaluation, and I think you’re just trying to pointlessly stir up trouble where there’s not actually a problem.

                  • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    17 days ago

                    You’re not going to convince me by being pithy and making inaccurate negative insinuations about one of the very few genuinely upstanding politicians that exist in this country.