• @jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -23 days ago

    No, there are sites that oppose me that are perfectly fine because they don’t engage in bullshit.

    National Review is kind of the gold standard when it comes to conservative reporting, I don’t AGREE with them, but they aren’t removable the way the bullshit sites are.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/

    (Bonus - not state owned media either, but I don’t think William F. Buckley Jr. would recognize the current government as either Conservative or Republican, he would be horrified at what’s become of his party.)

    • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 days ago

      he would be horrified at what’s become of his party

      Oh yeah, I’m sure the racist McCarthyist religious extremist would be horrified…

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -23 days ago

        I think it’s less that and more the conservative financial angle. If somebody told him the Republican party would be cheering a plan that adds $3 to $6 trillion in debt, he’d be apoplectic, if he didn’t just outright die on the spot.

        Those kinds of numbers would be just alien to his generation of conservatives.

    • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Lol. The only example of a site you disagree with that you will allow is one that’s just a very slightly different flavor of western chauvinist neo-liberal? Are you fucking serious?

      Like, mate, this is just a straight up admition that you don’t accept anything that seriously opposes you. (And you’ve already admitted that you’ll happily slurp down sources that absolutely do engage in bullshit so long as they agree with you, including National Review.)

      William F. Buckley Jr.

      A right wing lunatic and a literal CIA agent… No wonder you like him and his propaganda outlet.

        • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          Again, I specifically said I don’t agree with them, just that they don’t spout bullshit the way Fox/OANN/etc. do.

          They do though, it’s just bullshit that you’re hypocritical ass finds closer to what you agree with, so you give it a pass.

          You can’t compare National Review to say, I dunno, Alex Jones or some crap. Not even the same UNIVERSE.

          Yeah, you agree with one of them and not the other, which is the only standard you have. Because you a hypocritical toad.

          But you’re blind, “all Western Media is the same”, got it. All Putin aligned media is welcome to feed you their cock all day, every day. Got it. .ml in action again.

          Damn, you’re really just running odwn the list of zionist shitheel stick replies; we’ve go the “you’re blind”, we’ve got the fake quote that I didn’t say, we’ve got the grossly homophobic remark about Putin, we’ve got “but you’re from .ml!”: It’s a Zionist bingo in one line!

            • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Great how if you look at the ban reasons, most of them are clearly salty .world powermods like mass banning me from all of the coms they moderate. I love that there’s a series of literally five bans from the same mod with the same message saying that their users were making so many false reports that it was easier just to ban me than to deal with them. Great instance you’ve got going over there

        • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          “all Western Media is the same”

          No, that’s you talking about any media opposed to the west.